Talk:GLAM Outreach Ambassador: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) (→Why: I'm just the messenger...) |
(→Why: c) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::If that has happened, then I'm sorry but it is a mistake as there is no such title agreed with the board. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 02:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ::If that has happened, then I'm sorry but it is a mistake as there is no such title agreed with the board. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 02:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::I would suggest that you take it up with the office directly, then, because about half a dozen volunteers are walking round with, between us, thousands of business cards bearing that title. However, I fail to see the need for the board to micromanage every aspect of the chapter's existence, down to how volunteers (who apparently represent the UK community but not the chapter) present themselves. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''Harry Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 12:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | :::I would suggest that you take it up with the office directly, then, because about half a dozen volunteers are walking round with, between us, thousands of business cards bearing that title. However, I fail to see the need for the board to micromanage every aspect of the chapter's existence, down to how volunteers (who apparently represent the UK community but not the chapter) present themselves. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''Harry Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 12:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::Thanks Harry, already done as you might expect. How the charity is represented is a concern for the trustees, particularly when there may be legal implications. Calling this micromanagement is a bit unfair, particularly when I fought the case pretty hard to ensure that volunteer would get business cards. This was very specifically discussed and agreed some weeks ago, so I have been surprised at why this was apparently changed when the cards were ordered. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 12:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:15, 6 August 2012
Why
What is the point of this page? I know quite a bit about our GLAM programme and we do not have "GLAM Outreach Ambassadors". Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's the title appearing on volunteers' new business cards. I'm assuming it's more of a vanity title intended to impress third parties than a functional one. Harry Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- If that has happened, then I'm sorry but it is a mistake as there is no such title agreed with the board. --Fæ (talk) 02:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you take it up with the office directly, then, because about half a dozen volunteers are walking round with, between us, thousands of business cards bearing that title. However, I fail to see the need for the board to micromanage every aspect of the chapter's existence, down to how volunteers (who apparently represent the UK community but not the chapter) present themselves. Harry Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Harry, already done as you might expect. How the charity is represented is a concern for the trustees, particularly when there may be legal implications. Calling this micromanagement is a bit unfair, particularly when I fought the case pretty hard to ensure that volunteer would get business cards. This was very specifically discussed and agreed some weeks ago, so I have been surprised at why this was apparently changed when the cards were ordered. --Fæ (talk) 12:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would suggest that you take it up with the office directly, then, because about half a dozen volunteers are walking round with, between us, thousands of business cards bearing that title. However, I fail to see the need for the board to micromanage every aspect of the chapter's existence, down to how volunteers (who apparently represent the UK community but not the chapter) present themselves. Harry Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- If that has happened, then I'm sorry but it is a mistake as there is no such title agreed with the board. --Fæ (talk) 02:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)