Talk:Safe Space Policy: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
privacy
Line 8: Line 8:
:: The follow on will be making up some sort of procedure but should not be too hard. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] 15:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
:: The follow on will be making up some sort of procedure but should not be too hard. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] 15:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
::::Have you read the footnote - do you think that works? [[User:The Land|The Land]] 15:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
::::Have you read the footnote - do you think that works? [[User:The Land|The Land]] 15:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
==Privacy intrusion==
"Persistent intrusion into the privacy of people who choose to participate in Wikimedia UK activities under their Wikimedia username or other pseudonym" - how about the privacy of those who participate under their real-name, or whose username/pseudonym is a convenient derivative thereof? [[Special:Contributions/131.111.234.139|131.111.234.139]] 11:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:13, 19 February 2012

Discrimination at events

There may be situations where there may be positive discrimination at events if places are limited. For example a Women Wikimedians conference or a Silver Surfer event. To say there can be no discrimination may not be strictly possible or desirable. -- 11:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Good point. At the Girl Geek Dinner events which are co-run by WMUK, the attendance policy is set by GGD. In Bristol that means that men can only attend at the invitation of a female member. In Manchester I think the dinners are women-only. We shouldn't have a policy that discourages us from working with these groups. I don't think the policy should include discrimination in terms attendance: discrimination in how people are treated is the core point. This is one reason I prefer "Friendly space policy" over "Participation policy". MartinPoulter 18:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


An 'except where events are arranged for s specific group' amendment should do. Do we have a bridge that Trolls can hide under?
The follow on will be making up some sort of procedure but should not be too hard. Jon Davies WMUK 15:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Have you read the footnote - do you think that works? The Land 15:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Privacy intrusion

"Persistent intrusion into the privacy of people who choose to participate in Wikimedia UK activities under their Wikimedia username or other pseudonym" - how about the privacy of those who participate under their real-name, or whose username/pseudonym is a convenient derivative thereof? 131.111.234.139 11:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)