Talk:2012 Communications Review: Difference between revisions
(→Strategy and Implementation.: new section) |
(→Strategy and Implementation.: reply to Loopzilla) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The starting ideas look to me like a mixture of a strategy and the implementation of that strategy. However, it is a "review" so that is fine and dandy. [[User:LoopZilla|LoopZilla]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 14:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | The starting ideas look to me like a mixture of a strategy and the implementation of that strategy. However, it is a "review" so that is fine and dandy. [[User:LoopZilla|LoopZilla]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 14:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Thank you Loopzilla, I'm glad you said that. There needs to be a review of what's already there and how it's being used in order to strategise effectively - which is the step after the review (in my view, at least). --[[User:Stevie Benton|Stevie Benton]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton|talk]]) 15:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:06, 23 April 2012
This is a place for discussion related to the 2012 Communications Review to take place. Please share anything for suggestion, comment and debate here. The article page has been populated with content as a starting point, please also feel free to make changes / notes there. --Stevie Benton (talk) 13:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Strategy and Implementation.
The starting ideas look to me like a mixture of a strategy and the implementation of that strategy. However, it is a "review" so that is fine and dandy. LoopZilla (talk) 14:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you Loopzilla, I'm glad you said that. There needs to be a review of what's already there and how it's being used in order to strategise effectively - which is the step after the review (in my view, at least). --Stevie Benton (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)