2014 Activity Plan/Extending Reach: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Typo)
(report)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


For 2013 programme, please see [[2013 Activity Plan/Extended Reach programme|here]].  
For 2013 programme, please see [[2013 Activity Plan/Extended Reach programme|here]].  
For the report of the Gender Gap project delivered by Roberta Wedge in Q3-4 of 2014, see [[:File:WMUK Gender Gap Report Q3-4 2014 project.pdf|here]].


;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
Line 21: Line 23:




The quantity of Open Content continues to increase :
The quantity of Open Knowledge continues to increase :
*Quantity of content created during events - contributing to global targets of quantity for content (civi)
*Quantity of content created during events - contributing to global targets of quantity for content (civi)


The quality of Open Content continues to improve:
The quality of Open Knowledge continues to improve:
*Quality of content created during events - contributing to global targets of quantity for content (civi)
*Quality of content created during events - contributing to global targets of quantity for content (civi)


Line 30: Line 32:
* Training workshops & editathons for underrepresented groups and themes - leading on the global targets of diversity activity units (civi)
* Training workshops & editathons for underrepresented groups and themes - leading on the global targets of diversity activity units (civi)


We are perceived as the go-to organisation by UK GLAM, educational, and other organisations who need support or advice for the release of Open Content:
We are perceived as the go-to organisation by UK GLAM, educational, and other organisations who need support or advice for the development of Open Knowledge:
* Projects with partners - Contributing to the total reputational score (This area can relate to projects run with Diversity organisations, but also Expert Outreach organisations) (civi)
* Projects with partners - Contributing to the total reputational score (This area can relate to projects run with Diversity organisations, but also Expert Outreach organisations) (civi)



Latest revision as of 14:11, 2 March 2015

Lead member of staff

Daria Cybulska

Indicative budget amount

£10,000

Description and overall rationale

We seek to target groups and individuals normally under-represented in our community, by supporting outreach projects aimed at increasing participation in the Wikimedia movement (especially amongst women, or involving any minority ethnic, LGBT, linguistic or other community in the UK). We are working with our community to find opportunities to increase participation from the relevant groups, and improve the content in the under-represented areas on Wikimedia projects. This is done through outreach activities, partnerships with particular outreach institutions, on-wiki initiatives (such as Wiki Loves Monuments). These activities have parallel aims of improving content and attracting more participation from the target groups.

Additionally, we are working with scientists, scholars, learned societies and funders to help experts improve targeted content areas of Wikipedia and its sister projects, bringing that expertise to the widest possible public, in the stream of work called Expert Outreach. Many scholarly societies are, like Wikimedia UK, registered charities whose mission includes informing and educating the general public. These common goals are advanced with internal training events, publications and public events. This work complements WMUK's partnerships with GLAMs and Education sector.

For 2013 programme, please see here.

For the report of the Gender Gap project delivered by Roberta Wedge in Q3-4 of 2014, see here.

Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter

Throughout year, with the focus on particular events in the calendar - e.g. Women's History Month (Q1), Black History Month (Q3).

Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant
Risks
  • There continues to be insufficient take-up.
  • We fail to reach the identified groups.
  • Our capacity is too limited to deliver the projects needed.