File talk:Mem News banner.png: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(vile font) |
(re) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The font used for the main banner is vile. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 23:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC) | The font used for the main banner is vile. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 23:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
: I think it's GillSans, the same one that's used in the logo. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 16:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::It might be nice to use something with serifs for the masthead. [[User:Rock drum|Rock drum]] ([[User talk:Rock drum|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rock drum|contribs]]) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:# *sobs* | |||
:# :-D Yes, it was GillSans, selected because consistent with logo, free licensed etc. Any alternative suggestions welcome - the banner was produced in Gimp if that helps? I'm not precious about this, so there is scope for a redesign competition, but I worry that entries might be problematic (not meeting the brand guidelines) but it could work? [[User:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|Katherine Bavage (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::Maybe something else in the GillSans family? [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 12:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:25, 1 February 2013
The font used for the main banner is vile. --RexxS (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think it's GillSans, the same one that's used in the logo. Mike Peel (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- It might be nice to use something with serifs for the masthead. Rock drum (talk • contribs) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- *sobs*
- :-D Yes, it was GillSans, selected because consistent with logo, free licensed etc. Any alternative suggestions welcome - the banner was produced in Gimp if that helps? I'm not precious about this, so there is scope for a redesign competition, but I worry that entries might be problematic (not meeting the brand guidelines) but it could work? Katherine Bavage (WMUK) (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe something else in the GillSans family? Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
