Talk:2012 Activity Plan: Difference between revisions
Victuallers (talk | contribs) (→Fundraising: right) |
Victuallers (talk | contribs) (→Looks good to me: cmt) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Good Luck--[[User:Filceolaire|Filceolaire]] 21:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | Good Luck--[[User:Filceolaire|Filceolaire]] 21:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks Filceolaire. Oral citations is an interesting area as some of the Global South regard oral citation as a reliable source. The money reserved for this project should be able to include work of this type if we can integrate it into our/the projects. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] 00:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:30, 1 October 2011
Fundraising
The plan currently shows direct debits being a very small portion of fundraising revenue. I would advise trying to make it a very large portion. It should be the default option when people click "donate" (I would suggest radio buttons for monthly, quarterly, annually and one-off, with monthly being the default). Not everyone will want to set up a direct debit, but you should try your best to get them to. Having a large amount coming in each month from direct debits will give the chapter a lot more stability and security. It will also be less dependant on future fundraisers, making it more independent of the WMF. --Tango 14:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input as always. Chris is a professional charity fundraiser and is very much on top of this. I trust his estimates, and would rather the error be on the side of underestimating, rather than have "a very large portion" of our income not materialise. MartinPoulter 23:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Although you are right to think that DD is an advantage Victuallers 00:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Events
You currently have money allocated to events under the event manager and to GLAM, which I understand is mostly going to be events. You either need to divide the budget by type of activity (events, partnerships, technology, etc.) or by what it's trying to achieve (education, GLAM, etc.). At the moment, you have a bit of both, which causes double counting. I would suggest dividing things by what it achieves, although that does mean that salaries get split between different budgets if someone works on different things (you could try having an "events" budget a "GLAM" budget and then have intra-company transfers from one to the other, but that's probably best kept to the formal accounts rather than the fundraising literature). --Tango 14:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Looks good to me
This looks good to me.
I would like to see a pilot Oral Citations project as part of the World War project - offering some money to other projects which record reminiscences if they let us put the recordings on Commons. That doesn't need a separate heading - there are a number of heading here you could make payments under.
Good Luck--Filceolaire 21:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Filceolaire. Oral citations is an interesting area as some of the Global South regard oral citation as a reliable source. The money reserved for this project should be able to include work of this type if we can integrate it into our/the projects. Victuallers 00:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)