Friends' Newsletter/2018/Issue 02: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "left|thumb|1250x1250px == Welcome to the 2018's Summer Newsletter! == ---- == A Message from Interim Chief Executive...")
 
No edit summary
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:WMUK AGM 2018147 (43403004812) Newsletter.jpg|left|thumb|1250x1250px]]
[[File:WMUK AGM 2018147 (43403004812) Newsletter.jpg|thumb|1200x1200px|centre]]


== Welcome to the 2018's Summer Newsletter! ==
== Welcome to the Summer Newsletter! ==
Time flies when you're creating open knowledge! We are past the middle of the year already and have done a lot in the past few months, including holding our AGM, the Celtic Knot coference and making a lot of progress with many of our partnerships. At the AGM, '''Elin Griffith & Eiri Angharad,''' who set up Cardiff user group Wici Caerdydd won our Wikimedian of the Year award, and the University of Edinburgh winning Partnership of the Year. You can read more about all the winners [[UK Wikimedian of the Year 2018|here]].


----
The theme of the AGM itself was 'data'. We had a keynote address from Corey Stoughton, director of campaigns at Liberty, on the threats mass data holds for individual liberty and privacy. Helen Hardy and Laurence Livermore introduced the complexities of the Natural History Museum's Open Data project, and Gareth Morlais spoke on the digital survival kit for minority languages. You can watch the recorded livestream of Gareth's talk [https://www.pscp.tv/w/1OwxWWDZDDWxQ here] (as well as talks from Daria Cybulska, Derek Chan and others), Corey Stoughton's talk [https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lPJqkDQevLKb here], and the Natural History Museum talks [https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lPJqkDQevLKb here] and [https://www.pscp.tv/w/1RDxlWpjAbgJL here].


== A Message from Interim Chief Executive Sandy Balfour ==
We have lots of projects in the pipeline which we are hoping to tell you about soon, but we are very much looking forward to [[wlmuk:|Wiki Loves Monuments]] in September and the 6th anniversary of Wikidata in October. You can see all our upcoming events on the [[Events|Events page]]. We would also like to hear from our community if you're doing any Wikimedia projects, and always encourage you to write for our blog, as well as to look at the [[Volunteering Portal|Volunteering]] page.<span id="C1"></span><span id="C2"></span><span id="C3"></span><span id="C5"></span><span id="C6"></span><span id="C7"></span><span id="C8"></span><span id="C9"></span><span id="C10"></span><span id="C11"></span><span id="C12"></span>
'''By Sandy Balfour, Interim Chief Executive'''
==Wiki Loves Monuments is back!==
===Recording the UK’s listed buildings and scheduled monuments===
[[File:Royal Albert Hall - Central View 169.jpg|thumb|One of the UK winners from Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.]]
During September the annual Wiki Loves Monuments photographic contest returns to the UK for the fifth time, and we have [http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.uk a smart new website] that now looks good on mobile devices as well as on desktop.  The contest is open to absolutely everyone, and participation is completely free.  You’ll have a chance of your images being featured on Wikipedia, and there are also cash awards of up to £250 for the best entries. The 10 UK winners will compete against the winners from 50 or more countries for the top international prizes.


Since I started standing in for Lucy as CEO of Wikimedia UK, I have been doing some highly unscientific sampling of attitudes to the Wikimedia projects, and specifically of attitudes to Wikipedia. My sampling draws on the various groups with whom I interact in other parts of my life, which is to say people of a certain age who play tennis or bridge or who do crosswords or who have an abiding interest in Russia. [[File:Sandy-Balfour.jpg|thumb|Sandy Balfour on Bering Island]]Two things were immediately obvious. The first is the usage. Everyone – a total of twenty-three people – has at some point in the past month had occasion to refer to Wikipedia. All had found the experience satisfactory. All found what they were looking for, and none read more than a few lines. Most liked the slightly old-fashioned look of the pages. All found it easy to use. They wanted a date, a definition, a potted biography. They wanted it – and they got it – quickly, and then they moved on. The second is participation. Not one of those to whom I spoke had ever created or edited a Wikipedia page. None, in fact, had even thought to – not even those who have pages of their own. “It never occurred to me,” they would say. And when pressed: “It’s not that important to me.
This year we want to encourage diversity, and we have a special prize for the photographer who fills in the most gaps in our holdings - ie who photographs the most sites that are missing an image on Wikidata.   We also have prizes for the best regional images from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.


“But you use it?” I replied.  
Submissions are accepted from 1st September. Photos taken before that date are eligible - so get out and start shooting now, while the sun’s still shining (in most places…)


Well, yes, they did. But, they argued, if it wasn’t there they would use something else. And anyway, it seems like a lot of hard work. “What’s in it for me?”
Any questions, do please ask on [http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.uk/faq the competition’s FAQ page].  


Curiously only one the answer to the ‘what’s in it for me?’ question had traction. It was not that they could doctor their own entries or burnish their own reputations. It was the sheer fun and excitement of participating in something as extraordinary, and big, and immediate as Wikipedia. I doubt any are recruits to the cause – but then again… one evening last week I sat on the platform at King’s Cross with a very eminent scholar as he waited for his train to Cambridge. He looked in wonder as the minor edit we made to a page on which he is an expert went live. Ten days later the edit remains. “Extraordinary,” he said on the phone. “Quite extraordinary.
== Celtic Knot 2018 ==
[[File:Celtic Knot 2018 08.jpg|thumb|Robin Owain talking at Celtic Knot 2018.]]
This year's Celtic Knot at the National Library of Wales (NLW) in Aberystwyth was a great success. The conference was spearheaded by Jason Evans, the National Wikimedian at the NLW and was attended by an international contingent of Wikimedians representing the Breton, Basque, Catalan and Sami Wikipedias as well as some of the UK minority language Wikimedians from Wales, Cornwall and Ireland. Eluned Morgan, Minister for Welsh and life long learning, gave the opening speech of the conference, demonstrating the Welsh Government's support for Wikimedia UK's efforts to develop the Welsh Wikipedia and advocacy for open knowledge.  


It’s the right word. The Wikimedia project is something quite out of the ordinary, and I am delighted to play a part in it. It’s about time. I have been a heavy ‘user’ for years, but it occurred to me only recently that I should do more than use it. I should help create it. There is, after all, so much in it for me.  
Robin Owain spoke after the Minister for Welsh, and Ewan McAndrew, Wikimedian in Residence at the University of Edinburgh ran a translation workshop. Lea Lacroix from Wikimedia Deutschland also ran some workshops. Aaron Morris of Wici Môn addresed the impact of his work with school children and Koldo Biguri of the Basque Wikimedia user group spoke on the Basque version of Wikipedia for children, ‘Txikipedia’. You can see more about the speakers and workshops by reading Jason Evans' [https://blog.library.wales/?p=18164 blogpost] on the NLW website and you can see the full programme of talks on the [[Celtic Knot Conference 2018|Celtic Knot site]].


= Welsh Wikipedia reaches 100,000 articles =
Delphine Dallison, Wikimedian in Residence at the Scottish Libraries and Information Council (SLIC), has already published blogposts about the conference on the [https://scottishlibraries.org/about-us/news/celtic-knot-2018-preserving-endangered-languages-with-wikipedia/ SLIC blog] and on the [[blog:2018/08/celtic-knot-2018-how-can-wikidata-support-minority-language-wikipedias/|WMUK blog]], which you should check out if you want to understand some of the useful things that came out of the event.
[[File:Wikipedia Session Cardiff Univ 10.jpg|thumb|400x400px]]


[[:cy:Hafan|Wicipedia Cymraeg]], the Welsh Wikipedia has reached 100,000 articles. Welsh Wikipedians have been working hard over the past year to reach this target, which is a big achievement for a minority language Wikipedia. Wikimedia UK is committed to diversifying Wikimedia’s content and contributors and supporting the Celtic British languages, and reaching this milestone demonstrates the impact this work has had.
== International Wikimedia events roundup ==
[[File:Group photo, Wikimania 2018, Cape Town ( 1050886).jpg|thumb|Group photo at Wikimania 2018]]
At the end of May, the annual Hackathon was held in Barcelona, while Wikimania 2018 was held during July in Cape Town, South Africa.


Wikimedia UK’s Programme Co-ordinator in Wales, Robin Owain, has been a driving force behind the growing strength of the Welsh Wikipedia, along with National Wikimedian at the National Library of Wales, Jason Evans, and the many tireless contributors to Wicipedia. It’s been a long journey since the birth of Wicipedia in 2003, and you can see the most important milestones in this journey in our Welsh Wikipedia timeline video:
Programme Manager Daria Cybulska attended Wikimania and was selected to the Working Group on Resource Allocation as part of the 2030 strategy consultation. A big concentration of this year's Wikimania was on diversity within the context of the new strategy, with a lot of talk around minority and underrepresented languages and cultures. See for example [[commons:File:Bridging_knowledge_gaps,_Wikipedia_and_Bhutan_can_learn_from_each_other.webm|this presentation]] on Bhutan and Knowledge Gaps. 'I came thinking that we were the leaders in this field, but saw that many other groups were doing good work in this field', Daria said.
[[File:A timeline of Welsh Wikipedia 2003-2018.webm|left|thumb|700x700px]]
[[File:Bridging knowledge gaps, Wikipedia and Bhutan can learn from each other.webm|thumb|Wikimania presentation on Bhutan and knowledge gaps.]]  


Welsh Wikimedians have also recently established a Community User Group in Wales, Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru. This will be a separate entity to Wikimedia UK, but will work in close partnership with us. Robin Owain will continue to develop and manage Wikimedia UK’s programme in Wales, working with external partners and the community to help deliver our strategy with a focus on Wales and the Welsh language. As part of this role he will work closely with the User Group as to support and develop the Wikimedia community in Wales, facilitating and delivering partnership events and activities and acting as the key contact point between the User Group and the Wikimedia UK Chapter.
Wikimedia Poland was highly praised for a project working with ethnographers on minority languages in the South of Poland, and other projects working on recording languages, with the French chapter doing good work with Lingua Libre, and another project called [[commons:File:Facebook_Live_broadcast_of_presentation_"Every_Language_in_the_World_-_Introducing_Wikitongues".webm|WikiTongues]]. There is also interest in creating a Kurdish user group, potentially in Germany, which has a large Kurdish community.


=== Where next for Welsh Wikipedia? ===
Another big strand of the conference was on Fake News and media literacy. Governments across the world are being asked to do something urgently, and while this means there is the potential for hasty and problematic legislation, Wikimedia is being seen as one potential solution to the crisis.  
Welsh Wikipedia is already the most visited site in Welsh online, it is close to gender parity in its biographical articles, and it is highly integrated with Wikidata, so what is the next goal for the Wicipedia community? Jason Evans, National Wikimedian at the National Library of Wales, says that the focus will be on growing the Welsh-language editor community, securing partnerships with the education sector and existing producers of relevant Welsh language content.


“Not only is the Welsh Wici growing but the community of editors is growing. The National library of Wales will continue to support and encourage editors through events and training sessions and by sharing its own data openly for use on Wicipedia and beyond”, Evans said.
Another [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn4ivnVKPYQ keynote talk] focused on what the Wikimedia movement can learn from the Feminist movement. The Wikimedia Foundation's [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK_cUZLMpibyRiIdp0uF-lQ/videos YouTube account] contains many other talks from the conference.


Elsewhere in the growth of language Wikipedias, the Chinese (Mandarin) and Portugese Wikipedias are both about to pass 1 million articles, while English Wikipedia is over 5.6 million articles. Many people who speak English as a second language work on the English Wikipedia, meaning that it has far more regular editors than other languages. Wikimedia UK strongly encourages people who speak another language than English to help translate and improve articles into the other languages they speak so that people who do not speak English can access the same quality of encyclopaedic content that is available in English.
The organisation Whose Knowledge? is trying to work on unrecorded knowledge, especially outside the Western conception of what knowledge is. One Native American attendee related that the knowledge of her culture was being fractured, but that Wikipedia was allowing it to be pieced back together.  


Wikimedia UK is now looking forward to the [https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Celtic_Knot_Conference_2018 Celtic Knot conference], taking place at the National Library of Wales in July. This conference aims to bring together people working on smaller language Wikipedias, especially the Celtic languages of the UK, but also indigenous languages from other parts of Europe, to discuss how to improve and promote Wikipedia as an educational tool for minority language communities. If you’re interested in taking part, why not get in touch?
All the keynote speeches were filmed, and you can see them all here, as well as a presentation on the coolest projects the global community is working on.


= Why Non-Commercial licenses aren't useful =
In June, some of our Wikimedia community from the UK also attended the Wikimedia Hackathon, which was held in the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona without any funding from major corporations, and brought together developers and coders from around the world to work on tech projects to improve the user experience of Wikimedia projects.
[[File:BY-NC-SA-Andere Wikis.png|thumb|License image of the BY-NC-SA Non-Commercial license.]]
'''By John Lubbock, Owen Blacker, Stuart Prior'''


The other day, a friend of Wikimedia UK contacted us, asking if there was a simple explanation anywhere of why Non-Commercial (NC) licenses aren’t useful. He was trying to persuade a group who had released photos of their members on an NC license that they should make them fully Open Licensed. They were worried, he said, that someone could reprint, sell and profit from their photographs.
You can read more about the event on [[blog:2018/06/a-look-back-at-the-2018-hackathon-in-barcelona/|our blog]], and if you are a developer in the UK, we would love to hear from you about any projects you are currently working on. We give small grants for projects in the UK if you have travel expenses or other costs, so please do get in touch..


This fear of content being used in a way that the holder doesn’t agree with is a very common one, but largely illusory. It was something I encountered when asking the City of London Corporation for permission to go inside Bunhill Fields cemetery to take photos. I was refused because they could be used for ‘controversial articles about death’. It’s a conversation which often takes some time for the rights holder to understand why fully Open Licenses are better.
== Amnesty International and Bloomberg events ==
Wikimedia UK partnered with Amnesty International in May to hold editathons in London and Glasgow to mark the 100th anniversary of women's suffrage. The Glasgow event was held at the (Art Fund Museum of the Year Runner-Up) the Glasgow Women's Library, and saw the creation of articles for Cambodian lands rights activist
[[En:Tep Vanny|En:Tep Vanny]]
, Honduran journalist
[[En:Dina Meza|En:Dina Meza]]
, and founding Glasgow Girl
[[En:Roza Salih|En:Roza Salih]]
, amongst others.  


Unfortunately, some big funding bodies still advise their grantees to make the product of their work available on NC licenses, so here is a general guide for why NC licenses aren’t very useful, [https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/NonCommercial_interpretation#Choosing_NC_for_your_content expanding on some of the points Creative Commons make on their wiki].
We have been doing a lot of work to promote understanding of the #GenderGap on Wikimedia projects, which have far fewer female editors than male editors. Women globally have less access to power, wealth and education, so the gender bias of Wikipedia editors is not a huge surprise. However, since the community has begun to work on the issue, we have managed to increase the proportion of female biographies on the English language Wikipedia from around 14% to around 18%. Amnesty held a day of events to mark the centenary of Women's Suffrage in their London office, and we helped to run an editathon with guest speakers talking about their advocacy work. We trained dozens of female editors to create new articles on notable women human rights defenders and the day was finished with a comedy performance featuring a lineup of all female comics including [[:en:Shappi_Khorsandi|Shappi Khorsandi]].  
[[File:Amnesty International Wikimedia UK editathon 2018.webm|centre|thumb|800x800px|Amnesty International Wikimedia UK editathon (Maria Munir speaking at the event)]]  


The debate on NC licenses on Wikipedia goes back almost to the beginning of the site; you can see [[:en:Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy/Noncommercial-use|one thread discussing the issue in 2004]]. Wikimedia passed a [[:en:Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Non-commercial_licenses|resolution]] prohibiting the use of NC licenses in 2007 as being non-compatible with the [https://freedomdefined.org/Definition definition of a Free License], which allows content to be used for any purpose.
We also partnered with Bloomberg and the Mayor of London's office to host an editathon at Bloomberg's big London office. This was also to engage female students from London schools in learning to edit Wikipedia and creating pages on notable women from London. This was part of the Mayor of London's contribution to [https://londontechweek.com/ London Tech Week], addressing concerns about the lack of inclusion of women and black and minority ethnic groups in the tech sector, as well as on Wikipedia. Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, wrote about the editathon in the [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/need-close-wikipedias-gender-page-gap/ Telegraph], while the Mayor's head of technology stated in an [https://government.diginomica.com/2018/06/27/digital-leader-london-cdo-theo-blackwell-on-diversity-brexit-and-smart-city-priorities/ interview] that the event was the best thing he had done so far in his role:


The first problem to note is the ambiguity of the term ‘Commercial’. If you run a website that has advertising on it, you could not use an NC image on it, because it would be part of a commercial site. When people think that they want to prevent someone else making money out of their work, they probably imagine that person simply reprinting and distributing the work without attribution to the creator, but this would already be breaking the attribution clause of a completely Free License like [[creativecommons:by-sa/4.0/|CC BY-SA 4.0]] or [[creativecommons:by/4.0/|CC BY 4.0]].
‘The best project I’ve been involved in is sitting with young school kids from inner city schools doing Wikipedia pages to write successful women back into history that predominantly male Wiki editors never put in in the first place.- Theo Blackwell, Chief Digital Officer at City Hall


In reality, if someone is making a piece of content Freely Licensed, it’s unlikely that others will be able to commercialise it. If it’s on a ShareAlike license, the resulting content should also be on that license, and so would be hard to profit from. The other thing license holders should consider is whether it would matter to them if someone tried to monetise their content. Say you took a photo of a bridge in Wales that ended up on a calendar being made in China. Would it matter to you?
The event was also covered by the [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/12/sadiq-khan-london-mayor-calls-wikipedia-editors-cl/ Washington Times] and The Bookseller [https://www.thebookseller.com/news/perminder-mann-awarded-wiki-entry-help-close-sites-gender-page-gap-805116 profied] one of the women who had a Wikipedia page made for her during the event. We also made a short video so you can see what the event was like:
[[File:Wikipedia editathon at Bloomberg London by Wikimedia UK.webm|centre|thumb|800x800px|Wikipedia editathon at Bloomberg London]]


If the object is to disseminate the content more widely, it may not matter if someone did try to use it for a commercial purpose. In one example, we encouraged the [http://ukblacktech.com/ UK Black Tech group] to release [http://ukblacktech.com/stockphotos/ their stock images of black people in tech] on open licenses — the object was to get more images of black people in the tech sector online, so using open licenses even serves their purpose better.
== EU Copyright Directive voted down will be reconsidered in September ==
[[File:English Wikipedia mainpage 3 July 2018 with message about Netherlands initiative regarding 5 July copyright directive.png|thumb|Wikipedia displayed banners warning about the copyright proposals to European IP addresses in various countries.]]
On July 5, the EU Parliament [https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/5/17535874/eu-copyright-law-article-11-13-rejected-first-vote rejected] a new Copyright law that contained provisions requiring automatic filtering of content on internet platforms and a '[https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2018/05/08/eu-moves-closer-to-introducing-link-tax-no-exceptions-allowed/#192bf7d913c9 link tax]' that would see companies like Google and Facebook having to pay to link to press articles. Wikimedia UK wrote to all UK MEPs to argue against Articles 11 and 13 of the law, which would have taxed links to copyrighted material like news articles, and forced internet platforms to automatically filter content to reject copyrighted material.


If a record label wanted to release a photo of an artist that others could use for promotion or in news articles, it’s unlikely that someone would take that photo and try to sell it, when it already exists for free online. In the case of music labels, they already send the press photos of their artists to use in commercial publications — so why not release a photo of that artist on an Open License? One good quality image on an Open License would likely be widely used, and therefore give the music label some control over the photo many people would see of their artist.
Copyright holding bodies such as music industry representatives and news organisations like AFP were backing the proposals as they seek to turn around business models which have seen their profits slump as the internet makes it easier for people to consume content in new ways. Wikimedia charities came out strongly against the proposals, with Wikipedia going dark in countries like Italy and Estonia. On the English Wikipedia, banner advertising ran for a few days prior to the vote, warning users about the potential problems the new law could cause for Wikipedia and its sister sites.


We are not suggesting that a company should release the best quality or most commercialisable image of a particular person or thing, but music labels especially would be well advised to release a sample photo of each of their artists on an Open License so it can be used on their Wikipedia article. One way that the rights holder could prevent inappropriate reuse would be to release only a low-resolution version of the image, which would be good enough for a web page but not to be printed on a canvas. For Creative Commons’ [http://thepowerofopen.org/assets/pdfs/tpoo_eng.pdf The Power of Open], film-maker Nicolás Alcalá described using precisely that model for [http://www.riotcinema.com/ Riot Cinema]:
Copyright-holding groups were not particularly pleased about Wikimedia joining the fight against the law, with some trying to claim that opposition to the law was part of an orchestrated campaign by Google, who already have copyright filtering systems on sites like YouTube. One music industry representative [https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/1014786713980416001?lang=en in discussion with Jimmy Wales] on BBC Radio even called for the nationalisation of Wikipedia. No, we don't know how that would work either.


We assume that if you are a movie theater, an on-demand platform, a newspaper, or TV, you will need the high-quality version and reach an agreement with us. But if you’re a small amateur cineclub or a theater in a third world country and you don’t have the money to showcase the film, you can do it with the low-quality version for commercial purposes.
While the law specifically included a caveat stating that 'non-commercial' platforms like 'internet encyclopaedias' would not be covered by the law, the Wikimedia charities did not feel that a specific exception for Wikipedia was good enough. Another problem is that the content on Wikimedia projects, while published on Creative Commons licenses, is not 'non-commercial' because it can all be used for commercial purposes. So content would not be covered while on Wikipedia, but could be removed by copyright filters the moment it was uploaded to a different platform. 


One of the problems with the protectionist thinking of some rights-holders is the ‘lost sale fallacy’, that using free content equates to a loss of sales. However, it has been demonstrated that [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2005/jul/27/media.business filesharers spend more money on purchasing music and film] — because they are exposed to things they would not have otherwise discovered. Likewise, more information about artists being available on Wikipedia leads to people visiting galleries to see their works or buying books to find out more about information about artists.
In the end, the law was rejected by [https://www.siliconrepublic.com/enterprise/eu-copyright-vote-meps 318 to 275] votes. It will go back to the drawing board and will be reconsidered in September, hopefully with changes that protect the legitimate sharing of content online. In the meantime, Wikimedia UK is continuing its advocacy to MEPs to try to help them understand how the bill can be modified so that it doesn't pose a threat to a free and open internet.


Mike Masnick has written at length about [https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml the economics of abundance], with Cory Doctorow probably the most prominent of authors who [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/may/23/cory-doctorow-my-bright-idea release their work under Creative Commons licenses] — as Tim O’Reilly put it, “the problem for artists isn't piracy – it's obscurity”. Similarly Melinda Lee talked about using Creative Commons dual-licensing to that end with ''[http://www.uncensoredinterview.com/ Uncensored Interview]'' after having realised, when working at MTV, that opportunities had been missed due to lack of content rights. Their stock of interviews with bands and celebrities are available under conventional TV licenses but also under CC-BY, allowing reuse and remixing by anyone and the Share-Alike provisions have allowed Uncensored Interview to benefit from those resulting remixes.
== Scotland Update ==


And, of course, even if a rights-holder forbids commercial reuse, that cannot prohibit fair use or fair dealing exemptions from allowing someone to quote, satirise, parody or report on their works — in a commercial context or otherwise — with monopoly “intellectual property” rights having no ability to prevent that.
=== The University of Edinburgh residency ===
[[File:The beach, Portobello, Scotland, ca. 1895.jpg|thumb|Portobello beach in 1895]]
Ewan McAndrew is the Wikimedian in Residence at the University of Edinburgh. Recent Edinburgh residency events include: the Portobello Library editathon led by the University's digital curator, Gavin Willshaw; the Re(making) Middlesbrough editathon at Teesside University; the #Vote100 and Women in Medicine editathon(s) with Alice White from the Wellcome Library; the EAHIL conference 'micro' editathon led by Academic Support Librarian, Marshall Dozier; the ''Data in the City'' events at the Informatics Forum; and presenting on Wikidata and WikiCite at [http://libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk/repofringe18/2018/03/26/repositoryfringe2018/ Repository Fringe 2018].


There are always going to be occasions where some works don't make sense to allow for commercial reuse. Hollywood is not going to release the next blockbuster film on CC BY anytime soon. But that doesn't mean you should pick a non-commercial license off the bat either. Like any decision involving technology, consider your threat analysis before defending against those threats — think about what you're trying to achieve.
The University of Edinburgh's Library and University Collections has now included Wikimedia work in its [https://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/digitisation-strategy-v6.pdf new digitisation strategy] while WikiProject Women in Red editing has been included in the university's new four-year Athena SWAN plan. Ewan has also helped to create a new site on ''[https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/wikitranslation/ How to run a Wikipedia Translation workshop].'' Ewan ran a training session at the Celtic Knot Conference 2018 to encourage other attendees to run their own Wikipedia translation workshops, especially in education contexts with a view to supporting underrepresented Celtic and Indigenous languages.
[[File:Six in six.webm|alt=Six in six minutes - 3 students and 3 staff discuss Wikipedia in the Classroom at the University of Edinburgh|thumb|
Six in six minutes - 3 students and 3 staff discuss Wikipedia in the Classroom at the University of Edinburgh
]]
Ewan attended events like the Amnesty International ''Still Marching'' event in Glasgow on May 19, a meetup of open educators at the University of Coventry on April 17, and delivered 3 presentations at the annual Open Educational Resources conference in Bristol on 18-19 April including: a lightning talk on Wikidata in the Classroom and the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database project; [https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/Stories+of+Student+Empowerment+-+a+compilation+of+student+feedback+on+the+Wikimedia+residency/1_prhg9j4t Stories of Student Empowerment: a video compilation of student feedback on the Edinburgh residency]; and [https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/edtech-editathon/ the EdTech Wikipedia editathon]. Ewan also delivered Wikipedia training to Teesside University students, staff and members of the public on 27-28 April in collaboration with Sophie Nicholls, Head of Humanities at the university. Scotland Programme Coordinator for Wikimedia UK, Sara Thomas and Ewan did a joint presentation on Wikimedia Scotland collaborations at the Edinburgh Local Showcase event at St Cecilia's Museum, the first purpose-built concert hall in Scotland.


If you want to publicise your art, for example, perhaps a lower-resolution screen-worthy version can be spread far and wide without impacting your ability to make a living from selling hardcopies. If you're writing an essay for a collection, will it harm your income to loosen those restrictions a little — or might it mean that you get volunteer translations, for example, as Doctorow has seen.
Queen's University Belfast held a webinar on 3rd May where Ewan described the work of the Wikimedia residency at the University of Edinburgh, and some of the ways that Wikipedia and its sister projects are used to help students develop information literacy, data literacy and digital research skills. See a video [https://qub.adobeconnect.com/pjpu2x5f4p2y/ here]. New video tutorials have also been published demonstrating: [https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/Isabella+Skea+-+writing+the+Wikipedia+article+on+%22The+Lass+o%27+Pairts%22/1_jgbrxzn0/51020161 the process of article creation in 3 minutes], [https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/Moving+a+drafted+article+into+Wikipedia%27s+live+space./1_avxlpfzc/51020161 how to move an article from the sandbox to the livespace] and two new '[https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/How+to+Edit+Wikipedia+-+unabridged+version/1_xfvkg7pi/51020161 how to edit Wikipedia]' and '[https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/How+to+edit+Wikipedia+in+30+mins+-+2018+tutorial./1_q7ib92zf/51020161 how to edit Wikipedia (abridged)]' tutorials .'''<br>'''
[[File:Phoebe Traquair Murals at Mansfield Traquair Centre 1.jpg|300px|alt=Phoebe Traquair Murals at Mansfield Traquair Centre|thumb|[https://media.ed.ac.uk/media/1_14n6ozln Phoebe Traquair Murals at Mansfield Traquair Centre]]]
'''"''A piece of illumination enlarged – using OER for access and activism in cultural heritage"''''' was presented by [[:en:User:Ammienoot|Anne-Marie Scott]] at the 2018 Open Educational Resources conference in Bristol on 19 April was also added to the University of Edinburgh's Media Hopper video channel on an open licence. The case study explained how lessons learned using open licenses and Wikipedia in a University context are now being applied to make a physically closed listed building accessible through the creation of new digital OER and covers why openly licensed resources are particularly suited to facilitating awareness raising and activism, as well as supporting scholarship. The Arts and Crafts artist Phoebe Anna Traquair painted three significant mural schemes within Edinburgh. The first of these, for, remains the least well known and least accessible. In an 1899 interview Phoebe Traquair considered this to be her “finest piece of work”. The murals are also the sole survivor of around 20 commissions instigated by Patrick Geddes’ Edinburgh Social Union to improve the everyday environment through the artistic decoration of public buildings. However, this mural scheme faces an uncertain future. With the relocation of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children to a new building in 2018, the existing site has been sold for commercial development. One of the problems with public awareness is the location of the Mortuary Chapel murals. They have remained largely inaccessible for over 100 years as they form an integral part of an intimate and moving place. Generating widespread support and interest in their future is heavily dependent on accessibility; as works of visual culture they have most impact when they are seen. The most obvious way of making the chapel and murals more accessible, without being intrusive, is to make good quality images available online under open licenses. Until recently the only images that exist belong to NHS Lothian or Historic Environment Scotland. They are not digital and do not use open licenses. This case study covers the commissioning of a new set of digital images; open licensing and distribution via Wikimedia Commons; and the development of associated written materials. The talk covers why Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia were used, including the practicalities of working on these platforms and the broader benefits for education and scholarship. It also details how the relationship between Wikipedia and Google search can be used to particular advantage when considering discoverability of OER, access and awareness raising.


Think about what you are trying to achieve and how different licensing models can best help you achieve that while still leaving open the options for other people to build upon your work — just as we've all built upon the work of those who came before us.
[[commons:Category:Mansfield_Traquair_Centre|27 new images]] of the murals by noted artist [[:en:Phoebe_Anna_Traquair|Phoebe Anna Traquair]] have now been added to Wikimedia Commons. Ewan has also helped to improve coverage of Women Human Rights Defenders, Suffragettes and Middlesbrough on Wikipedia, Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedian and MA student at the University of Stirling, Lucy Rodgers ([[:en:User:LMRodger|User:LMRodger]]) has also helped create a new article on [[:en:Stirling_District_Lunatic_Asylum|Stirling District Lunatic Asylum]] and linked it to 23 other psychiatric hospitals in Scotland through the creation of a new [[:en:Template:Psychiatric_hospitals_in_Scotland|Psychiatric hospital navbox]] by Ewan.'''<br>'''


= Wikimedia UK Chief Executive Lucy Crompton-Reid has been published in a new book on Feminism and Museums by ''Museums Etc''. =
Law undergraduate student and Digital Skills intern, Jemima John, worked with Ewan and led the ''Law and Technology Society'' Wikipedia editathon focused on articles on intellectual property law. Jemima John then initiated a meeting with School of Law course leaders, Rachael Craufurd-Smith and Hector MacQueen, on 7 June 2018 to discuss how a Wikipedia in the Classroom assignment could be implemented in the Law curriculum for postgraduate students, undergraduate students (or both) to better support the students' digital research and communication skills. Wikipedia in the Classroom courses are planned in for September 2018 in Reproductive Biology Hons. (4th iteration) and Translation Studies MSc (5th iteration) while further events are being planned for more Vote 100 editathons, Ada Lovelace Day, Robert Louis Stevenson Day, Mental Health Awareness and Wikidata's 6th birthday.<br>
Lucy’s chapter is on Wikimedia and the Gender Gap and is is featured in Volume 2 of ''Feminism and Museums: Intervention, Disruption and Change''. Under an agreement with the publisher, we are allowed to share the chapter with you [[blog:2018/03/lucy-crompton-reid-on-feminism-and-museums/|<u>on our blog</u>]]


= How the music industry should engage with Wikipedia =
Ewan has recently co-authored a JISC case study and discussed the Wikimedia residency at the University of Edinburgh and offered guidance to those exploring collaborations with Wikimedia at the American University in Cairo, Teesside University, Coventry University, Queen's University Belfast and other institutions. This year we are also seeing an increasing number of colleagues run their own Wikipedia editing sessions to help build sustainability. Support was given to Gavin Willshaw to lead Library & University Collections editathons, Anne-Marie Scott to co-lead the EdTech editathon at the OER18 Conference making use of a resource to demonstrate how anyone can run an editathon quite simply; see the [https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/edtech-editathon/ OER18 EdTech editathon SPLOT resource]. He also supported Academic Support Librarians Marshall Dozier, Ruth Jenkins and Donna Watson to help prepare for their first editathon at the EAHIL Conference in July to encourage other health information librarians from around the world to run their own Wikipedia editathons using their own [https://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/eahil-editathon/ EAHIL micro editathon resource].
'''By John Lubbock'''


If I was a music industry promoter, I would make sure the artists I worked with had accurate Wikipedia pages, because those pages will come at the top of the Google rankings when you search for the artist’s name. In practice, this doesn’t happen, largely because they don’t understand how Wikipedia works or what its rules are.
You can find links to more of Ewan’s work on his two recent quarterly reports for 2018, [[:en:Wikipedia:University_of_Edinburgh/28th_Month_Report|Quarter 1]] and [[:en:Wikipedia:University_of_Edinburgh/29th_Month_Report|Quarter 2]]''',''' and the University of Edinburgh's [[:en:Wikipedia:University_of_Edinburgh/30th_Month_Report|30th monthly update]]'''.'''
A lot of people do not understand Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. These guidelines specify different notability standards for different professions. Here are the [[:en:Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles|notability guidelines for musicians]] to have a Wikipedia page:


Musicians or ensembles (this category includes ''bands'', ''singers'', ''rappers'', ''orchestras'', ''DJs'', ''musical theatre groups'', ''instrumentalists'', etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.
=== The Scottish Library and Information Council (SLIC) residency ===
[[File:Wiki enabled libraries map July 2018.svg|thumb|Wiki enabled libraries map July 2018]]
Meanwhile, Sara Thomas, our Scotland Manager has been meeting with Stirling University and Library about developing a partnership and Inverclyde Libraries to talk about changing their licensing policy. Sara attended meetings and gave talks at the newly launched [http://www.lifeindata.org/ Life in Data] project, spearheaded by University of Stirling, around data literacy, Scottish Higher Education Libraries’ AGM, CILIPS Summer Conference and the Edinburgh Local Showcase and Forum,


# <span id="C1"></span>Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are [[:en:Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources|reliable]], not [[:en:Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources|self-published]], and are [[Wikipedia:independent sources|independent of]] the musician or ensemble itself.
Scottish Libraries and Information Council Wikimedian in Residence Delphine Dallison has held successful talks with GSA Library about moving books held on Internet Archive to Wikisource/Commons. The National Library of Scotland are also working towards moving a large number of images from CC-BY to CC0/PD.
#* This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries ''except'' for the following:
#* Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.
#* Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories. 
#* Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
# <span id="C2"></span>Has had a single or album on any country's [[Wikipedia:Record charts|national music chart]].
# <span id="C3"></span>Has had a record [[:en:Music_recording_sales_certification|certified gold]] or higher in at least one country.
# <span id="C4">Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.
# <span id="C5"></span>Has released two or more albums on a [[:en:Record_label#Major_labels|major record label]] or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
# <span id="C6"></span>Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. Note that this criterion needs to be interpreted with caution, as there have been instances where this criterion was cited in a [[:en:Wikipedia:Verifiability#Wikipedia_and_sources_that_mirror_or_use_it|WP:CIRCULAR]] manner to create a self-fulfilling notability loop (e.g. musicians who were "notable" only for having been in two bands, of which one or both were "notable" only because those musicians had been in them.) 
# <span id="C7"></span>Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]].
# <span id="C8"></span>Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a [[:en:Grammy_Award|Grammy]], [[:en:Juno_Award|Juno]], [[:en:Mercury_Prize|Mercury]], [[:en:Choice_Music_Prize|Choice]] or [[:en:Grammis|Grammis]] award.
# <span id="C9"></span>Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
# <span id="C10"></span>Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and [[Wikipedia:Redirects|redirect]] to that article. Read [[:en:Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Subjects_notable_only_for_one_event|WP:BLP1E]] and [[:en:Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#People_notable_for_only_one_event|WP:BIO1E]] for further clarifications)
# <span id="C11"></span>Has been placed in [[Spin (radio)|rotation]] nationally by a major radio or music television network.
# <span id="C12"></span>Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.


The SLIC residency has now reached its 1 year mark, and the handover between Sara and Delphine of the role of SLIC Wikimedian in Residence is now complete. Delphine, who has volunteered with Wikimedia UK for the past 5 years and has attended our Train the Trainer programme, has started to organise editathons with library workers across Scotland, such as [https://twitter.com/delph_dallison/status/1019501461762342912 this one] at Dunfermline Carnegie Library.


An artist who may not have met the criteria for inclusion years ago may have since passed the threshold. The rapper [[:en:Frisco_(rapper)|Frisco]], a member of the important UK Grime label BBK, had his article repeatedly deleted between 2008-2010 because editors did not feel that he met the above criteria. His page was then locked from being re-created. Since then, UK Grime and the label he is on have become much more culturally important, and he has also released a number of albums, meaning he now meets the notability criteria. Because the page is locked for re-creation, an administrator will need to unlock it so it can now be made.
"From a pilot project led with public libraries across 4 local authorities, in the past three months, there has been an additional 43 librarians trained across 18 out of 32 local authorities in Scotland, bringing the total number of local authorities with public libraries engaged in the SLIC residency to 21", Delphine says in her[[:en:Wikipedia:GLAM/SLIC/12_month_report|12 month review of the residency]].  


Fiona Apps, a longtime admin I asked for help, told me she previously advised music labels who didn’t understand how to engage with Wikipedia.
She estimates that "by the next quarter report 11 different local authority libraries will be engaged in long-term Wikipedia projects". Beyond public libraries, there has also been interest from some school libraries and organisations that work in close partnership with libraries such as the Scottish Book Trust and the Carnegie UK Trust.


“They don't understand what makes a musician 'notable' under Wikipedia's standards but more importantly there's a complete misunderstanding of both what neutrality is on Wikipedia and WHY neutrality is on Wikipedia”, she said.
83.5% of the new editors trained during these sessions for library workers were female and a new train the trainer programme is in development to give librarians the necessary skills and confidence to run their own Wikipedia events. Inverclyde, North Lanarkshire and Dunfermline are currently setting dates to undergo this training.


“Things that are very much important in a musician's career simply aren't appropriate for Wikipedia and success is measured in reports from reliable secondary sources that are chosen by precise criteria that are separate from the music business. Wikipedia is written in language that is just foreign to the industry.
We are very pleased with the development of the SLIC residency, especially during the handover - the first that we know of for a residency - between Sara and Delphine. The residency is proving that Wikimedia and libraries can have an effective and inspiring partnership that gives library professionals new digital skills and mainstreams the use of Wikimedia projects throughout libraries in Scotland.


Apps also said that she would like artists not to send their fans to their Wikipedia page to ‘fix it’, as that would likely make the problem worse, and result in the page being locked. Instead, she advised music companies to ask Wikimedia UK for training.
=== '''Scotland Programme Coordinator''' ===
As reported in our [[Friends' Newsletter/2018/Issue 01|first Friends' newsletter]], the new role of Scotland Programme Coordinator has been taken up by Dr Sara Thomas, previous Wikimedian in Residence at Museums Galleries Scotland and the Scottish Library and Information Council.  Over the past three months, Sara has been working on supporting and developing existing and new partnerships in Scotland, including holding the first #ScotWiki partners meeting at the University of Edinburgh, bringing together some of those individuals and institutions who have supported GLAM and WiR work in Scotland over the years (and who are planning to in the future) for the purpose of knowledge-sharing and networking. She is supporting the development of more work at the University of Stirling's Library and Archives, has taken up a seat on the SLIC Residency Steering Group, met with staff from the SCVO to discuss joint working with WMUK, presented at the Scottish Graduate School for Arts & Humanities Summer School, and was absolutely delighted to receive an honourable mention for Wikimedian of the Year.  


One example I saw recently of an artist making all these mistakes provides a useful case study. Complaining on Twitter that @Wikipedia should allow his edits to his own page, the artist clearly did not understand how Wikipedia works. Sure enough, his page was a total mess of terrible PR speak. I have attempted to anonymise it as far as possible because this type of thing is not uncommon and he does not deserve to be singled out for ridicule.
== Updates from Wales ==
[[File:Example of non NPoV editing of a Wikipedia music page.png|left|thumb|1200x1200px]]
[[File:Portrait of 'Cadair Islwyn yn eisteddfod Caerffili 1874' (4672081) (cropped).jpg|thumb|A photo of the 1874 Eisteddfod from the NLW's portrait collection.]]
Robin Owain, our Wales manager has been working with Welsh-language broadcaster S4C, who have started to change their licensing policy on some videos on their YouTube channel. Preparations have also begun for Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Wales, and Robin has started a new [https://twitter.com/FfotoC Twitter account] for the Welsh part of the competition. Robin has also secured the release of [[:en:Eisteddfod|Eisteddfod]]’s archive of biographiess for at least the last 10 years (around 240 biographies) 


A new Wikiediting group, ‘Wici Pontardawe’ has been organised for 11 July 2018 in conjunction with Tŷ'r Gwrhyd Welsh Centre at Swansea University. Robin gave a talk at Maynooth University’s Academia and Wikipedia Conference in Dublin, and with Aaron Morris (WiR at Wici Mon), was involved in the organising of the Celtic Knot conference.


Meanwhile, Jason Evans, the National Wikimedian at the National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth has uploaded 4891 portrait images to Commons. These are pre 1880 portraits, mainly of British interest. The collection contains prints, engravings, paintings, photographs and more. You can explore the collection [[commons:Category:National_Library_of_Wales_Portrait_Archive|here]]. Following on from this, 5200 Wikidata items were created; one for each portrait on Commons plus a number of items for sitters and artists in the collection.


Obviously, the copy in this article is a huge violation of rules against non-Neutral Point of View (NPoV). This is why Wikipedia’s rules discourage people from editing articles about themselves or their employer. Editing pages of artists you promote and getting caught doing it is likely to get the page deleted or the edits simply removed. Instead, what Wikimedia UK would recommend is working with our editor community and collaborating to achieve consensus based on concrete facts with good references. You can also work with Wikimedia UK to organise training sessions that fans could come to, to learn how to make sure the pages of artists they like are as good as possible. We are here to support Wikipedia andwork with the community of volunteers, so please work with us!
40,000 statements were also added to Wikidata for Welsh Portraits and 350,000 Welsh bibliographical records (The sum of all Welsh literature) have been passed to Wikidata visiting Scholar Simon Cobb and are being prepared for upload to Wikidata. The Wikidata Visiting Scholar has created Wikidata for many Welsh newspapers and Journals using data provided by NLW. He will now begin to explore creating Wikidata for ALL Welsh books with associated printers, publishers and authors. You can find out more about Simon's work [[:en:User:Jason.nlw/Wikidata_Visiting_Scholar|here]].


For the past two years, I’ve tried to engage the MOBO awards on Twitter to encourage them to take an interest in the fact that many of the artists they nominate for awards have no Wikipedia articles, and when they do, they are often quite bad, many without photos of the artists. I talked to a couple of smaller music labels last year about the problem of artist photos, and the problem seems to be that labels have photographers who allow them to use their photos, but the label itself doesn’t own the photos, and a photographer is unlikely to want to publish a photo they can sell on an Open License.
Jason was interviewed by Radio Cymru discussing Wikipedia and the Celtic Knot conference and spoke at the Europeanna Tech Conference in May. He is also collaborating with CILIP Wales to create Wikidata for every Library in Wales. Jason also co-authored a chapter on engaging volunteers in libraries with Alex Stinson of the Wikimedia Foundation, for '[https://www.oclc.org/research/publications/2018/oclcresearch-leveraging-wikipedia.html Leveraging Wikipedia]', a book editied by Merrilee Proffitt, which has now been published. Lastly, Jason has been working with Europeana to trial the use of their new impact playbook in a Wikimedia based project. It will be one of 5 case studies Europeana publish later this year.


We desperately need more content by and about non-white people on Wikipedia. If you’re not of European descent, you’re much less likely to be adequately represented on Wikipedia. This is partly because the editors themselves are not particularly diverse. So the issue we have is how to engage new audiences to become Wikipedia editors?
== Dr Jess Wade recognised by media for her contribution to closing the Gender Gap ==
[[File:Jess Wade in Chicago.jpg|thumb|
Jess Wade in Chicago
]]
Dr Jess Wade, a physicist at Imperial College London who has taken part in numerous events with Dr Alice White, Wikimedian in Residence at the Wellcome Library, has been recognised for her tireless commitment to writing articles about notable women on Wikipedia. A flurry of articles have appeared following a profile in [https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jul/24/academic-writes-270-wikipedia-pages-year-female-scientists-noticed The Guardian] about her work, after she wrote more than 270 Wikipedia pages about women scientists within a year. Pieces on her work also appeared in [http://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/40770/1/an-academic-has-written-270-wikipedia-pages-for-women-scientists-in-a-year Dazed Magazine], [https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/27/health/scientist-women-wikipedia-entries-trnd/index.html CNN], [https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/scientist-pens-270-wikipedia-pages-in-a-year-so-female-scientists-get-noticed_us_5b574eeee4b0b15aba92c0d5?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_us=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_cs=q3VqfxgkFfF8ExV7bRw8sQ Huffington Post], [https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2018/07/25/cette-physicienne-a-cree-270-profils-wikipedia-de-femmes-scientifiques-contemporaines_a_23489303/ HuffPost France], [https://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2018/07/25/news/jess_wade_un_accademica_scrive_270_pagine_di_wikipedia_in_un_anno_per_far_conoscere_le_scienziate-202629665/ La Repubblica], [https://www.sciencealert.com/a-female-physicist-is-using-wikipedia-to-make-science-more-inclusive ScienceAlert], [http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/24/researcher-wikipedia-female-scientists/ Daily Caller], [https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Living/researcher-writes-270-wikipedia-pages-year-underrepresented-female/story?id=56787109 ABC] and [https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/07/05/ciencia/1530788593_072320.html El Pais]. She was also featured on the [[wmfblog:2018/07/13/jess-wade/|Wikimedia Foundation blog]].


One way to do this could be through music. Wikimedia UK can ask for press passes to musical events so that photographers can go to events for free in exchange for Open Licensed photos of artists who are performing there. As Fiona Apps mentioned above, we can also engage with the music industry to provide training for them to understand how to use Wikipedia.
Wikimedia UK is really pleased that Jess has helped to raise the profile of the Gender Gap issue on Wikipedia, and showed how there are many people including female scientists themselves, who are working hard to address the problem and encourage others to do so. The Guardian also published a [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/29/the-five-wikipedia-biases-pro-western-male-dominated short piece] talking about the other structural biases that exist on Wikipedia, following their article on Jess.


It’s important that artists who meet the notability criteria are adequately represented on Wikipedia, and if they are from a minority ethnic background, they’re much less likely to be. So we call on our community members to generate more content on artists whose pages lack photos, and on the music industry itself to engage with our community. Please check out the [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Black_British_Music|WikiProject Black British Music]] for suggestions on pages that need to be created. There are mutual benefits to be achieved which can help all of us, and expand the amount of free, open knowledge about notable artists.
It's clear that Dr Wade's example has already inspired other scientists and especially women working in STEM disciploines to consider going to or setting up their own Wikipedia workshops so they can learn to edit and help to reduce the Gender Gap. We strongly encourage anyone who would like to follow in Jess's footsteps to check out our [[Events|Events page]] for upcoming events in your area, or to contact Wikimedia UK if you would like help organising an event in your institution or area of the UK.


= Sara Thomas appointed Scotland Programme Coordinator =
== What is open knowledge? ==
'''By Sara Thomas, Scotland Programme Coordinator'''
By '''John Lubbock''', Communications Coordinator


[[File:Hiding wikimedian.jpg|thumbnail|On the way to Inverclyde to deliver training...]]
One of our main strategic goals at Wikimedia UK is to promote 'open knowledge'. [[:en:Open_knowledge|Open knowledge]] is the catch all term for content published on Open Licenses like the Creative Commons licenses used on Wikipedia and its sister sites. However, it can be quite difficult to promote something when a lot of people don't quite know what it is or why it's useful. A few months ago I thought it would be useful to make a short video explaining the history of Copyright, based on the History section of the [[:en:Copyright|Copyright]] Wikipedia article. Having written this out, it became clear to me that you can't understand how open knowledge came to be an important idea without understanding how is has become a reaction to the limiting control of commercial copyright on what you are allowed to do with others' content. A lot of content is not made to be commercially saleable, but because copyright is applied automatically, this can create problems. 'Orphan works' for example, that were not created for commercial purposes, are off limits for reuse until the copyright has expired, which is usually 70 years after the death of the author. If the author is unknown, however, as in the case of orphan works, nobody knows when they are technically out of copyright. Archives can continue to hold such content and charge money for their reuse, long after they may have become out of copyright.
The Scotland Programme Coordinator is a new role at Wikimedia UK, one which I was very happy to see advertised, and am absolutely delighted to be taking on. It's a significant investment by WMUK in Scotland, and I’m excited to get started!


Since becoming Wikimedian in Residence at [[:en:w:Wikipedia:GLAM/Museums Galleries Scotland|Museums Galleries Scotland]] in 2015, and then going on to hold the same role at the Scottish Library and Information Council last year, I’ve had both the pleasure and privilege to watch Scotland’s Wikimedia community grow and develop. Ewan’s residency at the University of Edinburgh is now full-time, and Susan has just recently completed her residency with the National Library of Scotland as Gaelic Wikimedian. My residency with SLIC is now at a point where we have the first public library services across Scotland starting to run editathons, and I’ve had recent meetings with both further and higher education institutions who want to know more about using Wikipedia in the classroom. It’s been obvious to me for a while that there’s a good deal of demand in Scotland for this kind of work, as well as significant scope for increasing volunteer engagement.
So please enjoy this short history of copyright, and feel free to reuse it, as it's completely Open Licensed. It's also available on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4CcSfdC-PQ YouTube here].
 
[[File:What is open knowledge? (A short history of copyright) by Wikimedia UK.webm|left|thumb|800x800px|
The role of the Scotland Programme Coordinator will be to support and encourage volunteer involvement in Scotland, as well as to support existing Wikimedians in Residence and partnerships, and pursue new relationships with partner organisations. I’m hoping to grow our network – particularly outwith the central belt – and encourage not only further participation in Wikimedia projects in Scotland, but to help to further the representation of Scotland in Wikimedia projects. I know that there are Scottish women who aren’t on Wikipedia who should be, and having worked in events and heritage – and travelled all over Scotland to do so – I’m keenly aware of the incredible store of knowledge that's held in Scotland's cultural and heritage institutions. I want to see more of it openly available, and I’m going to do everything I can to encourage its release.
What is open knowledge? (A short history of copyright)
 
]]
On a sad note, taking up this role has meant that I’ve had to resign my position at SLIC. I’ve loved working on this project and I’m very proud of where we’ve gotten to so far. But I’m really very happy to be handing over the residency to my replacement, who’ll be starting in just a couple of weeks!
 
===More===
* Read more about the SLIC residency [[:en:Wikipedia:GLAM/SLIC|here]]
* The University of Edinburgh residency [[:en:Wikipedia:University_of_Edinburgh|here]]
* Sign up to the Scot-wiki mailing list [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSctpnDjO_PHZeOTrA0yjtVLqE4oDfjLtYhWzQVTwk712BSJJQ here].
* Read more about volunteering with Wikimedia UK [[Volunteering Portal|here.]]
 
''When not involved with Wikimedia-related projects, Dr Sara Thomas has been/is a music venue manager, fundraiser, trainer, Event Coordinator for the Beltane Fire Society, Volunteer Coordinator for Mugstock Festival, Project Officer for Dig It! 2017, storyteller, writer, and Chair of a Community Arts charity.''
 
= Giving back to the Digital Commons =
'''By John Lubbock'''
[[File:Cambridge Analytica protest Parliament Square4.jpg|thumb|Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Chris Wylie at a protest in Parliament Square.]]
With the Cambridge Analytica scandal continuing to swirl in the background, both YouTube and Facebook have recently announced that they will start using Wikipedia content as background information about publishers and controversial videos on their platforms. [https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/24/are-corporations-that-use-wikipedia-giving-back/ TechCrunch] noted that,
 
‘Of course, this isn’t the first time Google has utilized the work of Wikipedia’s army of devoted contributors and editors — and the company is hardly alone here. In recent years, the site’s vast wealth of peer-edited knowledge has, for better or worse, become the backbone of a number of wildly used services — including, notably, smart assistants. Ask Alexa, Assistant or Siri who the Queen of England is, and they’ll all pull that information from the same place.’
 
Breitbart News, the far-right website run by ex-Trump adviser Steve Bannon, is [https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-breitbart-declares-war-on-wikipedia-in-facebook-s-fight-against-fake-news-1.5991915 especially unhappy] about this, because their Wikipedia page announces the fact that they have published material considered to be racist and misogynistic, and that ‘The site has published a number of falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories.’ In response, Breitbart’s fans have been trying to remove content from the page that they disagree with, and the page has been semi-protected.
This seems to be an example of the fear expressed by some Wikimedians that big platforms like Facebook are abdicating responsibility for the problems with their systems and trying to make Wikipedia the arbiter of truth online.
 
Looking at the [https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/24/are-corporations-that-use-wikipedia-giving-back/ largest donors] in the 2017-18 financial year, Google is the biggest donor with a contribution of ‘more than $1m’, around double Craigslist founder Craig Newmark’s $500,000 donation but smaller than the previous year’s grant of $3m from the Alfred P. Sloan foundation. These are not huge sums of money for a website that has the 5th biggest amount of traffic online. Google itself [https://www.androidauthority.com/alphabet-q4-2017-earnings-834774/ posted a revenue] of £110.8bn in 2017 [https://www.recode.net/2017/7/24/16020840/alphabet-google-business-stock-earnings-growth-cloud-revenue-profits-q2-2017 despite being fined] $2.7bn for privileging its own content in searches.
[[File:Transparent google logo.png|thumb|Transparent Google logo]]
If these big companies are not going to give back financially for the use they make of the Open Licensed content Wikipedia provides, there are other ways that they could help grow the Digital Commons, provide more transparency, and create more trust with their users by allowing them some choice over the license that content on their platforms is published under. I no longer upload any of my own photos to Facebook, because this gives the company a license to do whatever they like with my content. If Facebook allowed me to publish photos on a Creative Commons license so that others could use them as well as Facebook, I would be much more tempted to use the platform to share photos again. Flickr does this already, and I know from talking to an ex-Facebook and Instagram developer that both companies have built the functionality to allow this, but have not implemented it.
 
What is the reason for this? Apparently they think it might confuse users who already struggle with the complexity of the privacy and security settings. I think a more likely reason is that telling users what rights they are giving away every time they want to publish something would likely reduce the total amount of content those users share on the platform. But this is happening anyway. Facebook has been [http://fortune.com/2016/04/07/facebook-sharing-decline/ aware for years] that organic engagement and on their site has been [https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-business/new-study-finds-facebook-page-reach-has-declined-20-2017 in steady decline], reducing by 20% in 2017 alone.
 
As promoters of open knowledge, I think the Wikimedia community has something to teach Facebook and other commercial platforms about how they can win back the public's trust by being more Open and transparent with their users about what their rights are when sharing content. There is clearly a tension between making money and being trusted by users, but it feels like this is an issue that Facebook and other sites can no longer ignore, now that the conversation about how data is used (or abused) has become mainstream with the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
 
Data is derived from the Latin word 'datum', that which is given. Commercial platforms have a public duty to give their users information about how their data is used and what rights they have, otherwise the data they collect is not really being freely given. The consensual nature of this transaction, and the nature of the social (media) contract between the platform and users is something we all should think about more carefully.


[[Category:Friends' Newsletter]]
[[Category:Friends' Newsletter]]

Latest revision as of 12:02, 8 August 2018

WMUK AGM 2018147 (43403004812) Newsletter.jpg

Welcome to the Summer Newsletter!

Time flies when you're creating open knowledge! We are past the middle of the year already and have done a lot in the past few months, including holding our AGM, the Celtic Knot coference and making a lot of progress with many of our partnerships. At the AGM, Elin Griffith & Eiri Angharad, who set up Cardiff user group Wici Caerdydd won our Wikimedian of the Year award, and the University of Edinburgh winning Partnership of the Year. You can read more about all the winners here.

The theme of the AGM itself was 'data'. We had a keynote address from Corey Stoughton, director of campaigns at Liberty, on the threats mass data holds for individual liberty and privacy. Helen Hardy and Laurence Livermore introduced the complexities of the Natural History Museum's Open Data project, and Gareth Morlais spoke on the digital survival kit for minority languages. You can watch the recorded livestream of Gareth's talk here (as well as talks from Daria Cybulska, Derek Chan and others), Corey Stoughton's talk here, and the Natural History Museum talks here and here.

We have lots of projects in the pipeline which we are hoping to tell you about soon, but we are very much looking forward to Wiki Loves Monuments in September and the 6th anniversary of Wikidata in October. You can see all our upcoming events on the Events page. We would also like to hear from our community if you're doing any Wikimedia projects, and always encourage you to write for our blog, as well as to look at the Volunteering page.

Wiki Loves Monuments is back!

Recording the UK’s listed buildings and scheduled monuments

One of the UK winners from Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

During September the annual Wiki Loves Monuments photographic contest returns to the UK for the fifth time, and we have a smart new website that now looks good on mobile devices as well as on desktop. The contest is open to absolutely everyone, and participation is completely free. You’ll have a chance of your images being featured on Wikipedia, and there are also cash awards of up to £250 for the best entries. The 10 UK winners will compete against the winners from 50 or more countries for the top international prizes.

This year we want to encourage diversity, and we have a special prize for the photographer who fills in the most gaps in our holdings - ie who photographs the most sites that are missing an image on Wikidata. We also have prizes for the best regional images from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Submissions are accepted from 1st September. Photos taken before that date are eligible - so get out and start shooting now, while the sun’s still shining (in most places…)

Any questions, do please ask on the competition’s FAQ page.

Celtic Knot 2018

Robin Owain talking at Celtic Knot 2018.

This year's Celtic Knot at the National Library of Wales (NLW) in Aberystwyth was a great success. The conference was spearheaded by Jason Evans, the National Wikimedian at the NLW and was attended by an international contingent of Wikimedians representing the Breton, Basque, Catalan and Sami Wikipedias as well as some of the UK minority language Wikimedians from Wales, Cornwall and Ireland. Eluned Morgan, Minister for Welsh and life long learning, gave the opening speech of the conference, demonstrating the Welsh Government's support for Wikimedia UK's efforts to develop the Welsh Wikipedia and advocacy for open knowledge.

Robin Owain spoke after the Minister for Welsh, and Ewan McAndrew, Wikimedian in Residence at the University of Edinburgh ran a translation workshop. Lea Lacroix from Wikimedia Deutschland also ran some workshops. Aaron Morris of Wici Môn addresed the impact of his work with school children and Koldo Biguri of the Basque Wikimedia user group spoke on the Basque version of Wikipedia for children, ‘Txikipedia’. You can see more about the speakers and workshops by reading Jason Evans' blogpost on the NLW website and you can see the full programme of talks on the Celtic Knot site.

Delphine Dallison, Wikimedian in Residence at the Scottish Libraries and Information Council (SLIC), has already published blogposts about the conference on the SLIC blog and on the WMUK blog, which you should check out if you want to understand some of the useful things that came out of the event.

International Wikimedia events roundup

Group photo at Wikimania 2018

At the end of May, the annual Hackathon was held in Barcelona, while Wikimania 2018 was held during July in Cape Town, South Africa.

Programme Manager Daria Cybulska attended Wikimania and was selected to the Working Group on Resource Allocation as part of the 2030 strategy consultation. A big concentration of this year's Wikimania was on diversity within the context of the new strategy, with a lot of talk around minority and underrepresented languages and cultures. See for example this presentation on Bhutan and Knowledge Gaps. 'I came thinking that we were the leaders in this field, but saw that many other groups were doing good work in this field', Daria said.

Wikimania presentation on Bhutan and knowledge gaps.

Wikimedia Poland was highly praised for a project working with ethnographers on minority languages in the South of Poland, and other projects working on recording languages, with the French chapter doing good work with Lingua Libre, and another project called WikiTongues. There is also interest in creating a Kurdish user group, potentially in Germany, which has a large Kurdish community.

Another big strand of the conference was on Fake News and media literacy. Governments across the world are being asked to do something urgently, and while this means there is the potential for hasty and problematic legislation, Wikimedia is being seen as one potential solution to the crisis.

Another keynote talk focused on what the Wikimedia movement can learn from the Feminist movement. The Wikimedia Foundation's YouTube account contains many other talks from the conference.

The organisation Whose Knowledge? is trying to work on unrecorded knowledge, especially outside the Western conception of what knowledge is. One Native American attendee related that the knowledge of her culture was being fractured, but that Wikipedia was allowing it to be pieced back together.

All the keynote speeches were filmed, and you can see them all here, as well as a presentation on the coolest projects the global community is working on.

In June, some of our Wikimedia community from the UK also attended the Wikimedia Hackathon, which was held in the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona without any funding from major corporations, and brought together developers and coders from around the world to work on tech projects to improve the user experience of Wikimedia projects.

You can read more about the event on our blog, and if you are a developer in the UK, we would love to hear from you about any projects you are currently working on. We give small grants for projects in the UK if you have travel expenses or other costs, so please do get in touch..

Amnesty International and Bloomberg events

Wikimedia UK partnered with Amnesty International in May to hold editathons in London and Glasgow to mark the 100th anniversary of women's suffrage. The Glasgow event was held at the (Art Fund Museum of the Year Runner-Up) the Glasgow Women's Library, and saw the creation of articles for Cambodian lands rights activist , Honduran journalist , and founding Glasgow Girl , amongst others.

We have been doing a lot of work to promote understanding of the #GenderGap on Wikimedia projects, which have far fewer female editors than male editors. Women globally have less access to power, wealth and education, so the gender bias of Wikipedia editors is not a huge surprise. However, since the community has begun to work on the issue, we have managed to increase the proportion of female biographies on the English language Wikipedia from around 14% to around 18%. Amnesty held a day of events to mark the centenary of Women's Suffrage in their London office, and we helped to run an editathon with guest speakers talking about their advocacy work. We trained dozens of female editors to create new articles on notable women human rights defenders and the day was finished with a comedy performance featuring a lineup of all female comics including Shappi Khorsandi.

Amnesty International Wikimedia UK editathon (Maria Munir speaking at the event)

We also partnered with Bloomberg and the Mayor of London's office to host an editathon at Bloomberg's big London office. This was also to engage female students from London schools in learning to edit Wikipedia and creating pages on notable women from London. This was part of the Mayor of London's contribution to London Tech Week, addressing concerns about the lack of inclusion of women and black and minority ethnic groups in the tech sector, as well as on Wikipedia. Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, wrote about the editathon in the Telegraph, while the Mayor's head of technology stated in an interview that the event was the best thing he had done so far in his role:

‘The best project I’ve been involved in is sitting with young school kids from inner city schools doing Wikipedia pages to write successful women back into history that predominantly male Wiki editors never put in in the first place.’ - Theo Blackwell, Chief Digital Officer at City Hall

The event was also covered by the Washington Times and The Bookseller profied one of the women who had a Wikipedia page made for her during the event. We also made a short video so you can see what the event was like:

Wikipedia editathon at Bloomberg London

EU Copyright Directive voted down will be reconsidered in September

Wikipedia displayed banners warning about the copyright proposals to European IP addresses in various countries.

On July 5, the EU Parliament rejected a new Copyright law that contained provisions requiring automatic filtering of content on internet platforms and a 'link tax' that would see companies like Google and Facebook having to pay to link to press articles. Wikimedia UK wrote to all UK MEPs to argue against Articles 11 and 13 of the law, which would have taxed links to copyrighted material like news articles, and forced internet platforms to automatically filter content to reject copyrighted material.

Copyright holding bodies such as music industry representatives and news organisations like AFP were backing the proposals as they seek to turn around business models which have seen their profits slump as the internet makes it easier for people to consume content in new ways. Wikimedia charities came out strongly against the proposals, with Wikipedia going dark in countries like Italy and Estonia. On the English Wikipedia, banner advertising ran for a few days prior to the vote, warning users about the potential problems the new law could cause for Wikipedia and its sister sites.

Copyright-holding groups were not particularly pleased about Wikimedia joining the fight against the law, with some trying to claim that opposition to the law was part of an orchestrated campaign by Google, who already have copyright filtering systems on sites like YouTube. One music industry representative in discussion with Jimmy Wales on BBC Radio even called for the nationalisation of Wikipedia. No, we don't know how that would work either.

While the law specifically included a caveat stating that 'non-commercial' platforms like 'internet encyclopaedias' would not be covered by the law, the Wikimedia charities did not feel that a specific exception for Wikipedia was good enough. Another problem is that the content on Wikimedia projects, while published on Creative Commons licenses, is not 'non-commercial' because it can all be used for commercial purposes. So content would not be covered while on Wikipedia, but could be removed by copyright filters the moment it was uploaded to a different platform.

In the end, the law was rejected by 318 to 275 votes. It will go back to the drawing board and will be reconsidered in September, hopefully with changes that protect the legitimate sharing of content online. In the meantime, Wikimedia UK is continuing its advocacy to MEPs to try to help them understand how the bill can be modified so that it doesn't pose a threat to a free and open internet.

Scotland Update

The University of Edinburgh residency

Portobello beach in 1895

Ewan McAndrew is the Wikimedian in Residence at the University of Edinburgh. Recent Edinburgh residency events include: the Portobello Library editathon led by the University's digital curator, Gavin Willshaw; the Re(making) Middlesbrough editathon at Teesside University; the #Vote100 and Women in Medicine editathon(s) with Alice White from the Wellcome Library; the EAHIL conference 'micro' editathon led by Academic Support Librarian, Marshall Dozier; the Data in the City events at the Informatics Forum; and presenting on Wikidata and WikiCite at Repository Fringe 2018.

The University of Edinburgh's Library and University Collections has now included Wikimedia work in its new digitisation strategy while WikiProject Women in Red editing has been included in the university's new four-year Athena SWAN plan. Ewan has also helped to create a new site on How to run a Wikipedia Translation workshop. Ewan ran a training session at the Celtic Knot Conference 2018 to encourage other attendees to run their own Wikipedia translation workshops, especially in education contexts with a view to supporting underrepresented Celtic and Indigenous languages.

Six in six minutes - 3 students and 3 staff discuss Wikipedia in the Classroom at the University of Edinburgh

Ewan attended events like the Amnesty International Still Marching event in Glasgow on May 19, a meetup of open educators at the University of Coventry on April 17, and delivered 3 presentations at the annual Open Educational Resources conference in Bristol on 18-19 April including: a lightning talk on Wikidata in the Classroom and the Survey of Scottish Witchcraft database project; Stories of Student Empowerment: a video compilation of student feedback on the Edinburgh residency; and the EdTech Wikipedia editathon. Ewan also delivered Wikipedia training to Teesside University students, staff and members of the public on 27-28 April in collaboration with Sophie Nicholls, Head of Humanities at the university. Scotland Programme Coordinator for Wikimedia UK, Sara Thomas and Ewan did a joint presentation on Wikimedia Scotland collaborations at the Edinburgh Local Showcase event at St Cecilia's Museum, the first purpose-built concert hall in Scotland.

Queen's University Belfast held a webinar on 3rd May where Ewan described the work of the Wikimedia residency at the University of Edinburgh, and some of the ways that Wikipedia and its sister projects are used to help students develop information literacy, data literacy and digital research skills. See a video here. New video tutorials have also been published demonstrating: the process of article creation in 3 minutes, how to move an article from the sandbox to the livespace and two new 'how to edit Wikipedia' and 'how to edit Wikipedia (abridged)' tutorials .

"A piece of illumination enlarged – using OER for access and activism in cultural heritage" was presented by Anne-Marie Scott at the 2018 Open Educational Resources conference in Bristol on 19 April was also added to the University of Edinburgh's Media Hopper video channel on an open licence. The case study explained how lessons learned using open licenses and Wikipedia in a University context are now being applied to make a physically closed listed building accessible through the creation of new digital OER and covers why openly licensed resources are particularly suited to facilitating awareness raising and activism, as well as supporting scholarship. The Arts and Crafts artist Phoebe Anna Traquair painted three significant mural schemes within Edinburgh. The first of these, for, remains the least well known and least accessible. In an 1899 interview Phoebe Traquair considered this to be her “finest piece of work”. The murals are also the sole survivor of around 20 commissions instigated by Patrick Geddes’ Edinburgh Social Union to improve the everyday environment through the artistic decoration of public buildings. However, this mural scheme faces an uncertain future. With the relocation of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children to a new building in 2018, the existing site has been sold for commercial development. One of the problems with public awareness is the location of the Mortuary Chapel murals. They have remained largely inaccessible for over 100 years as they form an integral part of an intimate and moving place. Generating widespread support and interest in their future is heavily dependent on accessibility; as works of visual culture they have most impact when they are seen. The most obvious way of making the chapel and murals more accessible, without being intrusive, is to make good quality images available online under open licenses. Until recently the only images that exist belong to NHS Lothian or Historic Environment Scotland. They are not digital and do not use open licenses. This case study covers the commissioning of a new set of digital images; open licensing and distribution via Wikimedia Commons; and the development of associated written materials. The talk covers why Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia were used, including the practicalities of working on these platforms and the broader benefits for education and scholarship. It also details how the relationship between Wikipedia and Google search can be used to particular advantage when considering discoverability of OER, access and awareness raising.

27 new images of the murals by noted artist Phoebe Anna Traquair have now been added to Wikimedia Commons. Ewan has also helped to improve coverage of Women Human Rights Defenders, Suffragettes and Middlesbrough on Wikipedia, Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedian and MA student at the University of Stirling, Lucy Rodgers (User:LMRodger) has also helped create a new article on Stirling District Lunatic Asylum and linked it to 23 other psychiatric hospitals in Scotland through the creation of a new Psychiatric hospital navbox by Ewan.

Law undergraduate student and Digital Skills intern, Jemima John, worked with Ewan and led the Law and Technology Society Wikipedia editathon focused on articles on intellectual property law. Jemima John then initiated a meeting with School of Law course leaders, Rachael Craufurd-Smith and Hector MacQueen, on 7 June 2018 to discuss how a Wikipedia in the Classroom assignment could be implemented in the Law curriculum for postgraduate students, undergraduate students (or both) to better support the students' digital research and communication skills. Wikipedia in the Classroom courses are planned in for September 2018 in Reproductive Biology Hons. (4th iteration) and Translation Studies MSc (5th iteration) while further events are being planned for more Vote 100 editathons, Ada Lovelace Day, Robert Louis Stevenson Day, Mental Health Awareness and Wikidata's 6th birthday.

Ewan has recently co-authored a JISC case study and discussed the Wikimedia residency at the University of Edinburgh and offered guidance to those exploring collaborations with Wikimedia at the American University in Cairo, Teesside University, Coventry University, Queen's University Belfast and other institutions. This year we are also seeing an increasing number of colleagues run their own Wikipedia editing sessions to help build sustainability. Support was given to Gavin Willshaw to lead Library & University Collections editathons, Anne-Marie Scott to co-lead the EdTech editathon at the OER18 Conference making use of a resource to demonstrate how anyone can run an editathon quite simply; see the OER18 EdTech editathon SPLOT resource. He also supported Academic Support Librarians Marshall Dozier, Ruth Jenkins and Donna Watson to help prepare for their first editathon at the EAHIL Conference in July to encourage other health information librarians from around the world to run their own Wikipedia editathons using their own EAHIL micro editathon resource.

You can find links to more of Ewan’s work on his two recent quarterly reports for 2018, Quarter 1 and Quarter 2, and the University of Edinburgh's 30th monthly update.

The Scottish Library and Information Council (SLIC) residency

Wiki enabled libraries map July 2018

Meanwhile, Sara Thomas, our Scotland Manager has been meeting with Stirling University and Library about developing a partnership and Inverclyde Libraries to talk about changing their licensing policy. Sara attended meetings and gave talks at the newly launched Life in Data project, spearheaded by University of Stirling, around data literacy, Scottish Higher Education Libraries’ AGM, CILIPS Summer Conference and the Edinburgh Local Showcase and Forum,

Scottish Libraries and Information Council Wikimedian in Residence Delphine Dallison has held successful talks with GSA Library about moving books held on Internet Archive to Wikisource/Commons. The National Library of Scotland are also working towards moving a large number of images from CC-BY to CC0/PD.

The SLIC residency has now reached its 1 year mark, and the handover between Sara and Delphine of the role of SLIC Wikimedian in Residence is now complete. Delphine, who has volunteered with Wikimedia UK for the past 5 years and has attended our Train the Trainer programme, has started to organise editathons with library workers across Scotland, such as this one at Dunfermline Carnegie Library.

"From a pilot project led with public libraries across 4 local authorities, in the past three months, there has been an additional 43 librarians trained across 18 out of 32 local authorities in Scotland, bringing the total number of local authorities with public libraries engaged in the SLIC residency to 21", Delphine says in her12 month review of the residency.

She estimates that "by the next quarter report 11 different local authority libraries will be engaged in long-term Wikipedia projects". Beyond public libraries, there has also been interest from some school libraries and organisations that work in close partnership with libraries such as the Scottish Book Trust and the Carnegie UK Trust.

83.5% of the new editors trained during these sessions for library workers were female and a new train the trainer programme is in development to give librarians the necessary skills and confidence to run their own Wikipedia events. Inverclyde, North Lanarkshire and Dunfermline are currently setting dates to undergo this training.

We are very pleased with the development of the SLIC residency, especially during the handover - the first that we know of for a residency - between Sara and Delphine. The residency is proving that Wikimedia and libraries can have an effective and inspiring partnership that gives library professionals new digital skills and mainstreams the use of Wikimedia projects throughout libraries in Scotland.

Scotland Programme Coordinator

As reported in our first Friends' newsletter, the new role of Scotland Programme Coordinator has been taken up by Dr Sara Thomas, previous Wikimedian in Residence at Museums Galleries Scotland and the Scottish Library and Information Council. Over the past three months, Sara has been working on supporting and developing existing and new partnerships in Scotland, including holding the first #ScotWiki partners meeting at the University of Edinburgh, bringing together some of those individuals and institutions who have supported GLAM and WiR work in Scotland over the years (and who are planning to in the future) for the purpose of knowledge-sharing and networking. She is supporting the development of more work at the University of Stirling's Library and Archives, has taken up a seat on the SLIC Residency Steering Group, met with staff from the SCVO to discuss joint working with WMUK, presented at the Scottish Graduate School for Arts & Humanities Summer School, and was absolutely delighted to receive an honourable mention for Wikimedian of the Year.

Updates from Wales

A photo of the 1874 Eisteddfod from the NLW's portrait collection.

Robin Owain, our Wales manager has been working with Welsh-language broadcaster S4C, who have started to change their licensing policy on some videos on their YouTube channel. Preparations have also begun for Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Wales, and Robin has started a new Twitter account for the Welsh part of the competition. Robin has also secured the release of Eisteddfod’s archive of biographiess for at least the last 10 years (around 240 biographies)

A new Wikiediting group, ‘Wici Pontardawe’ has been organised for 11 July 2018 in conjunction with Tŷ'r Gwrhyd Welsh Centre at Swansea University. Robin gave a talk at Maynooth University’s Academia and Wikipedia Conference in Dublin, and with Aaron Morris (WiR at Wici Mon), was involved in the organising of the Celtic Knot conference.

Meanwhile, Jason Evans, the National Wikimedian at the National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth has uploaded 4891 portrait images to Commons. These are pre 1880 portraits, mainly of British interest. The collection contains prints, engravings, paintings, photographs and more. You can explore the collection here. Following on from this, 5200 Wikidata items were created; one for each portrait on Commons plus a number of items for sitters and artists in the collection.

40,000 statements were also added to Wikidata for Welsh Portraits and 350,000 Welsh bibliographical records (The sum of all Welsh literature) have been passed to Wikidata visiting Scholar Simon Cobb and are being prepared for upload to Wikidata. The Wikidata Visiting Scholar has created Wikidata for many Welsh newspapers and Journals using data provided by NLW. He will now begin to explore creating Wikidata for ALL Welsh books with associated printers, publishers and authors. You can find out more about Simon's work here.

Jason was interviewed by Radio Cymru discussing Wikipedia and the Celtic Knot conference and spoke at the Europeanna Tech Conference in May. He is also collaborating with CILIP Wales to create Wikidata for every Library in Wales. Jason also co-authored a chapter on engaging volunteers in libraries with Alex Stinson of the Wikimedia Foundation, for 'Leveraging Wikipedia', a book editied by Merrilee Proffitt, which has now been published. Lastly, Jason has been working with Europeana to trial the use of their new impact playbook in a Wikimedia based project. It will be one of 5 case studies Europeana publish later this year.

Dr Jess Wade recognised by media for her contribution to closing the Gender Gap

File:Jess Wade in Chicago.jpg
Jess Wade in Chicago

Dr Jess Wade, a physicist at Imperial College London who has taken part in numerous events with Dr Alice White, Wikimedian in Residence at the Wellcome Library, has been recognised for her tireless commitment to writing articles about notable women on Wikipedia. A flurry of articles have appeared following a profile in The Guardian about her work, after she wrote more than 270 Wikipedia pages about women scientists within a year. Pieces on her work also appeared in Dazed Magazine, CNN, Huffington Post, HuffPost France, La Repubblica, ScienceAlert, Daily Caller, ABC and El Pais. She was also featured on the Wikimedia Foundation blog.

Wikimedia UK is really pleased that Jess has helped to raise the profile of the Gender Gap issue on Wikipedia, and showed how there are many people including female scientists themselves, who are working hard to address the problem and encourage others to do so. The Guardian also published a short piece talking about the other structural biases that exist on Wikipedia, following their article on Jess.

It's clear that Dr Wade's example has already inspired other scientists and especially women working in STEM disciploines to consider going to or setting up their own Wikipedia workshops so they can learn to edit and help to reduce the Gender Gap. We strongly encourage anyone who would like to follow in Jess's footsteps to check out our Events page for upcoming events in your area, or to contact Wikimedia UK if you would like help organising an event in your institution or area of the UK.

What is open knowledge?

By John Lubbock, Communications Coordinator

One of our main strategic goals at Wikimedia UK is to promote 'open knowledge'. Open knowledge is the catch all term for content published on Open Licenses like the Creative Commons licenses used on Wikipedia and its sister sites. However, it can be quite difficult to promote something when a lot of people don't quite know what it is or why it's useful. A few months ago I thought it would be useful to make a short video explaining the history of Copyright, based on the History section of the Copyright Wikipedia article. Having written this out, it became clear to me that you can't understand how open knowledge came to be an important idea without understanding how is has become a reaction to the limiting control of commercial copyright on what you are allowed to do with others' content. A lot of content is not made to be commercially saleable, but because copyright is applied automatically, this can create problems. 'Orphan works' for example, that were not created for commercial purposes, are off limits for reuse until the copyright has expired, which is usually 70 years after the death of the author. If the author is unknown, however, as in the case of orphan works, nobody knows when they are technically out of copyright. Archives can continue to hold such content and charge money for their reuse, long after they may have become out of copyright.

So please enjoy this short history of copyright, and feel free to reuse it, as it's completely Open Licensed. It's also available on YouTube here.

What is open knowledge? (A short history of copyright)