Talk:Submission on Communications Data Bill: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


:Indented line
*Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. [[User:Joscelyn|Joscelyn]] ([[User talk:Joscelyn|talk]]) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. [[User:Joscelyn|Joscelyn]] ([[User talk:Joscelyn|talk]]) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 21 August 2012

Please use this page for comments before 12pm on Thursday 23 August. Thank you. --Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

"Chapter"

I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? Deryck Chan (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. Joscelyn (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)