Microgrants/RMS Titanic research in Northern Ireland: Difference between revisions
(some questions) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<!-- a space for comments and approval --> | <!-- a space for comments and approval --> | ||
Hi Prioryman. Both of your proposals sound great, thanks for posting them. :-) I know that there's other volunteers also interested in the topic of Titanic - are you in touch with them about this, either on- or off-wiki? In particular, it would be great if there was a local in Belfast that could team up with you on this project (those on the [https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaie wikimediaie] mailing list or at [[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland|WikiProject Ireland]] may be able to help here). It would also be good to try to collaborate with the museums - at least seeing whether they would provide free access if they charge for it, but ideally if they could provide access to extra resources that aren't normally available, if they could make archival images that they own the copyright for available on commons under a free license, if they could provide expert peer review for the articles, etc. A phone call might lead towards the first - and a quick in-person chat might help lead towards the latter. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC) | Hi Prioryman. Both of your proposals sound great, thanks for posting them. :-) I know that there's other volunteers also interested in the topic of Titanic - are you in touch with them about this, either on- or off-wiki? In particular, it would be great if there was a local in Belfast that could team up with you on this project (those on the [https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaie wikimediaie] mailing list or at [[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland|WikiProject Ireland]] may be able to help here). It would also be good to try to collaborate with the museums - at least seeing whether they would provide free access if they charge for it, but ideally if they could provide access to extra resources that aren't normally available, if they could make archival images that they own the copyright for available on commons under a free license, if they could provide expert peer review for the articles, etc. A phone call might lead towards the first - and a quick in-person chat might help lead towards the latter. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
These two proposals (and I think they are sufficiently related, being by the same person and for the same purpose, that they should be treated as one proposal) come to £375. The limit for a microgrant is £250, so this would need to be treated a regular grant rather than a microgrant. A grant to support improvements to our content relating to the Titanic in this anniversary year sounds like a great idea to me (so thank you very much for proposing it), but if I were still on the board I would want to see a little more detail (microgrants are supposed to be very easy to apply for and not involve lots of paperwork, but a little more is required for a regular grant). For instance, could you expand your "expected outcomes" section into more detailed and specific "measures of success"? It's important to be able to tell if a grant was successful. I would also want some detail on why WMUK should pay to send you to these various places rather than having a Wikimedian that is already there do it (it may well be that there is no-one there willing and able to do it, but you should try and find someone if you haven't already). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 23:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Please don't remove the lines below! --> | <!-- Please don't remove the lines below! --> | ||
[[Category:Pending microgrants]] | [[Category:Pending microgrants]] |
Revision as of 00:16, 8 February 2012
- Overview
This is the second of two related microgrants I'm requesting (see Microgrants/RMS Titanic research in England for the other).
14/15 April 2012 is the centenary of the Titanic disaster. In advance of that, a number of editors, including myself, are working on articles relating to the ship and the disaster. is currently a Featured Article candidate, with the aim of getting it onto the Main Page on the anniversary day itself.
To support this research, I propose to visit Belfast, Northern Ireland between 12-16 April to carry out the following activities:
- Research at new Titanic Belfast museum (opens 31/03/12)
- Research at Ulster Folk & Transport Museum
- Research at Linen Hall Library and Belfast Central Libary (Titanic book collections & exhibitions)
- Attend & photograph Centenary Commemoration (14-15/04/12)
- Attend SS Nomadic tour (date tbd, hopefully between 12-16 April)
- Budget
- Air fare to Belfast (return) — £60.00
- Accommodation - B&B, £35/night x 3 nights — £105.00
- Rail/bus travel — £32.20
- Subsistence — £20/day x 3 — £60.00
- Museum admissions — £20
- Copy expenses — £22.80
- Total — £300
- Timeframe
This will require three full days. I plan to stay a fourth day at my own expense. The dates are crucial as the key event is the anniversary itself, so this is really a one-time-only opportunity.
- Expected outcomes
- Improved coverage of the RMS Titanic and related articles in time for the 100th anniversary on 14/15 April 2012, particularly to support Sinking of the RMS Titanic becoming a Featured Article on the Main Page on the anniversary day itself
- Improved articles on museums that will be visited
- Expansion of image resources on Commons related to the Titanic and Belfast, as well as the museums and archives to be visited
- (Possibly) Improved relationship between Wikimedia and the museums involved?
- Who I am
Some of you know me already. I've been a contributor to the GLAM project for some time and I have a solid track record of writing featured articles and DYKs, some of which I've been able to illustrate with my own photography (e.g. Inner German border, Battle of Vukovar, Murder of Julia Martha Thomas (which is likely to be on the Main Page next month)). I'm a frequent contributor to the Commons as well (see uploads) and regularly go on museum visits to document particular topics or artifacts (see Hallaton Helmet for a recent example). Prioryman 22:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Discussion
Hi Prioryman. Both of your proposals sound great, thanks for posting them. :-) I know that there's other volunteers also interested in the topic of Titanic - are you in touch with them about this, either on- or off-wiki? In particular, it would be great if there was a local in Belfast that could team up with you on this project (those on the wikimediaie mailing list or at WikiProject Ireland may be able to help here). It would also be good to try to collaborate with the museums - at least seeing whether they would provide free access if they charge for it, but ideally if they could provide access to extra resources that aren't normally available, if they could make archival images that they own the copyright for available on commons under a free license, if they could provide expert peer review for the articles, etc. A phone call might lead towards the first - and a quick in-person chat might help lead towards the latter. Mike Peel 22:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
These two proposals (and I think they are sufficiently related, being by the same person and for the same purpose, that they should be treated as one proposal) come to £375. The limit for a microgrant is £250, so this would need to be treated a regular grant rather than a microgrant. A grant to support improvements to our content relating to the Titanic in this anniversary year sounds like a great idea to me (so thank you very much for proposing it), but if I were still on the board I would want to see a little more detail (microgrants are supposed to be very easy to apply for and not involve lots of paperwork, but a little more is required for a regular grant). For instance, could you expand your "expected outcomes" section into more detailed and specific "measures of success"? It's important to be able to tell if a grant was successful. I would also want some detail on why WMUK should pay to send you to these various places rather than having a Wikimedian that is already there do it (it may well be that there is no-one there willing and able to do it, but you should try and find someone if you haven't already). --Tango 23:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)