|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Wikiversity==
| |
| Wikiversity has been set up as a sister project to serve as a platform for Open Educational Resources. Many people feel that it is not really meeting its potential. In light of a serious commitment to education probably emerging from the [[Draft 2012 Five Year Plan|WMUK Strategic Plan]], please name at least one element you feel might help take things forward.[[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 15:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Representing Wikimedia UK before public bodies==
| |
| When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds with a public body such as a parliamentary committee or the Charity Commission is it more important that the information given to that body is accurate or that it portrays WMUK in a good light. If the former, then what action should WMUK take if it emerges that information given is inaccurate. If the latter, then how do you reconcile this with WMUK's status as a charity receiving tax concessions and other priveleges from the state?--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 22:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
| |