Talk:2016 Strategy Consultation: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fmt)
mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


::Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. [[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) ]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) |talk]]) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
::Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. [[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) ]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) |talk]]) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
[[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:15, 17 May 2016 (BST)

Revision as of 10:15, 17 May 2016

Thing to consider

"through the democratic creation"
wikipedia is not a democracy

Geni (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST)

Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
WP:NOTDEMOCRACY refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST)
Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.Geni (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST)
Good point LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.Geni (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST)
I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3?
Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)

LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2016 (BST)