Talk:Events/Event Template: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(where) |
m (Daria Cybulska (WMUK) moved page User talk:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)/event template to Talk:Events/Event Template: should be in the mainspace) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Every event WMUK community or office sets up would have an event page with the the elements outlined [[User:Daria Cybulska (WMUK)/event template|here]]. Ideally the office contact for a particular event would assist in capturing needed metrics. | |||
==Where does evaluation come into play?== | ==Where does evaluation come into play?== | ||
# | #Set the goals for the event - why does it exist, what do you want to achieve (for a rather lengthy explanation see [[meta:Programs:Evaluation portal/Library/Logic model template|here]]. Do you want to create content? Attract new editors? Create a partnership with an institution? | ||
# | #Capture the details of the attendees (during registration, at the event) | ||
# | #Capture what has been done during the event | ||
# | #Get feedback from participants at the end of the event and collate the results (category:Event feedback) | ||
# | #Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later | ||
#Look at broader outcomes and record | |||
==Feedback forms for conferences== | |||
They will be constructed differently to a Wikipedia workshop feedback. It should include elements on: | |||
* Audience demographics (standard) and interests around this event | |||
* Content based questions - surveying what the conference was about, different for every event. | |||
* Aims of the conference based questions - safe to assume people attended the event to 1) learn and 2) network. This can be surveyed. | |||
==notes== | |||
{{commonscat|Kingston University Women in Science editathon|position=left}} | |||
== This is good == | |||
I like this template! [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 16:51, 1 May 2014 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 5 December 2014
Every event WMUK community or office sets up would have an event page with the the elements outlined here. Ideally the office contact for a particular event would assist in capturing needed metrics.
Where does evaluation come into play?
- Set the goals for the event - why does it exist, what do you want to achieve (for a rather lengthy explanation see here. Do you want to create content? Attract new editors? Create a partnership with an institution?
- Capture the details of the attendees (during registration, at the event)
- Capture what has been done during the event
- Get feedback from participants at the end of the event and collate the results (category:Event feedback)
- Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later
- Look at broader outcomes and record
Feedback forms for conferences
They will be constructed differently to a Wikipedia workshop feedback. It should include elements on:
- Audience demographics (standard) and interests around this event
- Content based questions - surveying what the conference was about, different for every event.
- Aims of the conference based questions - safe to assume people attended the event to 1) learn and 2) network. This can be surveyed.
notes
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Kingston University Women in Science editathon |
This is good
I like this template! MartinPoulter (talk) 16:51, 1 May 2014 (BST)