How the chapter works/Board approvals: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(begin new page, per discussion with Andrew Turvey)
 
m (→‎Categories: There seem to be five...)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is one of what will be a number of pages explaining how Wikimedia UK operates. This page covers the various types of approval that the Board gives to pieces of text. (The actual business of approvals of members is covered elsewhere.
This page explains the processes used by Wikimedia UK to approve various pieces of text, from the constitution and policies to blog posts and press releases. It is written for the guidance of board members, staff members and supporters of the chapter.


==Routes==
==Categories==


There are various routes to approval, including but perhaps not restricted to the following:
There are five categories of approval, as follows:


{|border=1
{|border=1 class="wikitable"
!Route
!Approval
!Comments
!Description
!Typical examples
!Examples
|-
|-
|Majority
|Two thirds majority of members
|Vote of the Board to approve or not.
|The core [[constitution]]
|Used for past minutes at the Board meetings, after changes that may be made in real time. Used for press releases.
|[[Articles of Association]]
|-
|-
|Two-star (**)
|Majority of board members
|72 hours notice of text to office list, and one Board member must positively approve.
|[[Article]] 28 Rules
|Current mechanism for the wiki version of newsletter.
|[[Conflict of Interest policy]]
|-
|-
|One-star (*)
|One board member +72 hours notice
|24 hours notice of text to office list, and one Board member must positively approve.
|text is provided to all board members, with opportunity to object
|Current mechanism for blog postings. In that case the Board member approving may be the author or poster.
|[[Newsletter]].
|-
|-
|Delegated
|One board member +24 hours notice
|No approval needed.
|text is provided to all board members, with opportunity to object
|Member renewal messages.
|[[Blog]] posts / press releases.
|-
|Individual(s) with delegated authority
|Delegated person(s)
|Member renewal messages; guidelines
|}
 
==Drafting==
 
Depending on the text, drafting may take place either on a wiki page or by email.
 
The advantage of using a wiki is:
 
* easier to edit the text
* all versions are in the history
* all edits may be commented
* the Talk page can be used
* drafts can be made in public (on this wiki) if appropriate, or in private (on the internal or office wikis)
 
The advantages of using email are:
 
* a single person keeps ownership of the final text
* board members are prompted to respond
* board members don't need web access to respond

Latest revision as of 11:09, 31 December 2010

This page explains the processes used by Wikimedia UK to approve various pieces of text, from the constitution and policies to blog posts and press releases. It is written for the guidance of board members, staff members and supporters of the chapter.

Categories

There are five categories of approval, as follows:

Approval Description Examples
Two thirds majority of members The core constitution Articles of Association
Majority of board members Article 28 Rules Conflict of Interest policy
One board member +72 hours notice text is provided to all board members, with opportunity to object Newsletter.
One board member +24 hours notice text is provided to all board members, with opportunity to object Blog posts / press releases.
Individual(s) with delegated authority Delegated person(s) Member renewal messages; guidelines

Drafting

Depending on the text, drafting may take place either on a wiki page or by email.

The advantage of using a wiki is:

  • easier to edit the text
  • all versions are in the history
  • all edits may be commented
  • the Talk page can be used
  • drafts can be made in public (on this wiki) if appropriate, or in private (on the internal or office wikis)

The advantages of using email are:

  • a single person keeps ownership of the final text
  • board members are prompted to respond
  • board members don't need web access to respond