Talk:Submission on Communications Data Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Changes from Jarry1250: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. [[User:Joscelyn|Joscelyn]] ([[User talk:Joscelyn|talk]]) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | *Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. [[User:Joscelyn|Joscelyn]] ([[User talk:Joscelyn|talk]]) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Changes from Jarry1250 == | |||
Since I worry that he's made these suggestions in a rather hidden manner that could easily by overlooked, please see [http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Submission_on_Communications_Data_Bill&diff=27627&oldid=27613]. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 23:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:27, 22 August 2012
Please use this page for comments before 12pm on Thursday 23 August. Thank you. --Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
"Chapter"
I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? Deryck Chan (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. Joscelyn (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Changes from Jarry1250
Since I worry that he's made these suggestions in a rather hidden manner that could easily by overlooked, please see [1]. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)