Agenda 29Jun10/Chair's Report: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(upadte)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* AT to send around a more concise job description / responsibilities list for his job/role, via email - completed by email
* AT to send around a more concise job description / responsibilities list for his job/role, via email - completed by email
* AT to send SV notes from telephone conversation about SV's role - completed
* AT to send SV notes from telephone conversation about SV's role - completed
* JS, AT to draw up a proposal/plan for an [[advisory board.]] Need to have a clear idea of how the advisory board will be used. - completed see agenda
* JS, AT to draw up a proposal/plan for an [[Advisory Board]]. Need to have a clear idea of how the advisory board will be used. - completed see agenda
* Andrew to chase the auditor for details of what he needs to carry out the audit - chased Anand, who has come back now and said he isn't able to do the work for us - woudl you like me to approach a mainstream firm of auditors? {{discuss}}
* Andrew to chase the auditor for details of what he needs to carry out the audit - chased Anand, who has come back now and said he isn't able to do the work for us - woudl you like me to approach a mainstream firm of auditors? {{discuss}}
* AT to ask the foundation (via Sue) for advice on hiring low-level staff and writing job descriptions. - done, a/w response
* AT to ask the foundation (via Sue) for advice on hiring low-level staff and writing job descriptions. - done, a/w response
Line 13: Line 13:
* All to work on office manager job description on the wiki. - done
* All to work on office manager job description on the wiki. - done
* chased Pavel re the [[Toolserver Association]] working group
* chased Pavel re the [[Toolserver Association]] working group
* chased Guillaume re the usability project (see [[Budget 2010]])
* chased Guillaume re the usability project (see [[2010 Budget]])
* AT to judge WLA prizes - o/s
* AT to judge WLA prizes - o/s
* AT to respond to ORG re their grant application - o/s
* AT to respond to ORG re their grant application - o/s

Revision as of 18:37, 29 June 2010

Actions
  • Charity application: various calls, emails with board members solicitors; meeting proposed for 2nd July Dialog ballons icon.svg Discuss
  • TD, AT, MP: Update bank account signatories - a/w TD
  • Order new business cards for AT, MP, TD, SV, LW plus general information cards - cards ordered for AT, question about quality so I woudl like to wait until they've arrived before ordering more
  • AT & MP to talk offline about communications strategy - see agenda
  • AT to send around a more concise job description / responsibilities list for his job/role, via email - completed by email
  • AT to send SV notes from telephone conversation about SV's role - completed
  • JS, AT to draw up a proposal/plan for an Advisory Board. Need to have a clear idea of how the advisory board will be used. - completed see agenda
  • Andrew to chase the auditor for details of what he needs to carry out the audit - chased Anand, who has come back now and said he isn't able to do the work for us - woudl you like me to approach a mainstream firm of auditors? Dialog ballons icon.svg Discuss
  • AT to ask the foundation (via Sue) for advice on hiring low-level staff and writing job descriptions. - done, a/w response
  • AT to approach some agencies to find out the costs of using them to hire staff - done see email discussion
  • AT and TD prepare a report for the WMF chapters grant, for email approval, and to approach the Foundation to extend the grant - o/s
  • All to work on office manager job description on the wiki. - done
  • chased Pavel re the Toolserver Association working group
  • chased Guillaume re the usability project (see 2010 Budget)
  • AT to judge WLA prizes - o/s
  • AT to respond to ORG re their grant application - o/s