Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
"Wiki Information Network" appears to have a fair degree of support. Will trade under wikimedia UK.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 01:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | "Wiki Information Network" appears to have a fair degree of support. Will trade under wikimedia UK.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 01:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
===Open Knowledge=== | ===Open Knowledge=== | ||
I suggest something very neutral like ‘Society/Institute for Open Knowledge’, then trade under ‘Wikimedia UK’ with licence from the Wikimedia Foundation. – [[User:Kaihsu|Kaihsu]] 12:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | I suggest something very neutral like ‘Society/Institute for Open Knowledge’, then trade under ‘Wikimedia UK’ with licence from the Wikimedia Foundation. Try [http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/ Companies House’s WebCHeck]. – [[User:Kaihsu|Kaihsu]] 12:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
==milestones== | ==milestones== |
Revision as of 13:12, 29 August 2008
Comments
Excellents job getting this started. This looks like an excellent start and will hopefully involve as many people as possible. I've got some general comments to make with how the chapter should operate, and I'd like to highlight what I perceive as failing from the first attempt.
I firstly get the impression that people wishing to become members were messed around some what. A post from the mailing list shows people had applied for guarantor membership yet heard little from it. For this to be a success, we need the people with board positions to take into consideration the thoughts and suggestions by the volunteers wishing to help. I can't believe that membership requests from some excellent contributors went unanswered. That's not only rude, but it makes people less willing to contribute to the chapter.
In line with this, comments like this from board members should be completely discouraged in any future WMUK. Wacky suggestions of stalking from people that are supposed to be leading the project forward is quite astonishing really. I'd like to see the new board take a more proactive effort at engaging members and associates of the chapter rather than dismissing their qestions as trolling.
We need to make a definite focus. One of the major problems last time round was that the chapter was blinkered in the respect that it put all its energy into getting charity status. Start small, grow big. We should move at the pace that we are working at, not be forced into starting higher on the hierachy with not enough interest to back that up. As we grow in member number, we can then move toward charity status, but we need to get fully organised before attempting anything too big.
Lastly, right from the start we should start looking for places we can promote the WMF. In line with what I said previously, start with small conferences/trade fairs and we can move up from there. We don't need to be getting huge donations from the start, just simply putting our names around.
There are other things I've got to say, but that'll do for now. Ryan Postlethwaite 22:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
message for wikiprojects
Working draft of message for wikiprojects:
As a UK-oriented WikiProject, you might be interested in the formation of a new Wikimedia UK chapter, to replace the now-defunct previous attempt. At this point we are looking for people generally interested, potential members, candidates for the board and people with experence with charities.~~~~ Geni 22:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
election dates
Currently looking at sept 29th with last call for candiates sept 27th.Geni 23:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'd make that end 26th (i.e. Friday) if nothing more than make it a round end of week date. KTC 23:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed Name
"Wiki Information Network" appears to have a fair degree of support. Will trade under wikimedia UK.Geni 01:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Open Knowledge
I suggest something very neutral like ‘Society/Institute for Open Knowledge’, then trade under ‘Wikimedia UK’ with licence from the Wikimedia Foundation. Try Companies House’s WebCHeck. – Kaihsu 12:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
milestones
- Should there not be an early milestone (before draft Memorandum) to define objectives and the public benefit in a way compatible with the Charity Commission rules? (see [1], [2] and [3]) Also there is no milestone to register the company with the Charity Commission ([4] and [5]), but perhaps that is what is meant by Contact HMRC regarding tax-exempt status? It seems to me essential to create the company with memorandum and articles of association that will be accepted by the Charity Commission without modification. Rwendland 10:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
talkpage message
As a UK based editor you might be interested in the formation of a new Wikimedia UK chapter, to replace the now-defunct previous attempt. At this point we are looking for people generally interested, potential members, candidates for the board and people with experence with charities.~~~~
userpage sign
At this point needs to be big bigger than a userbox.Geni 03:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Please help with forming the new Wikimedia UK chapter |
Scope
from IRC:
- England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland (probably)
- Isle of Man, Channel Islands - maybe?
Projects to inform at village pumps and the like
Please strikethough once done
- wikipedia
- en
- simple
Cy- Sco
- Sco (Irish)
- gd (Scottish Gaelic
- gv (manx)
- kw (cornish)
- Wiktionary
- en
- simple
- Cy
- ga
- Commons