Talk:Project grants/Writing about Portsmouth: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The budget holder has approved this grant.
(→Discussion: reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{ping|Richard Nevell (WMUK)}} and {{ping|Karla Marte(WMUK)}} I endorse this grant request and would like to see it approved as soon as possible. I've given Portsmouth a heavy review and think it would really benefit from some further history research before I pass it. What the article really needs is some decent book research I think. Jaguar is an experienced editor and a friend, so I think he'll put the sources to some use.[[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]) 09:37, 8 September 2016 (BST) | {{ping|Richard Nevell (WMUK)}} and {{ping|Karla Marte(WMUK)}} I endorse this grant request and would like to see it approved as soon as possible. I've given Portsmouth a heavy review and think it would really benefit from some further history research before I pass it. What the article really needs is some decent book research I think. Jaguar is an experienced editor and a friend, so I think he'll put the sources to some use.[[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] ([[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|talk]]) 09:37, 8 September 2016 (BST) | ||
:Thank you [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] your thoughts on this are very useful. I've just emailed Jaguar about this to follow up our discussion from last week. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 13:46, 8 September 2016 (BST) | :Thank you [[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]] your thoughts on this are very useful. I've just emailed Jaguar about this to follow up our discussion from last week. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 13:46, 8 September 2016 (BST) | ||
==Approval== | |||
{{divbox|green|The budget holder has approved this grant.}} | |||
[[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:24, 9 September 2016 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 14:24, 9 September 2016
Discussion
@Richard Nevell (WMUK): and @Karla Marte(WMUK): I endorse this grant request and would like to see it approved as soon as possible. I've given Portsmouth a heavy review and think it would really benefit from some further history research before I pass it. What the article really needs is some decent book research I think. Jaguar is an experienced editor and a friend, so I think he'll put the sources to some use.Dr. Blofeld (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2016 (BST)
- Thank you Dr. Blofeld your thoughts on this are very useful. I've just emailed Jaguar about this to follow up our discussion from last week. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:46, 8 September 2016 (BST)
Approval
Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2016 (BST)