Evaluation Panel: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(expand from the original eval panel proposal) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Grants header}} | {{Grants header}} | ||
Wikimedia UK's '''Evaluation Panel's''' role is to scrutinise all incoming [[Grants|grant requests]], and also other project proposals, and to then to advise the Programmes Team on whether or not they should be accepted. | Wikimedia UK's '''Evaluation Panel's''' role is to scrutinise all incoming [[Grants|grant requests]], and also other project proposals, and to then to advise the Programmes Team on whether or not they should be accepted. They are to evaluate the impact of proposed projects against our strategic goals, in the light of the resources available to us, and to advise the Programmes Team on which projects should be adopted or supported by the charity. | ||
Small projects and simple grant applications would sometimes be dealt with quickly via a 'fast track' process within the staff team, but with larger projects such as proposed Wikimedians in Residence would always be considered more formally by the whole group. | |||
The current panel members are: | The current panel members are: | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Evaluation Panel]] | [[Category:Evaluation Panel]] | ||
[[Category:Volunteer]] |
Revision as of 15:43, 15 August 2016
Project grants (£5–250) or Partnership Funding (£250 and upwards) |
Wikimedia UK's Evaluation Panel's role is to scrutinise all incoming grant requests, and also other project proposals, and to then to advise the Programmes Team on whether or not they should be accepted. They are to evaluate the impact of proposed projects against our strategic goals, in the light of the resources available to us, and to advise the Programmes Team on which projects should be adopted or supported by the charity.
Small projects and simple grant applications would sometimes be dealt with quickly via a 'fast track' process within the staff team, but with larger projects such as proposed Wikimedians in Residence would always be considered more formally by the whole group.
The current panel members are:
- Josie Fraser – Board Liaison
- Hera Hussain
- Dave Craven
- Katherine Bavage
- Daria Cybulska - staff lead
- Lucy Crompton-Reid
- Chris Keating
Karla Marte is also supporting the work of the group.