Talk:EduWiki Conference 2013/SWOT analysis: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Continuity: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Continuity==
==Continuity==
In terms of continuity from EduWiki 2012, are we talking about getting attendees and speakers to return or something different? [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
In terms of continuity from EduWiki 2012, are we talking about getting attendees and speakers to return or something different? [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
:Good point!  There are different ways to "measure" this. Returning attendees and/or speakers is one. Simple occurrence is another; i.e. having an ''annual'' conference. Another type of continuity is having some of the same members in the conference organisation team from year to year. Yet another is using similar ways to brand the events each year, other than the obvious WMUK logo; in our case the typeface for the way EduWiki appears in the flyer and the conference programme.  And so on.  So, it's rather open -- but I think all these elements, or varying aspects of them, make for continuity. --[[User:Toni Sant (WMUK)|Toni Sant (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Toni Sant (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:03, 13 November 2013

Continuity

In terms of continuity from EduWiki 2012, are we talking about getting attendees and speakers to return or something different? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Good point! There are different ways to "measure" this. Returning attendees and/or speakers is one. Simple occurrence is another; i.e. having an annual conference. Another type of continuity is having some of the same members in the conference organisation team from year to year. Yet another is using similar ways to brand the events each year, other than the obvious WMUK logo; in our case the typeface for the way EduWiki appears in the flyer and the conference programme. And so on. So, it's rather open -- but I think all these elements, or varying aspects of them, make for continuity. --Toni Sant (WMUK) (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)