Talk:Audit Committee: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Need for audit?: new section)
(→‎Name: re)
Line 2: Line 2:


The name is misleading (as stated). How about "The Internal Audit Committee"? [[User:LoopZilla|Gordo]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 08:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
The name is misleading (as stated). How about "The Internal Audit Committee"? [[User:LoopZilla|Gordo]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 08:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
:That doesn't make any difference. The potentially confusing bit is the audit part, not whether it's internal or external. As a committee, it already indicate that it's internal. [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 08:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


== Need  for audit? ==
== Need  for audit? ==

Revision as of 09:41, 12 November 2012

Name

The name is misleading (as stated). How about "The Internal Audit Committee"? Gordo (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

That doesn't make any difference. The potentially confusing bit is the audit part, not whether it's internal or external. As a committee, it already indicate that it's internal. KTC (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Need for audit?

B3. Should a charity have an internal audit function or audit committee?

Found at http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc8.aspx. The management of risk is an important part of the audit function, both financial and non-financial risk. Gordo (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)