Talk:2016 Strategy Consultation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Response to comments) |
(cm) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... | Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... | ||
::[[:en:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY|WP:NOTDEMOCRACY]] refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST) | |||
[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST) | [[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 10:11, 17 May 2016
Thing to consider
- "through the democratic creation"
- wikipedia is not a democracy
Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look...
- WP:NOTDEMOCRACY refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST)
Geni (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST)
- Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.Geni (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST)
Good point
- Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.Geni (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST)
I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3?
Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment.