Talk:Wikimedian in Residence 2014 review: Difference between revisions
(History) |
(→Small correction: p.s.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
''As a chapter then we have run the Wikimedian in Residence programme since May 2012, when Andrew Gray started his residency at the British Library.'' As pointed out previously, this was not the first residency run by the chapter. The first was at ARKive, in 2011. [[Special:Contributions/ | ''As a chapter then we have run the Wikimedian in Residence programme since May 2012, when Andrew Gray started his residency at the British Library.'' As pointed out previously, this was not the first residency run by the chapter. The first was at ARKive, in 2011. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (User:<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Andy's talk]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 18:03, 1 July 2014 (BST) | ||
: Also, "Wikimedian in Residence projects in the UK have been run ... since creation of the chapter." isn't accurate. They've run since the creation of Wikimedians in Residence, which was 2010, but the chapter was already a year or so old by then. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:21, 1 July 2014 (BST) | |||
:: Thanks for the clarifying edits on the report. [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|Daria Cybulska (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:14, 2 July 2014 (BST) | |||
== Small correction == | |||
I greatly appreciate the chance to comment on this impressive document, so the fact that an error's gone uncorrected is only my own fault- for which, apologies. My project was tendered and planned on a three-days-per-week basis, so I've corrected it from 0.4FTE to 0.6FTE. I'm not sure what "on a consultancy basis" means in this context. I was paid a salary during the project rather than consultancy fees for the individual activities. [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 21:22, 28 August 2014 (BST) | |||
:I've removed the "consultancy basis" phrase. [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 11:31, 29 August 2014 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:31, 29 August 2014
History
As a chapter then we have run the Wikimedian in Residence programme since May 2012, when Andrew Gray started his residency at the British Library. As pointed out previously, this was not the first residency run by the chapter. The first was at ARKive, in 2011. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:03, 1 July 2014 (BST)
- Also, "Wikimedian in Residence projects in the UK have been run ... since creation of the chapter." isn't accurate. They've run since the creation of Wikimedians in Residence, which was 2010, but the chapter was already a year or so old by then. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:21, 1 July 2014 (BST)
- Thanks for the clarifying edits on the report. Daria Cybulska (WMUK) (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2014 (BST)
Small correction
I greatly appreciate the chance to comment on this impressive document, so the fact that an error's gone uncorrected is only my own fault- for which, apologies. My project was tendered and planned on a three-days-per-week basis, so I've corrected it from 0.4FTE to 0.6FTE. I'm not sure what "on a consultancy basis" means in this context. I was paid a salary during the project rather than consultancy fees for the individual activities. MartinPoulter (talk) 21:22, 28 August 2014 (BST)
- I've removed the "consultancy basis" phrase. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2014 (BST)