Talk:Communications Organiser Job: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Job title: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:


Speaking as someone who is familiar with the UK comms industry, I think you might consider altering "Organiser" to another word. It'll puzzle the eventual jobholder's peers - and future employers. If you're worried about calling them a "Manager", "Coordinator" is one of the more usual terms used. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 17:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who is familiar with the UK comms industry, I think you might consider altering "Organiser" to another word. It'll puzzle the eventual jobholder's peers - and future employers. If you're worried about calling them a "Manager", "Coordinator" is one of the more usual terms used. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 17:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
:I wanted to call the post Director of Communications (a title that tends to impress outsiders) but the board thought that would be confused with their roles as 'directors'.  Yes this is something to consider.  First step find someone good!
. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] 13:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:14, 27 January 2012

Thanks Mike and Rock Drum for working on the page - makes me feel loved!

Jon Davies WMUK 16:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Job title

Speaking as someone who is familiar with the UK comms industry, I think you might consider altering "Organiser" to another word. It'll puzzle the eventual jobholder's peers - and future employers. If you're worried about calling them a "Manager", "Coordinator" is one of the more usual terms used. --Dweller 17:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I wanted to call the post Director of Communications (a title that tends to impress outsiders) but the board thought that would be confused with their roles as 'directors'. Yes this is something to consider. First step find someone good!

. Jon Davies WMUK 13:14, 27 January 2012 (UTC)