Water cooler: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Revert to revision 82259 dated 2020-09-22 02:51:05 by 86.21.206.209 using popups)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
{|style="float:right;border:solid silver 1px;margin-left:8px;margin-bottom:4px;"
{{divbox|blue|Welcome to the water cooler| This is a place to find out what is happening and to discuss our external projects and activities.  Feel free to suggest ideas that could help our charitable mission or ask questions about how you can help.  To discuss the inner workings of the charity, head over to the [[engine room]].}}
{{divbox|green|WMUK Grants programme - a piece of cake?[[file:Tile wmuk.jpeg|75px|left]]|<center>Applying for a grant is easy.<p>If Wikimedia UK can help you improve Wikimedia projects, check out our [[grants|grants page]].</center>}}
{| style="float:right;border:solid silver 1px;margin-left:8px;margin-bottom:4px;"
|-
|-
|[[File:Archives.png|x100px]]
|[[File:Archives.png|x100px]]
|-
|-
|align=center|{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2009|[[/2009|2009]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2010|<br>[[/2010|2010]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2011|<br>[[/2011|2011]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2012|<br>[[/2012|2012]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2013|<br>[[/2013|2013]]}}
| align="center" |{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2009|[[/2009|2009]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2010|<br>[[/2010|2010]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2011|<br>[[/2011|2011]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2012|<br>[[/2012|2012]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2013|<br>[[/2013|2013]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2014|<br>[[/2014|2014]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2015|<br>[[/2015|2015]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2016|<br>[[/2016|2016]]}}{{#ifexist:Water_cooler/2017|<br>[[/2017|2017]]}}
|}
|}
__TOC__
__TOC__


== Kanban for editathons ==


[[File:WCCWiki4.jpg|thumb|A {{wp|kanban board}} at the Women in Classical Studies editathon at Senate House, London]]
I just saw the newsletter with a picture of the {{wp|kanban board}} used at the Women in Classical Studies editathon.  What a great idea!  It helps people share what they are working on.  Helps to avoid edit conflicts.  Enables organisers to list all the articles that have been improved.  It could possibly work well for a recap session at the end too, where people talk about the changes they made.


== Working with non-English language Wikipedias / language policy ==
Who was involved with that editathon?  Who has used it elsewhere?  I would love to hear how it has been used in practice.


Hello everyone. During a recent discussion about the [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/04/1533/ Wikimedian in Residence role at the National Library of Scotland] a valid point was raised about notifying Wikipedians who spoke Gaelic to the role. I think everyone is aware that there are opportunities for Wikimedia UK to do some excellent outreach work to speakers of non-English languages and Wikipedians who work on non-English language projects. These are not limited to what might be called indigenous UK languages such as Kernowac or Gaelic, but could also include languages that are pretty widely spoken such as Bengali, Polish and Hindi. If anyone has any suggestions on how we might successfully do this please do share them here. It was also noted that we may have a need for a language policy, particularly to cover any Wikimedian in Residence roles (and, potentially any eventual Wikimedia UK recruitment) in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Again, comments and suggestions are very welcome. Thanks in advance for any input on this important topic! [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 23:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 15:09, 3 February 2017 (GMT)


:The inspiration for such a Policy came from a discussion on Scotland, and therefore this thread should really only involve the WMUK's involvement in Scotland rather than an overarching linguistic policy on the situation of minority languages (such as Bengali) in England. Our Policy on Scotland must begin with the [[:w:en:Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005|Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005]] and [[:w:en:Bòrd na Gàidhlig|Bòrd na Gàidhlig]] who are responsible for Gaelic on behalf of the Scottish Government. Wales has similar, yet stronger, legislation (including the [[:w:en:Welsh Language Act 1993|Welsh Language Act 1993]] and the [[:w:en:National Assembly for Wales (Official Languages) Act 2012|National Assembly for Wales (Official Languages) Act 2012]]) which gave the Welsh language official status in Wales - and I suggest that we also include Wales in our Policy, under a separate heading. The [[:w:en:Welsh Language Commissioner|Welsh Language Commissioner]] ensures that ''"In Wales, the Welsh language should be treated no less favourably than the English language"'' and ''"Persons in Wales should be able to live their lives through the medium of the Welsh language if they choose to do so."'' There are common elements to both countries, which should be acknowledged as should over-riding international law, including [[:w:en:European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages|European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages]], the [[:w:en:Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights|Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights]] (1996) and to some extent the [[:w:en:International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights|International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]. -- [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 01:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
: Hi [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]], I was the lead trainer at the [[ wikipedia:Meetups/UK/Institute_of_Classical_Studies_Jan_2017 |Women in Classical Studies editathon]]. I saw the kanban in an [https://www.instagram.com/p/BClfaSjhVdG/ Instagram post] for an [[wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism|Art+Feminism]] editathon. It worked much better than expected - a fantastic indicator of the [https://youtu.be/bAWxTPZZNrg?t=2m27s achievements of the day].[[User:Eartha78|Eartha78]] ([[User talk:Eartha78|talk]]) 19:02, 3 February 2017 (GMT)


:: I would strongly counsel against taking a leaf from the UK's public sector rules on this; they are overly-heavyweight and proscriptive, and don't actually apply to Wikimedia or WMUK. Instead, the focus should be on engagement with and support for non-English language groups (be that Welsh/Gaelic/BSL/Polish/Bengali/Arabic/''etc.'') - the question really is "are there people with such interests in our communities?" - if yes, where are they and what do they want?; if no, are there things we're doing wrongly that we could correct, and/or are there appropriate groups with whom we can reach out to encourage such participation. [[User:Jdforrester|Jdforrester]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester|talk]]) 05:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
::Cool. So how did you use it?  Did you get people to brainstorm a load of post-its of articles to look at, at the beginning of the day?  Did you just say 'if you have an idea, stick it on the board'?  Did you come with the post-its filled out already? [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 10:25, 11 February 2017 (GMT)
::: Jdforrester - the employer here is The National Library, not WMUK, they are not only in the public sector but are bound by the laws (not "rules") of Scotland, and their own in-house language Policy. No, they don't apply to Wikimeda UK, but they certainly do to the employer. I've outlined my reasons above why the Policy should mention specifically the different countries (Scotland and Wales) and imho the title should reflect this; I suggest "WMUK's Language Policy for Wales and Scotland". A separate document could be written for other languages which have lesser legal status. In answer to the second half of you comment may I refer you to the Gaelic speaking community [http://gd.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%AComh-Dhuilleag here] where we have a very live Gaelic speaking wiki. Your most important comment ''are there things we're doing wrongly that we could correct'' is very honest and needs addressing. If we have ignored wiki-gd thus far, we need to embrace that community, support and encourage them to be part of our dream; more importantly: can we be part of their dream, their vision? A Language Policy to guide us would be a good start. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 08:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


: The most obvious thing is to ask the National Library of Scotland, as they deal with outreach to non-English minorities all the time for recruitment and the WIR is going to be their employee. It may be time for WMUK to run an open discussion about how best to engage with minority groups, this is more likely to reach meaningful conclusions if supported with advice from minority group organizations and using channels and forums where their members hangout. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 06:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
::: The group were quite well prepared prior to the editathon. They had identified a number of articles to create - some had already done the research and started to writing in their sandbox. When we began the second part of the editathon they each committed to an article, wrote it on a sticky note and stuck it to the wall!  Moving the notes from left to right was surprisingly motivating and a good excuse to stretch ones legs. Also used the sticky notes for an evaluation exercise at the end of the session. [[User:Eartha78|Eartha78]] ([[User talk:Eartha78|talk]]) 18:27, 16 February 2017 (GMT)


::Exactly! [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 08:59, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
::::Thank you Eartha78. That is really interesting. I will use this next time I do an editathon.  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 09:39, 19 February 2017 (GMT)


:Also as regards Irish, see [[W:en:Coláiste Feirste|Coláiste Feirste]], a secondary Irish Medium School in Belfast.[[Special:Contributions/86.157.228.106|86.157.228.106]] 09:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
== Wikimedia UK's plans for 2018 - community consultation ==
[[File:Programmes Consultation Video - Wikimedia UK.webm|centre|thumb|800x800px|Watch our video about our plans for 2018]]  


::Yes indeed! Is there legislation for the Irish language in Northern Ireland? Do you have any other links, relevant to writing a language Policy? [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 10:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia UK is in the process of writing our proposal to the Wikimedia Foundation for funding during 2018/19. The deadline for the bid is 1st October after which it is assessed by staff at the Foundation, there is an opportunity for community feedback and questions, and the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meet to consider proposals and make recommendations about grants.  
*Of course there are laws that we and our partners and potential partners need to follow, but we also need to remember that we are part of a global movement with a global mission. We have a huge amount of the world's heritage in the possession of UK GLAMs, and in many cases as with [[:en:Tipu%27s_Tiger|Tipu's Tiger]] and [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/02/the-british-library-picturing-canada-and-photos-of-cats/ the British library's Canada collection] we can be the facilitator to get global access to cultural information that is in the UK. Helping UK institutions reach out to non-English speakers here, as tourists or on the web could be at the heart of what the Wikimedia movement associates Wikimedia UK with. [[User:Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)|Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
::I agree it would be great for WMUK to be known for the internationalism of our work with cultural heritage; and as you highlight we already are. Over the weekend we met with WMIN representatives to take this particular relationship forward due to obvious shared heritage with key assets in the British Library and other institutions that are of immense value for Indian culture and history. Similarly the initiatives you mention that I took part in sponsoring are great examples of simple international partnerships working within our movement.
::We are a highly successful global movement, however we do not lead the field with expertise in multi-lingual outreach or accessibility, in fact, at times we are naff at it compared to other global organizations of volunteers. We had a successful global conference in Milan, however the conference materials and presentations were almost entirely in English and the conference venue and social venues failed to assure wheelchair access, even though we knew that one participant was restricted to a wheelchair (I'm aware of the issues that came up as I took some time out for a quiet and interesting chat about access with the person affected). As an example of our maturity along these lines, I think this is fairly normal for us, and even though we can probably think of counter-examples where it has worked much better, this has not yet transferred into policy and standard practice. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 11:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
:::From my experience of Wikipedia I thought that creating policies was something that comes naturally! But seriously though, I’d suggest that WMUK has some sort of guide at the very least if not a policy. Formally informing the Gaelic and Scots wikis of this post at the same time as the English one would have just been common courtesy.  I don’t for one minute think there was an intention to insult, but its little oversights like this that tends go get people's back up and rightly or wrongly add to the perception that WMUK is more focussed on one langue wiki over others. '''IF''' it is agreed that a language/languages guide or policy is a good idea, then the [http://www.estynllaw.org/index.php Estyn Llaw] project in Wales has a wealth of [http://www.estynllaw.org/en/cyngor.php advice and guidance], '''some''' of which can be taken on board and adapted. Here are some suggestions (of mine) on how to draw up a guide:


{| class="wikitable"
As 2018/19 is the final year of our 2016 - 2019 strategy, our programme for next year is in many ways a continuation of our activities in 2017 and falls under three key strands:
|-
! Theme !! Level<br> (easy, tricky, wishful thinking!) !! Example !! Advantage !! Risks !! Obstacles !! Solutions
|-
|Attracting staff with bilingual skills || tricky || Attracting Gaelic speakers to apply for WIR post || *Make good use of Gaelic material at NSL<br> *Increase content on Gaelic wiki || || ||
*Post notice on Gaelic wiki (!)
|-
|Organising events || easy || If arranging a series of events in Wales, arrange a proportion of them through the medium of Welsh || *Attract new editors in that language *Increase content on Welsh wiki || ||WMUK staff does not speak the language || *Ask local volunteers to help <br>*If a GLAM type event, ask if partner organisation has Welsh speaking staff
|-
|Organising events || easy || If one event in Wales, make Welsh visable, e.g. have publicity/posters/webpage bilingually, greet guests in both languages|| *Attract new editors in that language<br> *Increase content on Welsh wiki || ||WMUK staff do not speak the language ||
*Ask local volunteers to help <br> *If a GLAM type event, ask if partner organisation has Welsh speaking staff
|-
|Publicity || easy (ish) || If promoting event/story related to Wales , send out press release in English and Welsh ||  Increase likelihood of story in Welsh language media || *Translation could mean delay<br> *Translation could mean cost ||WMUK staff do not speak the language ||
*(cost) Ask local volunteers to help
*(time) Give volunteers plenty of notice
|}
:::Anyway, just some thoughts/ ideas I wanted to share!--[[User:Rhyswynne|Rhyswynne]] ([[User talk:Rhyswynne|talk]]) 13:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
*As a general rule I think we should work starting with existing Wikipedian communities, rather than trying to build from scratch.  This is what we have successfully done in Wales, & pretty much failed to do with the "non-native" language communities in the UK. As far as I can see the level of activity on the Gaelic WP is really very low, & most editors are probably based in the relatively Gaelic-speaking areas. We don't AFAIK have an inside contact, equivalent to Robin, which is an essential first step; then we'd be able to announce things to the Gaelic WP in Gaelic, which of course we should do with things like this. By all means add it as a desirable thing for the Edinburgh post, but I don't see we need a policy. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 16:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
**Of course, it depends what we mean by policy.  We don't want to break anybody's balls over this and we don't want a load of legalistic verbiage.  But some kind of direction would be useful.  I think Rhyswynne's table is an excellent start for that and I also agree with Johnbod that working with existing Wikimedian communities will help in a lot of respects.  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 17:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
* FYI elsewhere in Wikimedia, these languages don't even have dedicated Wikisources yet.  I mention this as the original conversation brought up "Gaelic manuscripts and books" and "Scots classics" at the National Library of Scotland.  Multilingual Wikisource covers them, however.  [[oldwikisource:Category:Gàidhlig|Gàidhlig]] currently has a glorious one text (and, even then, has no source for it), while [[oldwikisource:Category:Kernewek|Kernewek]] has twenty texts and [[oldwikisource:Category:Gaeilge|Gaeilge]] has many.  [[wikisource:Category:Text in Scots|Scots]] is actually part of English Wikisource, with 22 texts.  This doesn't even need material from NLS to rectify, the Internet Archive has at least a few works available ([http://archive.org/details/seanchaidhnatrag00macc Example]). It just needs people.  (NB: All appear to have Wiktionaries but [[wiktionary:gd:|Gàidhlig Wiktionary]] looks to be in bad shape.) - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 17:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
*:Further to this: NLS have [http://archive.org/details/nationallibraryofscotland a section] on the Internet Archive but all their texts appear it have CC-BY-NC licences (even the clearly PD-old Victorian works).  The copyfraud is easily ignorable but it would help if they didn't do that. - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 17:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 
I've created a [[User:Llywelyn2000/Welsh Language Policy|DRAFT Welsh Language Policy here]] based on the [http://www.comisiynyddygymraeg.org/English/Law/welshlanguageact1993/Pages/thirdsector.aspx Language Commisioner's] recommended template: Help Llaw. To keep everything together I suggest that any comments be kept here at the Water Cooler! I also suggest a new second policy to follow, should we agree on this one, based of the Scottish Gaelic. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 12:37, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
:Apart from any specific issues that I may have with your draft, I would say that this is not the sort of policy we want.  It is a statement of something that looks like a good idea, rather than an analysis of problems, opportunities or options.  I much prefer Rhyswynne's table because it is a good start at an analysis of what our options are.  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 13:36, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
::WMUK should have both.  Strategic policy and an operational action plan are different things; albeit things that should work together.  The draft has a lot that Rhyswynne's table misses (and probably couldn't include) such as communication in Welsh.  That does, however, bring up a potential problem: WMUK is not a large organisation and does not, to my knowledge, currently employ anyone fluent in Welsh, Scots Gaelic, Cornish etc.  A commitment to answering communications in Welsh ''and'' without a delay is probably a bit too much (even with Google Translate available), especially if extended to the other native languages of the UK.  Defining it as an aspiration but acknowledging the potential for a delay might be more realistic. - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 16:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
:::Another thought: Putting something on the [[Main Page]] about language coverage would be useful.  Just a footer box, along the line of the sister links on most wiki projects, would be enough.  It would be a natural assumption to read WMUK as WMEngland; something pointing out the wider remit could offset that.  When/if other-language pages are made for this wiki (eg. [[Main Page/cy]]) they could be linked from here.  In the meantime it could just be a simple selection of relevant languages (or possibly links to the the assorted projects within those langagues, as long as no suggestion of possession or authority is made). - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 17:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
::::I agree that putting something on the main page about language would be useful.
::::A commitment to answering communications in Welsh ''and'' without a delay is clearly impractical at the moment... but maybe it would be a good target to aim for... or maybe we should spend our energies on something else.  It's difficult to know when no analysis is included.  If we did make it a target then knowing ''why'' it was a target would probably be a lot more useful than knowing ''that'' it was a target.  And, of course, setting out some actions to meet the target is also essential, 1. so it isn't just wishful thinking and 2. so we can look at those actions to assess how much effort it will take.  Maybe we want to commit to it if it is straight forward but not if it is really complicated.  And that is just that bit of the policy.  Maybe other bits of it are equally open to question... but it's difficult to know because we don't know why they are in there.  Do you see my point?  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 21:28, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
:::::My table was only just a sample of what could be included. The draft contains parts that could be implemented right away (e.g. the 'Planning' bit) while some parts may never be adopted. I'm not sur ehow WMUK goes about drawung up policies/guidleines, but how about breaking the draft down to a similar table with a column for people to accept/oppose each 'theme' and cite reasons. <small>--This comment was added by [[User:Rhyswynne|Rhyswynne]] at 08:40, 25 April 2013‎</small>
::::::Syniad da Rhys. Dw i'n awgrymu fod hynny'n digwydd rwan, efallai ar dudalen ar wahan i hwn fel bod pawb yn medru ei ddeall. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 12:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::This table is a great start. I suggest that Rhys uploads it onto his namespace so that we can all amend and discuss it there. I also like the suggestion that we replicate and translate WMUK's home page into Welsh asap, with a link to two or three fluent Welsh speakers who could discuss with members, potential members and users in Welsh, if that is their preferred language. In fact a number of WMUK's staff and Board members have suggested this over the last year. A [[Visit report - National Eisteddfod 8 Aug 2012|bilingual article]] was actually published in our Report Section.
 
::::::The question of why we need to do this (asked by User:Yaris678) can be answered in many ways: Dafydd Iwan's poetry mentions that ''only a fool asks "why is snow white"''? Another answer would be ''because it is there'', but crucially: ''to respect the wishes of members or users who prefer speaking in their own language'' or ''because there is legislation in Wales endorses it, and will in the next couple of years demand it, as they do with the main institutions and local government''. Another reason of course is that WMUK in Wales can seem to be, to many people, a very foreign creature, and that may be the reason why the Scots Gaelic and the Welsh language (apart from a handful of us) do not bother joining let alone participate. But my personal reason '''why''' we need to do this is that we need to reach out with our vision and enthusiasm to people who are much happier speaking Welsh and I we must respect that choice or alienate them. It's part of a worldwide movement which strives for the conservation of the rich diversity of culture on this planet; the opposite is a Big Brother, [[:w:en:George Orwell|totalitarian]], monotone-grey, state.
 
::::::As I mentioned at the beginning of this thread, my suggested action plan involves the only two languages which are [[:w:en:Indigenous language|indigenous]] to the countries of Britain and which are protected by legislation: Scottish (and Irish?) Gaelic and Welsh. Once this is in place we can look at other languages. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 12:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::::You've given some reasons to do a lot more in the area of non-English languages but not necessarily reasons that lead us to what that should be.  I think everyone agrees that we want to improve things in the area of non-English languages.  We are just trying to work out what to do.  Your reference to a totalitarian state is dangerously close to ''{{w|Reductio ad Hitlerum}}''.  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 16:40, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::::Presumably the first and easiest tasks would be to create a few core pages in each language on this wiki.  The main pages are obvious and it will probably help if a few other important pages are done too (perhaps [[Membership]], [[Events]], [[Contact us]] and [[Board]]).  I would signify language with a subpage (eg. [[Main Page/cy]], [[Main Page/sco]], [[Membership/cy]], [[Membership/sco]] etc.) but if anyone has a better idea please say so.  There appear to be enough Welsh speakers here to handle that set.  Perhaps others could be found on the appropriate projects; the Scottish ones could come out of the NLS WIR. - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 18:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::::::Thanks AdamBMorgan, I've now translated around five of these suggested pages, as testspace; please feel free to amend the links etc.
::::::::::AdamBMorgan said: '' A commitment to answering communications in Welsh and without a delay is probably a bit too much (even with Google Translate available)...'' One possible answer to the fact that staff at HQ do not speak fluent Welsh is to pass on any such communication to any one of the 120 fluent Welsh speakers who edit the Wici Cymraeg regulary; I certainly would be willing to answer any phonecalls, emails or other correspondance passed on to me and I know that other would also do this. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 07:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 
===Table of language scope===
{{Projectslang}}
 
Spinning off from my comment above, I've started this table of UK languages and associated wikiprojects: {{tl|Projectslang}}.  This table just lists native languages at the moment, not the significant non-native languages like Polish, Punjabi or Urdu.  It also doesn't list the currently unsupported native languages like Angloromani and Shelta.  Two extinct languages ''are'' included because there are Wikimedia projects in those languages.  The bold names link to potential main pages and there is some minor language switching in the bracketed language names (assuming the subpage name is the language code).  The, currently unlinked, footnotes will need to be lang-switched too (and the method of doing so can stand to be upgraded too).
 
As for why bother with this, this can be placed on an appropriate languages page (or pages, as there really should be one of those for each language) or, if suitably amended, on the main page.  It shows what languages Wikimedia UK could/should support and what projects could be supported as a result.  It also at least acknowledges that these languages and projects exist, compared to the very English-Wikipedia-only appearance of WMUK at the moment (of course, the demographics are likely to always push in that direction).
 
Feel free to amend or ignore as desired. - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 17:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
::I know Isle of Man is not technically in the the UK, but where would [http://gv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ard-ghuillag Manx] fit in?--[[User:Rhyswynne|Rhyswynne]] ([[User talk:Rhyswynne|talk]]) 10:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
:A great spinoff! I'll amend it a little on the Wicipedia Cymraeg; really useful. Thanks. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 07:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:Hi Adam, thanks for putting this together. I would be cautious and spell out that this is not intended to limit Wikimedia UK if this table, or similar, is used in relation to the projects of the charity. The charity's scope is not limited to current or past "native languages" and there may be value in finding figures for all non-English languages in the UK as a basis for judging how much impact new project proposals might have for the beneficiaries of the charity (not restricted to people in the UK). As has been mentioned previously, statistically Polish is one of the highest used languages in the UK today, so encouraging Polish readers and writers to take part in our projects is probably an easy win. I doubt there is any need to make a choice between approaches, as it makes sense for us to aim to be as inclusive and diverse as possible. Cheers --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 08:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
::Fæ, I can appreciate that table might give the impression of limiting the scope of the chapter if it were used in the wrong way.  But so long as we are mindful of that risk it should be manageable.
::I think some of the recent ideas generated by Adam and Llywelyn have been excellent and fit well into WMUK being a volunteer-led organisation.  I really like the idea of mobilising volunteers to represent WMUK in non-English languages.
::Adam, Llywelyn, what do you think of the idea of doing a specific [[Media training for volunteers - background|media training]] session in Wales for Welsh speakers who would like to represent WMUK to Welsh-language Media?  This is just an idea I have now, but if we speak to the right people I think we should be able to persuade them.
::[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 19:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
:::<small>''Interesting suggestion, I'd support that. It would be cool to have snippets of the odd event/workshop in Welsh on video too. :-) --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 19:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)</small>
:::@Yaris678 That's exactly the sort of thing I'd like to see, although at this stage, the number of takers is likely to be low, but I'm sure that there would be demand for a Training-the-Trainers course through the medium of Welsh.--[[User:Rhyswynne|Rhyswynne]] ([[User talk:Rhyswynne|talk]]) 10:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
::::In fact this was discussed in the last meeting of [http://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicipedia:Wici_Cymru/Cofnodion_08_Mawrth Wici Cymru], a society to further the cause of the Wiki family in Wales. Rhys and myself have done some research into who could deliver such training. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 11:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Nice to see this initiative being progressed positively. I left a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Wales&diff=552397168&oldid=552383605 comment about it] at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Wales Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales] but it has largely been superceded by events. Obviously, with 20% of the population of Wales speaking Welsh, the importance of addressing the non-English (official) native languages is a real one for Wales in particular! As for the non-native (but widely spoken) languages such as Bengali and Polish, I would imagine they will be contributing in projects other than Wikimedia UK, if any, in these languages. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 14:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
:I agree that Welsh deserves more attention than some languages since it is the second most widely spoken language in the UK.
:I think that you have got the wrong end of the stick somewhere when you say "As for the non-native (but widely spoken) languages such as Bengali and Polish, I would imagine they will be contributing in projects other than Wikimedia UK".  Wikimedia UK exists to promote free knowledge for all.  It can do this in a number of ways, but one of the biggest things it does is encourage people to work on projects run by the Wikimedia Foundation, which include the Bengali Wikipedia and the Polish Wikipedia.
:[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 16:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
::FYI, English, Welsh (562,000) and then Polish (546,000) are the most widely spoken languages in the UK, (from the 2011 census) closely followed in order:
::#Punjabi 273,000
::#Urdu 269,000
::#Bengali (with Sylheti and Chatgaya) 221,000
::#Gujarati 213,000
::Scots is lagging with 100,000 speakers, which is on a par with Irish in Northern Ireland at 95,000 speakers. Whether this should or should not influence our projects is open to debate and interpretation. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 17:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
: There's an old page at [[Language support]], which could be a good home for this new table. with Fæ's numbers, I think the reference is [http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census/key-statistics-and-quick-statistics-for-wards-and-output-areas-in-england-and-wales/index.html]. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 18:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
::The number of Welsh or Gaelic speakers is irrelevant to this discussion, imho. The crux of the matter is that these two languages have an important '''legal status''' given through Acts of Parliament. Please read my preamble to this thread:
 
::Our Policy on Scotland must begin with the [[:w:en:Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005|Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005]] and [[:w:en:Bòrd na Gàidhlig|Bòrd na Gàidhlig]] who are responsible for Gaelic on behalf of the Scottish Government. Wales has similar, yet stronger, legislation (including the [[:w:en:Welsh Language Act 1993|Welsh Language Act 1993]] and the [[:w:en:National Assembly for Wales (Official Languages) Act 2012|National Assembly for Wales (Official Languages) Act 2012]]) which gave the Welsh language official status in Wales - and I suggest that we also include Wales in our Policy, under a separate heading. In Wales the [[:w:en:Welsh Language Commissioner|Welsh Language Commissioner]] ensures that ''"In Wales, the Welsh language should be treated no less favourably than the English language"'' and ''"Persons in Wales should be able to live their lives through the medium of the Welsh language if they choose to do so."''
 
::''Example:'' A person who wishes to speak in Punjabi at a Crown Court in Cardiff or London would be given a translator; a person who wishes to speak in Welsh at a Crown Court in Cardiff (or Caernarfon) would be given a '''full''' hearing through the medium of Welsh.
::Wales is a small nation, with few speakers of it's language remaining. Therein lies it's greatness and vitality, it's still live and kicking; WMUK recognises this, as well as it's legal status. Can I suggest we now move on by 1. getting the WMUK website's homepage up and running (I translated it a few days ago) 2. we continue to work on Rhys' plan, using it as a working document 3. we do the same with Scottish Gaelic. Then we pause for breath. [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|talk]]) 05:57, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:::I agree that it would be great to have the page translation tab thingy up and running for the main page at least (you can see an example of what the multiple translations looks like at [[:meta:WCA]]). As well as the legally recognized Welsh, which as Robin highlights should be a priority (and is easy for us to implement thank to Robin's commitment), it would be brilliant to find some additional volunteers that would enjoy helping with Polish and the South Asian languages (/me thinks of our special partnership with WMIN, I think Pranav is a member of WMUK, someone drop him a note!). I am keenly aware that if we can get some tame volunteers to regularly help with free translations, this is a great asset to our GLAM relationships. ;-) --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 07:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
::::I think [[User:Marek69|Marek69]] speaks Polish (he often attends the London meet up and I think he's a WMUK member).  I should point out at this stage that I personally have no strong language skills beyond English (although I have family fluent in Welsh and Polish, it's just not in my bailiwick).  Some other notes:
::::# I moved the template above to {{tl|languages native}} and created a sister temple in {{tl|languages immigrant}} based on [[wikipedia:Languages of the United Kingdom]].
::::# I added Manx to the native table on the grounds of "close enough".  I was a little worried when I noticed Old Norse and Norn Wikipedias in the incubator but they both appear to have been rejected, so I've left them out for now.
::::# I have hijacked/updated the [[Language support]] page Mike Peel mentioned above and included the two tables.  Since I was making tables anyway, I summarised to existing statistics on that page into {{tl|language stats}} and updated them. (These are all templates instead of entering the tables directly so they can be used on equivalent pages for each language and still only need to be updated once each.)  I hope the blurb around the tables, about legal duties and moral responsibilities, is OK; it was a little presumptuous but I needed to put something in there.  Please edit if not.
::::# I know I suggested using a subpage to indicate language (eg. "Main Page/cy") but would it be better to use the appropriate translation instead (eg. "Hafan")?  There are potential problem with this, such as the Scots translation of "Main Page" being "Main Page".
::::# Depending on the last point, is there any objection to [[User:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]]'s [[Llywelyn2000/Template/Main Page]] going live on "Main Page/cy" or "Hafan"?
::::# Llywelyn2000's suggestion of having volunteers answer communications seems worthwhile.  Would/Could WMUK keep a list of these volunteers as points of contact or for translation services?
::::NB: Apologies for not replying to this thread for a while but other things kept coming up. - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 11:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 
;Arbitrary break
The WMUK tech committee are discussing adding a translation extension on this wiki which will allow a Welsh user interface and make translating things into Welsh much easier, using a system similar to http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Translation. [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
:That would be good, and help support possible non-English speaking (or fluent) WMUKers. (Not to mention at least making them feel welcome and suupported by the chapter.) - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 11:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 
==Wellcome Collection and CRUK meetings==
 
I have arranged meetings next week with Wellcome Collection and Cancer Research UK (these are not linked, however both on 3rd May, London), and looking for a member of community that may be interested in attending.
 
Wellcome Collection meeting will look at options of future cooperation between the institutions.
 
Cancer Research UK will look at their recent external funding bid for a Wikimedian in Residence and see how we can improve it. Someone involved in the WikiProject Medicine may find this useful - at the same time this is an initial meeting focused on looking at paperwork and may not be of interest.
 
Any suggestions of volunteers that may benefit the meetings would be helpful. [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|Daria Cybulska (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|talk]]) 13:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 
:Good point about WikiProject Medicine. I have been bold and [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK|posted there]].  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 17:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
::Thanks for coordinating this. I am a Wikipedian in Residence at a United States organization which does health education. It is a bit early to plan, but if Wikimania happens in London in 2014 my organization may present there with a health focus. I work for {{w|Consumer Reports}}. In the UK the equivalent organization is ''{{w|Which?}}''. Our parent organization is based in London and is called {{w|Consumers International}}. I expect that neither Which nor CI know anything about me, but Consumer Reports in America would like for other English-speaking organizations to develop health content, so if you need to mention a precedent then CR could be one and we do sort of have a UK link. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="cursor:help"><span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span></span>]] 18:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
:::Probably! Let's revisit once Wikimania 2014 comes closer - looking forward to meeting you again! [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|Daria Cybulska (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|talk]]) 07:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
==Wikimedia Botswana==
Can anyone help Wikimedia Botswana with drafting their docs? (sorry for not linking it correctly)
*http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Botswana
[[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 15:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
::Possibly... it's rather complex, and would need an understanding of Botswanan law... [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
:::I thought that was something they trained you in at Wikimedia central, Richard. If there is nobody who can realistically help, that's OK. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 16:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== Draft 1 of 2013-18 WMUK Plan reminder ==
 
The discussion on draft one (to go to the board on May 11th) is hotting up.
Please contribute.
 
[[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] ([[User talk:Jon Davies WMUK|talk]]) 14:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Towards_a_five_year_plan_2013-18
 
:Yaris and I made some comments at [[Talk:Towards_a_five_year_plan_2013-18#Comments_on_the_draft_five-year_plan]] last week, perhaps these should be moved to be answered as part of the discussion, if these are to be addressed in a revised version in time for the board meeting? --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 14:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:: Will do - just hoping for few more before I have a go at it. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] ([[User talk:Jon Davies WMUK|talk]]) 08:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== 2013 Fundraiser ==
 
Just to let you know that we've received a note from the Wikimedia Foundation stating their intention not to renew our Fundraising Agreement with them for the forthcoming year, but leaving the door open for us to participate in 2014-15 after our recent governance changes have had more time to bed in. The Board will be talking about how this will affect our plans at the meeting on the 11th (if you read the reports that have been uploaded today you'll probably find reference to it) & I imagine we will upload their letter here before the meeting. Personally, while a little disappointed, this isn't something I will be losing sleep over: I think there continues to be a strong case for us to participate in the Wikimedia fundraiser in future based on what we can do with the Gift Aid received on donations, and on the use we can make of the email addresses donors give us, but equally this doesn't fundamentally affect our likely income or our ability to fulfill our mission. Regards, [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 19:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== Wikimedian of the Year award ==
 
Some of you may remember from last year Wikimedia UK AGM, we gave out a few awards to thank those in the UK or abroad who have helped the UK Wikimedia movement. The idea was that this is going to be an annual thing. In light of that, we would like to invite nomination for this year winners. Please add your nomination on [[UK Wikimedian of the Year 2013/Nomination]] by 5pm on 10 May. Thanks! -- [[User:Katie Chan (WMUK)|Katie Chan (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katie Chan (WMUK)|talk]]) 16:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== Gibraltarpedia is a success ! ==
 
Just came across this on Commons:
[[File:The Greeting At The Port 1.jpg|400px|center]]
--[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 16:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 
Well on a more serious note it has just passed the 900 new articles mark (which compares with last years top project which had 550 articles). If you download Layar on your mobile phone and point it at the image above then it will add an augmented reality button to the image which will tell you about Gibraltar in the language of your phone (without a QR code or a pound of charity money being used). Can someone check that this works? It only works with (most) Android and Iphones at present. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 14:49, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== How can the Board of Trustees measure WMUK's performance as an organization? ==
 
As well as being recognised for doing well on increasing our quantity and quality of events, hosting GLAMwiki this year and planning Wikimania in 2014, it is useful to set some key indicators with hard measures for the board to assess performance. I am raising the general issue on the Water cooler to encourage different perspectives, though I am aware that few of our members get excited about this sort of thing. :-)
 
One of the key performance indicators (KPIs) that I have wanted to see published for a couple of years, is the number of active volunteers. Back in July/August 2012, this was part of a board workshop and we estimated the number of active volunteers at 87. However growth has not been as expected, and current views are that the number of active members today, nearly a year later, might be marginally greater but not by much. No systematic way has yet been proposed for measuring and reporting this number.
 
Another useful figure is the number of members of the charity. As a table or chart showing the trend has never been published, I pulled this together at [[Membership/numbers]]. The trend shows that we rapidly increased, nearly doubling in size, from 2011 to 2012, but since the last annual report, we appear to have dropped in registered members by 20% (based on last month's figure). Out of interest, if we consider this a critical demonstration of the "value" of the charity (debatable, though the above total of active volunteers would be an excellent metric to use were it available), we can compare that to our funding, this can be shown as:
* 2011: £257k/165 members = £1,550 grant income per member [[:File:2011-12 Annual Accounts.pdf|ref]]
* 2012: £500k/330 members = £1,520 grant income per member [[2012 Activity Plan|ref]]
* 2013: £743k/272 members = £2,730 grant income per member [[2013 Activity Plan|ref]]
This shows that our spending in the last year has gone up by ~50% (or ~80% if counted per member head), whilst our growth in members (and volunteers) has not grown. ''Caveats: For 2011 I have only taken the grant income while in 2012, 2013 the activity plan has a figure that may include other income streams, in practice I don't believe this makes much of a difference when the trend is the important thing to assess. I am open to other suggestions of how to pick the best number.
 
It may well be that we can pull numbers together for increasing numbers of events and perhaps the increasing numbers of public involvement, or we could start to measure the benefit of creation of new public resources, such as the release of images from projects with The National Archives and the British Library. If basic KPIs such as members and volunteers continue to be slower to grow than expected in the charity's long term strategy, and yet the charity is seen as succeeding in delivering the mission in other ways, then we are short of verifiable measurements to give us balancing KPIs that show a more holistic picture.
 
One balancing factor that I kicked off in 2011, was to start our PQASSO quality assessment programme. This has been a modest success with the charity assessed at 'level 1' and we have plans to carry on to reach 'level 2', giving us good credibility for our policies and processes when benchmarked against other charities in the UK. Perhaps improved governance and quality may itself be considered a KPI? Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 
* Thank you for raising this topic Fae. It is useful to be able to discuss this and it provides an excellent opportunity to highlight some of the work that's happening in the office to improve the way we measure and monitor our activity. Perhaps the most important example of this is our quarterly planning grid. We use this to highlight some very top level activities and then monitor progress at quarterly checkpoints. These are then highlighted and monitored using the "traffic light" system. Given that our year runs from February to January we have just completed the reporting for the first quarter. You can view this as a [[:File:End_of_Q1_2013-14.pdf|PDF file on this wiki here]].
 
:Another aspect of our reporting and monitoring is our report to the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC). We use this as a key way of demonstrating the value of our work to the FDC and also to show compliance. This page sits on Meta and our Q1 report [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/WMUK/Progress_report_form/Q1 can be seen here.]
 
:Monitoring and reporting on the number of volunteers is slightly trickier. This is dependent on how we define a volunteer and I'm not sure that there has ever been a satisfactory definition. One way of monitoring this might be to review the activity on this wiki. I returned from my holiday today and reviewed the last couple of weeks in recent changes and noticed some new usernames making a contribution here so it appears, at least to that extent, that we are successfully encouraging wider participation. I can't back this up with numbers. However, we have the excellent Katie Chan working with us and she has the specific remit of broadening volunteer participation. I have no doubt that her work will bring great benefits.
 
:Regarding membership I do think that more can be done to recruit members and I believe that we will continue to improve. Many previous members have simply lapsed and some may have chosen not to renew because the charity has had a difficult year in terms of governance and press attention. Furthermore the only thing that we currently offer members is voting rights. This means that membership of our charity is not of great appeal to people who might otherwise join. It may be that as time passes we are able to refine and redefine membership to make it more attractive. If we were to do this I am confident that we would see a marked increase in charity membership. All this being said I don't see membership levels as being as important as the other metrics outlined above.
 
:I do hope that my comments are useful and I am of course happy to discuss this further. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 16:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
::Hi Stevie, you can see from the above that I was hoping for some alternatives to volunteer and membership numbers, as Key Performance Indicators that are currently being tracked so that the Board of Trustees use these to help our duty for oversight of operations and to assess the performance of the ''organization'' (rather than ''staff'') against our strategic goals. No matter how we re-frame the current measured trends, they are below any past expectations in our long term strategy.
::[[:File:End of Q1 2013-14.pdf|The quarterly planning grid]] is a good step forward in reporting, and contains a lot of detail. The column "WMUK KPIs if applicable" is a confusing mixed bag, as some of these are administrative service performance agreements, whilst others are statements of activities rather than measures (such as "Value for money checked when ordering"). To cherry-pick this list, it would be useful to have reports of easily quantifiable performance related figures such as "numbers of people taking part" and "new editors trained" for Outreach, and if these were reported to the board providing trends over a period of 6 or 12 months, it would be great to consider rolling these up as part of a high level organizational KPI. Though prospective numbers like this are listed in the quarterly planning grid, which covers the last 3 months, the trustees have yet to be supplied with any of the "KPIs" stated in the form of a simple report with numbers and trends rather than textual descriptions of activities. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 07:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
::: Morning! Not to put a spanner in the works, but a genuine thought re ' they are below any past expectations in our long term strategy.' - what were these past expectations? (Are they clearly articulated anywhere?) More importantly - in light of the last 12 months of challenge, are they relevant? Were they even realistic in the first place? We need to be careful to make sure that we're not comparing the reality of 2013 to pipe-dreams from when we were a smaller organisation in a considerably different position. This is why the five year plan process is probably a good place to thrash this out - because its based on consultation and consensus on where we really are now and what we can realistically achieve. Please don't see this as a suggestion we shouldn't be ambitious or set stretching targets - I'm pro that :-) [[User:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|Katherine Bavage (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
::::#In the Board workshop of 2011, you can find Andrew Turvey's (our Chairman) presentation [[Minutes_27Aug11/Presentations#Growth]]. This set a target for '''2013 of 2,000 members'''. At that time the Board of Trustees found that a realistic figure in the light of the fact that we were soon to appoint a CEO and set up an office with employees. That expectation shows we should have achieved six or seven times more members than we have today. You may wish to note that it was this scenario planning that Ting Chen gave us warmly encouraging feedback about. Were were a rare chapter that put forward and discussed strategy in this realistic way.
::::#In the 2012 Five Year Plan last year, we set a target of '''1,000 members within 3 years'''. [[2012_Five_Year_Plan#Members_and_Volunteers]] - Drawing a straight line, this means we should have around 400 or 500 members this year. We are more than 50% under this target.
::::#In the accepted 2012-13 FDC proposal there is a '''"Five year target of 2,000 membership"''' (i.e. to be delivered by 2016). [[m:FDC_portal/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/WMUK/Proposal_form]] Unfortunately this target is not meaningful to assess any current measurement against.
::::Significant growth in membership has always been a core performance indicator. The staff ought to be aware of these documented expectations of the board, if nothing else it would be a good idea to respond with helping the board and CEO set new realistic goals if these are unrealistic targets. Examining the historic pattern here, you may note that targets have been set increasingly longer distances into the future, and with declining expectations. It would be great if these became hard measurable targets for the year so the board could tell if the performance trend was sufficient or not, and to develop SMART actions and measurable plans so that performance review is based on firm foundations. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
::::: Quick point, but is that the same presentation that posited that we would end up with 700,000 members and an income approaching £60million per year? [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
:::::: One other point here. I'm currently reviewing the five year plan to 2018 which states that we aim: "To have 2,000 members, at least 25% of whom actively contribute to WMUK activities". I think that's a pretty clear and measurable target. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
::::::: Yes, Andrew's scenario planning was great fun. Certainly if I am still alive in 2018, I would look at the 2018 annual report with interest to see if it makes any reference to the current five year plan, or uses any of the targets. In the meantime it would be great if the board can work with non-subjective KPIs and credibly reported trends that we can discuss and review in 2013.
::::::: Let us be honest, if against any of our past expectations for the benefits of rapidly establishing our office, we have not grown the numbers of active volunteers in the last 12 months by any significant figure, and at the same time, the number of registered members has actually gone down since the last annual report, then we should admit that as a definite failure in performance by the charity, and now look to put a measurable and credible improvement plan in place that addresses these targets. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 12:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
:::::::: I think this is slightly disingenuous, honestly. There has been a small upward trend in membership since Katherine joined. The larger drop from last summer could be explained by a change in the way we record numbers although I'm not well versed in CiviCRM so can't be sure. I do know that Katherine worked very hard to cleanse the data when she joined to bring it up to date. One can only imagine how much our membership would have increased had we been active participants in the fundraiser. And we are seeing an increase in volunteers. We have certainly undertaken a lot of positive outreach work, including building relationships with institutions of global renown - and this is by no means hyperbole. Given the difficulties we've faced in the last year I think all things being considered we're doing OK and we have better things to come. There are plenty of reasons to be cheerful. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::Stevie, there are always reasons to be cheerful. I find it odd that you are so determined not to give one inch of room to the possibility that there may be something to worry about here. The fact that we can provide no evidence that the number of volunteers is growing or shrinking compared to last year, and based on your statement we are even unsure if the number of members of the charity has actually decreased or not over the last year (when using figures published in our annual report) would worry most other organizations. Do you accept that an improvement plan and some verifiable KPIs with trend figures being available right now, so that trustees can monitor operations might be a jolly good idea?
:::::::::: I'm not sure why you would consider it odd that I feel we have activity in place to encourage more volunteers to participate in our work and to increase membership numbers. I have total confidence in the work that's being done by staff and volunteers in this regard. On the topic of membership numbers from last year, all I can do is reiterate my previous point that I don't have access to, or understanding of, CiviCRM. As I said it may be that there was a data cleanse that meant that test entries or duplicate entries to the database may have been removed. I was actually writing from a personal perspective and not on behalf of anyone else. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::: "consider it odd that I feel we have activity in place to encourage more volunteers" - where exactly did I say that? No, don't bother, though I am saddened to see that you are not prepared to accept that <s>some</s> any improvement is needed, this is just distracting from my original point which was to ask for good alternative KPIs that the Board of Trustees could measure performance of the Charity against. If we cannot compare any reliable numbers for Members or Volunteers to compare last year to this year, then we desperately need other measurements that are reliable. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 12:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::I created this thread with the intention of having some views from members rather than only staff, hopefully there will be a few. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 16:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Slightly related r.e. performance indicators; following the Stamford outreach session I suggested some things we could do to improve our outreach follow up (mostly it seems fire and forget up to this point :P). Including:
* Build a proper "outreach" team of volunteers willing to lend support to groups
* Assign a specific volunteer to liase with the group we are giving outreach both before and after the event - to provide both on and off-wiki support.
* Have a follow up schedule to check on how groups are doing, provide further guidance and see who is editing what
In the case of Stamford I've not heard a peep since, and am not aware of any real follow up with them as a group. Despite a lot of enthusiasm in the room! I think if we had a proper schedule of outreach this would help us with more data points both for new wiki volunteers and active membership. --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 15:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
: I can help with regards to Stamford. I've been in fairly regular contact with them, particularly Dave Sones, who was the key contact and who initially contacted us regarding their project. He is a part of the local civic society. The key idea of their project was to basically rewrite all of the content related to Stamford on the English language Wikipedia. In the end, the project team decided not to go ahead with a wiki-based approach for a few reasons. Mostly, it was related to the idea that they couldn't maintain total control over the content but also related to the encyclopaedic nature of the content that is required by the community (citations and so on). There was an element of promotion / marketing within the project that wasn't appropriate for Wikipedia too, and the group accepted this. I believe Dave remains an editor on the English language Wikipedia which is good. I hope this is useful! [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
===Measurements for "keeping the volunteer at the center"===
At the Board meeting on Saturday, there was some discussion about how we can do better to meet our [[Volunteer Policy]]. This was produced so that our plans and strategy could be measured to see how well our aim for volunteers to lead the charity and be in the center of our activities was implemented.
 
As a quick and easy to do measure, I walked through [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/ the blog] this morning to pull some numbers of who writes the Chapter blog posts, here are some results for 2013 only, hopefully accurate +/- 1 post:
*Posts by volunteers:
** 9 with 2 of these posts being by volunteers in paid positions, such as a paid WIR post.
*Posts by staff from other organizations:
** 7
*Posts by WMUK staff
** 33
Many of the posts by staff were standard notices, or posts generally on behalf of the charity, which might be counted as from the Board of Trustees, or the sort of thing that volunteers or trustees would not be expected to write. However more could have been written by volunteers, which might indicate a lack of interest in doing this from volunteers, or that this needs more encouragement.
 
I think this would be an interesting figure to track the trend of, but I don't think it would be the best measure. It would be interesting to find long term figures for:
* number of projects managed or led by volunteers compared to those led by staff and paid volunteers
* percentage of the annual budget led by volunteers compared to the amount led by staff and paid volunteers
* moving average ratio of staff, volunteers and paid volunteers at events
These are just some rough suggestions, at the moment we do not publish any numbers or trends in order to assess the projects for how volunteer-centric they are, as far as I am aware. Any alternative views?
 
By the way, the Board does have a commitment to review the Volunteer Policy - ''"by the Board, in consultation with the Chief Executive and the community, on an annual basis..."'', so you can expect this to be part of a later survey or community consultation exercise this year. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 11:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== Need to kick-start WLM 2013 in the UK if it is going to happen ==
 
A few of us had a brief phone meeting about WLM 2013 over a week ago ([[Commons:Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_in_the_United_Kingdom/planning]]), but I can't see any on-wiki progress since.  If we are to run the competition in the UK this year, some hard work is now very much overdue.  We are already quite some time behind on the timeline (see [[Commons:Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_in_the_United_Kingdom]]).
 
It would be a shame if the UK missed out again, for the 3rd year running, due to lack of interest.
 
My understanding is that WMUK is fully behind the community in backing this, and presumably what is needed is some greater volunteer action.
 
I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but unless another volunteer is in the middle of doing something I will in the next few days post some additional planning suggestions on Commons and will also advertise there to to try to bring in more help, as we certainly don't have enough people at the moment.
 
Any thoughts? --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 14:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
:I think Katie Chan, Richard Nevell and WereSpielChequers are in the process of this - but I'm not sure who is organising it as a volunteer or as a staff member, or which other volunteers are currently involved. I think we already have the list of monuments done.... I'll prod Richard Nevell and get him to reply here. [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 12:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:There is a lot of value to be re-used in the work of volunteers last year. I suggest [[Commons:Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012]] and [[Wiki Loves Monuments brainstorm/Notes]] are good places to check, though I recall other discussions were documented which I don't have immediately at hand. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 12:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:Michael, by all means add some planning suggestions to Commons. As you know from the planning meeting where we recapped previous attempts, there was interest last but it wasn't capitalised upon. At the moment interest is building, and since the first planning meeting three people have [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AWiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_in_the_United_Kingdom&diff=96046917&oldid=94956830 put their names down] to help out, and encouraging more people to get involved is a good idea. I will check in with Katie on how we are doing against the timeline. It would be great to see Wiki Loves Monuments take off in the UK. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== Third Age Online Survey ==
 
We would like to invite you to take part in our survey among Wikipedia Users. This survey is part of the international research project “Third Age Online” (TAO). TAO aims at developing methods to activate and mobilize senior citizens to participate online and to improve their quality of life. In the framework of this project, this survey is executed by UNU-MERIT, a social science research institute of the United Nations University and the University Maastricht (The Netherlands).
 
The survey can be found at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/taowiki and is available in English, Dutch and German. It will query your activities, motivations and motives at the Wikipedia platform. We would appreciate it if you can fill out the questionnaire until May 15, 2013. This takes about 10 minutes of your time.
 
Information and contacts
If you have questions about the project or this questionnaire, please visit www.thirdageonline.eu or contact Stijn Bannier, Researcher
Maastricht University
T.: 0031 43 388 44 79
bannier@merit.unu.edu
 
I'm posting this because until now we have 350+ German, 350+ Dutch and just 7 English responses. Any idea to increase the English responses are appreciated.
[[User:Ter-burg|Ter-burg]] ([[User talk:Ter-burg|talk]]) 10:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
:Hi Ter-burg, I just tried getting hold of you on IRC but we seem to have missed. Is there any background of discussion with RCom ([[m:Research:Committee]]) for this survey? There are often concerns about the privacy of data collected and whether IP addresses will be tracked or used in some way. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 12:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
:''Addendum'' I did catch Ter-burg on IRC and they were not aware of how RCom could help. If I receive any later clarification, I will update this thread. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 13:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
==Program Evaluation and Design Workshop - grant to attend! - June 22-23, Budapest==
Dear Wikimedia UK members,
 
Re the Program workshop in [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/09/program-evaluation-workshop-budapest/ budapest this June]
 
Apologies for short notice, but Wikimedia UK is willing to fund a volunteer to go to this event.
 
If you are available for 22–23 June 2013 and would like a grant from the UK chapter to attend this then please email me in the next 24 hours with up to 50 words explaining why you and the chapter would benefit from this, and where you would be travelling from.
 
If you are interested in the UK bidding for a future workshop of this type then please say so here.
 
Regards
 
Jonathan Cardy
:GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums) Organiser
:Trefnydd GLAM (Galeriau, Llyfrgelloedd, Archifdai a llawer Mwy!)
:Wikimedia UK
 
::Thanks for the interest, we will evaluate responses and get back to the applicants. We've also had interest expressed in running a further session in the UK anyone else who is interested in that please comment below: [[User:Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)|Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Jonathan Cardy (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 
== [[Commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom|Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom]] is ready to go! ==
 
For the very first time, the UK will be competing in the annual [[Commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013|Wiki Loves Monuments competition]] in September.  This is a community-led effort, with support from WMUK.  A number of volunteers have already expressed interest in helping to organize the contest, but there is much to be done and many more volunteers are needed, both now and over the coming few months. 
 
If you would like to contribute towards making our first ever competition the great success we expect it to be, please visit '''[[Commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom]]''' and leave your name there.  Even if you are only able to offer us moral support, or want to take part as photographer in September, please leave your details anyway.  You need not be based in the UK to help.
--[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 18:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


==Jisc Wikimedia ambassador==
# Diverse content and contributors
As mentioned in a post on the  [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2013/04/jisc-and-wikimedia-uk-to-jointly-recruit-a-wikimedia-ambassador/ WMUK blog three] weeks ago, JISC are looking for a Wikimedia ambassador. From their advert: "Jisc invites tenders for an individual or organisation to be the Jisc ‘Wikimedia Ambassador' and run a nine month training and coordination project for the use of Wikimedia tools and techniques for educational purposes." If you're interested in applying, the deadline is at 12:00 on Wednesday 22nd May. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
# Promoting open knowledge
# Education and Learning


==[[:File:End of Q1 2013-14.pdf]]==
These strands are directly related to our three strategic goals, which are to:
The PDF linked in the heading is to the quarterly planning grid, showing our progress at the end of the first quarter. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 12:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


== Research position available via Wikimedia Germany ==
* Increase the quality and quantity of coverage of subjects that are currently underrepresented on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects
* Contribute to the development of open knowledge in the UK, by increasing understanding and recognition of the value of open knowledge and advocating for change at an organisational, sectoral and public policy level
* Support the use of the Wikimedia projects as important tools for education and learning in the UK
We would welcome input from the UK community into our plans for next year - which we are still shaping - and have created a short video to highlight our programme strands which you can watch [https://youtu.be/56s3Ch7sHbQ here]. You can give us feedback on our programme anytime, but if you’d like your views to be taken into account in our submission to the Wikimedia Foundation for funding, please do comment below by Friday 29th September. If you’d prefer to get in touch by email, feel free to contact me on lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk.


Dear Wikimedia friends,
There are several questions in particular that I’d like to ask:


thanks for the valuable input on the project draft for the Chapters
* Is there anything that Wikimedia UK should be doing more of, or new activities that we should consider, in 2018/19?
Dialogue[1] in the recent weeks and at the Chapters Meeting in Milan.
* What work would you like to see us continue?
I have now integrated the feedback and updated the Meta page
* Is there anything you think we should do less of or stop doing?
accordingly. The process is designed to be open and transparent, so
* How would you like to be involved in Wikimedia UK’s programme next year?
please feel free to comment on and enhance the description.


As of now, we are looking for a contractor (paid position, 6 months)
With many thanks indeed for your input.
from within the Wikimedia movement to design, realise and evaluate
 
this project. We are looking for an enthusiastic and motivated person.
[[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|talk]]) 13:39, 21 September 2017 (BST)


=== Requirements ===
== ACTRIAL and new users creating new pages at events ==
* Background knowledge of the Wikimedia movement
* Ability to shape and actively guide the dialogue
* Willingness and ability to travel world-wide
* Skills in inter-cultural communication
* Good written and spoken English skills, favourably also in Spanish
and possibly other languages
* Knowledge of project management and interview techniques
* Ability to work independently and remotely
* Attendance at this year's [[Wikimania 2013]]
* Experiences in survey design and data analysis are nice to have
* Be more of a story collector than a story teller ;)


Please apply until June 10, 2013 via email to
Hi All,
nicole.ebber@wikimedia.de and include


* a short motivation letter
Some thoughts on {{wp|WP:ACTRIAL}} and our events:
* an overview of your experiences in this field
*It makes sense to encourage new users to work in {{wp|Wikipedia:Drafts|Draft: name space}}.
* a short description (max. 1500 characters) of what your first steps
*This doesn't change the fact that it is worth asking people to create an account in advance (and to remember their password!)
in this project would be
*We have to expect that some people won't create an account and most of those who have won't be auto-confirmed - this is OK.
* your earliest entrance date
*If there are admins present at the event, they can make new users confirmed.... although I wouldn't stress over it - there is no harm in the Draft: name space.
* your time availability (full-time, part-time)
*All the above is less of an issue if we take the approach of [[#Training from the back of the room]] described above. If the group is split into teams that are deliberately set to have the full spread of ability, we can encourage people to help other team members, including the following:
**Middle-ability people to show the people with no account how to create an account.
**Experienced editors to help newer editors to find a page that might need editing.
**Experienced editors to create pages that other team members are interested in editing.
You could even get admins to confirm accounts of non-confirmed people in their team, but it might actually be better to not do that.  If the experienced people in the team have actually created the article then at least we know it is in their contributions and so they can steward the article towards improvement. e.g. 1. the day after the event, they might go back to the article and tidy it up, 2. if the article gets tagged for deletion, they are better able to discuss it and improve it, whereas a new user may feel bitten.


Find all the relevant information on the meta page. I am available for
[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 14:44, 25 September 2017 (BST)
all your questions and input, feel free to get in touch or leave
comments on the talk page.


Cheers,
:Obvious question, where do we find data on how many non-autoconfirmed users and IPs actually make pages that satisfy Wiki Criteria? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.141|82.132.237.141]] 15:31, 26 September 2017 (BST)
Nicole
::[[:meta:Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Analysis and proposal|According to WMF research]], of the 1,180 articles created every day on the English Wikipedia, about 7% are by non-autoconfirmed editors. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 16:55, 2 October 2017 (BST)
:Thanks for your input Yaris678. Working in Draft: or User: space is probably going to be integral to dealing with this. I've not used Draft: much myself, but I'm keen on getting people to use their sandbox to prepare material and then copy it over. It does mean a chunk of the pages people work on aren't copied over the to the mainspace but that's a reasonable trade-off. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 16:59, 2 October 2017 (BST)


:The [[#Training from the back of the room]] sounds like a really interesting idea, I'm interested in this kind of collaborative/peer learning process.  Sadly for the bulk of editathons I manage, this wouldn't be applicable, as I'm generally working with a whole bundle new users, trying to advocated for further use in their organisations. [[User:Lirazelf|Lirazelf]] ([[User talk:Lirazelf|talk]]) 14:07, 3 October 2017 (BST)
::Thanks Lirazelf. I guess you'll have to rely on the first four bullets - especially the draft namespace. I think it would be useful to have a non-new user move the drafts across.  Preferably during the training session, so people can see their work "live" on Wikipedia, which will create excitement.  Ideally, well before the end of the training so that people can continue to edit their articles in main space - seeing that this is a normal thing to do is important.
::I fringe benefit of this approach is that each article edited will be in the contributions list of at least one non-new user.  That way, they can "steward" the article to a certain extent.  This will be particularly important if the article is nominated for deletion - having someone who knows the ropes will help to get the article in a position to keep - and help to argue that it should be kept.  But more generally it will be useful, to keep the article quality up.
::[[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 12:59, 19 October 2017 (BST)


==Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2017 awards announced==
[[File:The Derelict West Pier of Brighton.jpg|thumb|1st prize: The derelict West Pier in Brighton, by Matthew Hoser]]
I am very pleased to be able to announce the 2017 award winners for Wiki Loves Monuments in the UK.


[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapters_Dialogue
First place goes to '''Matthew Hoser''' for his image of the derelict West Pier in Brighton.


== Why did you volunteer or become a member? Why should anyone else? ==
In second place was '''Paul Stümke''', who captured the Glenfinnan Viaduct at Loch Shiel.


Hi all!
Third was '''Oliver Tookey''' for the De La Warr Pavilion in Bexhill on Sea.


I've started a drafting page today (see [[Volunteer/Join us handout|here]]) to put together the content and ideas for a dual purpose handout the chapter can use to get expressions of interest from volunteers or potential members.  
The special prize for the best image taken in Scotland was awarded to '''Keith Proven''' for Smailholm Tower.


You can all help massively by dropping by and adding a sentence or two about how either volunteering and membership has led to interesting experiences, projects, or other outcomes. Also, I'm happy for use to draft section content - what would YOU say to get people to get involved?
The special prize for the best image taken in Wales went to '''Sterim64''' for Craig-y-mor.


There is no hard deadline on completing this, though I will probably be running around at the AGM session on writing the new members pack asking similar sorts of questions, so I would hope to see the first draft of that and this ready by the end of June!
You can see all of these images, and the other stunning pictures that were awarded Highly Commended status [[Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017_in_the_United_Kingdom/Winners|at Wikimedia Commons]].


Ping me on talk page or email me if you have questions - happy to answer and listen to advice :-)
Many congratulations to all of our prizewinners, and thanks to all who volunteered to help make the contest a success: contestants, judges, reviewers and Wikimedians in many roles.  Thanks also for the kind support we received from the International team, from our friendly staff at Wikimedia UK, and from our 2017 prize sponsors, Wikimedia UK and Archaeology Scotland. [[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 07:43, 31 October 2017 (GMT)


[[User:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|Katherine Bavage (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
== Effects of broadband ==


== List of UK meetups ==
Looks like BT wants to push more people to faster internet where it has fiber: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bt-group-broadband/bt-incentivises-operators-to-move-customers-to-faster-broadband-idUKKBN1KE0LR


I have just come across [[:m:Meetup/UK]], a page listing UK meetups. Could someone also transwiki the page to the WMUK site? WKUK should keep in touch with as many local meetups as possible. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 11:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Is someone monitoring the trend of average internet speed and the impact it has on user activity in the Wikimedia projects? [[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[User talk:Nemo bis|talk]]) 08:43, 24 July 2018 (BST)
:Hi Michael, several us endeavour to keep WMUK's [[events]] list up-to-date, including meetups. I agree it's extremely important for the chapter to keep in touch with these informal groups as there's a lot it could do to help them with their Wikimedia activities and they're effectively a ready-made supply of volunteers across the country (hint to any staff or trustees who haven't been outside the M25 for a while ;) ). [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''Harry&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  15:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


==Ada Lovelace 2013==
::Hi [[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]], I'm not sure that our small charity has the capacity to do something like this, or how it might benefit us. You are welcome to expand on why you think this would be a good idea if you like. [[User:John Lubbock (WMUK)|John Lubbock (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:John Lubbock (WMUK)|talk]]) 12:29, 2 April 2019 (BST)
Hi All, I am working on setting up an Ada Lovelace event for 2013 - for now together with FindingAda we are feeling the ground to see if there is interest for running small events WMUK could support (via a blog post [http://findingada.com/blog/2013/05/23/are-you-ready-for-ada-lovelace-day-2013/]. A while before there is progress, but if you are interested in helping get in touch. [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|Daria Cybulska (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
:Does my Y chromosome disqualify me? If not, I'm happy to help setting something up. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''Harry&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]]  15:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
::Not at all. Let me know what stage of organising you are interested in. [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|Daria Cybulska (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
:::Do you think it would be a good idea to get in touch with the Girl Geeks? This seems like something they'd be interested in.  [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 16:07, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:35, 13 August 2022

Welcome to the water cooler
This is a place to find out what is happening and to discuss our external projects and activities. Feel free to suggest ideas that could help our charitable mission or ask questions about how you can help. To discuss the inner workings of the charity, head over to the engine room.
WMUK Grants programme - a piece of cake?
Tile wmuk.jpeg
Applying for a grant is easy.

If Wikimedia UK can help you improve Wikimedia projects, check out our grants page.

Archives.png
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017

Kanban for editathons

A kanban board at the Women in Classical Studies editathon at Senate House, London

I just saw the newsletter with a picture of the kanban board used at the Women in Classical Studies editathon. What a great idea! It helps people share what they are working on. Helps to avoid edit conflicts. Enables organisers to list all the articles that have been improved. It could possibly work well for a recap session at the end too, where people talk about the changes they made.

Who was involved with that editathon? Who has used it elsewhere? I would love to hear how it has been used in practice.

Yaris678 (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2017 (GMT)

Hi Yaris678, I was the lead trainer at the Women in Classical Studies editathon. I saw the kanban in an Instagram post for an Art+Feminism editathon. It worked much better than expected - a fantastic indicator of the achievements of the day.Eartha78 (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2017 (GMT)
Cool. So how did you use it? Did you get people to brainstorm a load of post-its of articles to look at, at the beginning of the day? Did you just say 'if you have an idea, stick it on the board'? Did you come with the post-its filled out already? Yaris678 (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2017 (GMT)
The group were quite well prepared prior to the editathon. They had identified a number of articles to create - some had already done the research and started to writing in their sandbox. When we began the second part of the editathon they each committed to an article, wrote it on a sticky note and stuck it to the wall! Moving the notes from left to right was surprisingly motivating and a good excuse to stretch ones legs. Also used the sticky notes for an evaluation exercise at the end of the session. Eartha78 (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2017 (GMT)
Thank you Eartha78. That is really interesting. I will use this next time I do an editathon. Yaris678 (talk) 09:39, 19 February 2017 (GMT)

Wikimedia UK's plans for 2018 - community consultation

Watch our video about our plans for 2018

Wikimedia UK is in the process of writing our proposal to the Wikimedia Foundation for funding during 2018/19. The deadline for the bid is 1st October after which it is assessed by staff at the Foundation, there is an opportunity for community feedback and questions, and the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) meet to consider proposals and make recommendations about grants.

As 2018/19 is the final year of our 2016 - 2019 strategy, our programme for next year is in many ways a continuation of our activities in 2017 and falls under three key strands:

  1. Diverse content and contributors
  2. Promoting open knowledge
  3. Education and Learning

These strands are directly related to our three strategic goals, which are to:

  • Increase the quality and quantity of coverage of subjects that are currently underrepresented on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects
  • Contribute to the development of open knowledge in the UK, by increasing understanding and recognition of the value of open knowledge and advocating for change at an organisational, sectoral and public policy level
  • Support the use of the Wikimedia projects as important tools for education and learning in the UK

We would welcome input from the UK community into our plans for next year - which we are still shaping - and have created a short video to highlight our programme strands which you can watch here. You can give us feedback on our programme anytime, but if you’d like your views to be taken into account in our submission to the Wikimedia Foundation for funding, please do comment below by Friday 29th September. If you’d prefer to get in touch by email, feel free to contact me on lucy.crompton-reid@wikimedia.org.uk.

There are several questions in particular that I’d like to ask:

  • Is there anything that Wikimedia UK should be doing more of, or new activities that we should consider, in 2018/19?
  • What work would you like to see us continue?
  • Is there anything you think we should do less of or stop doing?
  • How would you like to be involved in Wikimedia UK’s programme next year?

With many thanks indeed for your input.

LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2017 (BST)

ACTRIAL and new users creating new pages at events

Hi All,

Some thoughts on WP:ACTRIAL and our events:

  • It makes sense to encourage new users to work in Draft: name space.
  • This doesn't change the fact that it is worth asking people to create an account in advance (and to remember their password!)
  • We have to expect that some people won't create an account and most of those who have won't be auto-confirmed - this is OK.
  • If there are admins present at the event, they can make new users confirmed.... although I wouldn't stress over it - there is no harm in the Draft: name space.
  • All the above is less of an issue if we take the approach of #Training from the back of the room described above. If the group is split into teams that are deliberately set to have the full spread of ability, we can encourage people to help other team members, including the following:
    • Middle-ability people to show the people with no account how to create an account.
    • Experienced editors to help newer editors to find a page that might need editing.
    • Experienced editors to create pages that other team members are interested in editing.

You could even get admins to confirm accounts of non-confirmed people in their team, but it might actually be better to not do that. If the experienced people in the team have actually created the article then at least we know it is in their contributions and so they can steward the article towards improvement. e.g. 1. the day after the event, they might go back to the article and tidy it up, 2. if the article gets tagged for deletion, they are better able to discuss it and improve it, whereas a new user may feel bitten.

Yaris678 (talk) 14:44, 25 September 2017 (BST)

Obvious question, where do we find data on how many non-autoconfirmed users and IPs actually make pages that satisfy Wiki Criteria? 82.132.237.141 15:31, 26 September 2017 (BST)
According to WMF research, of the 1,180 articles created every day on the English Wikipedia, about 7% are by non-autoconfirmed editors. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 16:55, 2 October 2017 (BST)
Thanks for your input Yaris678. Working in Draft: or User: space is probably going to be integral to dealing with this. I've not used Draft: much myself, but I'm keen on getting people to use their sandbox to prepare material and then copy it over. It does mean a chunk of the pages people work on aren't copied over the to the mainspace but that's a reasonable trade-off. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2017 (BST)
The #Training from the back of the room sounds like a really interesting idea, I'm interested in this kind of collaborative/peer learning process. Sadly for the bulk of editathons I manage, this wouldn't be applicable, as I'm generally working with a whole bundle new users, trying to advocated for further use in their organisations. Lirazelf (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2017 (BST)
Thanks Lirazelf. I guess you'll have to rely on the first four bullets - especially the draft namespace. I think it would be useful to have a non-new user move the drafts across. Preferably during the training session, so people can see their work "live" on Wikipedia, which will create excitement. Ideally, well before the end of the training so that people can continue to edit their articles in main space - seeing that this is a normal thing to do is important.
I fringe benefit of this approach is that each article edited will be in the contributions list of at least one non-new user. That way, they can "steward" the article to a certain extent. This will be particularly important if the article is nominated for deletion - having someone who knows the ropes will help to get the article in a position to keep - and help to argue that it should be kept. But more generally it will be useful, to keep the article quality up.
Yaris678 (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2017 (BST)

Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2017 awards announced

1st prize: The derelict West Pier in Brighton, by Matthew Hoser

I am very pleased to be able to announce the 2017 award winners for Wiki Loves Monuments in the UK.

First place goes to Matthew Hoser for his image of the derelict West Pier in Brighton.

In second place was Paul Stümke, who captured the Glenfinnan Viaduct at Loch Shiel.

Third was Oliver Tookey for the De La Warr Pavilion in Bexhill on Sea.

The special prize for the best image taken in Scotland was awarded to Keith Proven for Smailholm Tower.

The special prize for the best image taken in Wales went to Sterim64 for Craig-y-mor.

You can see all of these images, and the other stunning pictures that were awarded Highly Commended status at Wikimedia Commons.

Many congratulations to all of our prizewinners, and thanks to all who volunteered to help make the contest a success: contestants, judges, reviewers and Wikimedians in many roles. Thanks also for the kind support we received from the International team, from our friendly staff at Wikimedia UK, and from our 2017 prize sponsors, Wikimedia UK and Archaeology Scotland. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:43, 31 October 2017 (GMT)

Effects of broadband

Looks like BT wants to push more people to faster internet where it has fiber: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bt-group-broadband/bt-incentivises-operators-to-move-customers-to-faster-broadband-idUKKBN1KE0LR

Is someone monitoring the trend of average internet speed and the impact it has on user activity in the Wikimedia projects? Nemo bis (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2018 (BST)

Hi Nemo bis, I'm not sure that our small charity has the capacity to do something like this, or how it might benefit us. You are welcome to expand on why you think this would be a good idea if you like. John Lubbock (WMUK) (talk) 12:29, 2 April 2019 (BST)
Retrieved from "https://dev.wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Water_cooler&oldid=155821"