Talk:Minutes 2014-09-19: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Categorisation== Is there a reason why these minutes are categorised only with date? This means they come up in the category as "2"? But this has not been done consistently....") |
(→Categorisation: reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Categorisation== | ==Categorisation== | ||
Is there a reason why these minutes are categorised only with date? This means they come up in the category as "2"? But this has not been done consistently.? [[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 13:25, 22 September 2015 (BST) | Is there a reason why these minutes are categorised only with date? This means they come up in the category as "2"? But this has not been done consistently.? [[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 13:25, 22 September 2015 (BST) | ||
:The category uses a sort key, in this case so that the pages in the category are listed in date order. This would have been more useful when the format was in the form 'Minutes (month) (year)' but with the date in the format 2014-09-19 it effectively does it by default. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:02, 22 September 2015 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 22 September 2015
Categorisation
Is there a reason why these minutes are categorised only with date? This means they come up in the category as "2"? But this has not been done consistently.? Leutha (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2015 (BST)
- The category uses a sort key, in this case so that the pages in the category are listed in date order. This would have been more useful when the format was in the form 'Minutes (month) (year)' but with the date in the format 2014-09-19 it effectively does it by default. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 15:02, 22 September 2015 (BST)