Talk:Minutes 2011-11-19: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Rock drum moved page Talk:Minutes 19Nov11 to Talk:Minutes 2011-11-19: Consistent with other minutes names)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


:Do you believe some decisions have not been recorded? If so, which ones? It is probably just an oversight. While details of individual comments may not strictly be necessary, they are interesting and allow members to better understand and scrutinise the work of the Board. They could be particularly useful if current board members stand for re-election - members will know what they've said in meetings and can use that information to help them decide how to vote. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 00:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
:Do you believe some decisions have not been recorded? If so, which ones? It is probably just an oversight. While details of individual comments may not strictly be necessary, they are interesting and allow members to better understand and scrutinise the work of the Board. They could be particularly useful if current board members stand for re-election - members will know what they've said in meetings and can use that information to help them decide how to vote. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 00:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
::213.1.240.149 raises a good point - next time I keep minutes, I'll focus a little more on the decisions made. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry]] 03:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:03, 14 August 2014

This is a good record in general, but I suggest they ought to do more to record decisions and conclusions and less to record discussions and opinions. In particular I'm not sure on the value of recording the views expressed by each individual in a discussion, unless they specifically request it.

Article 24 seems to give a good guide for the content of minutes (my emphasis added):

24. The Directors must keep minutes of all:

... (c) meetings of the Directors and committees of Directors including:
(i) the names of the Directors present at the meeting;
(ii) the decisions made at the meetings; and
(iii) where appropriate the reasons for the decisions.

213.1.240.149 20:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Do you believe some decisions have not been recorded? If so, which ones? It is probably just an oversight. While details of individual comments may not strictly be necessary, they are interesting and allow members to better understand and scrutinise the work of the Board. They could be particularly useful if current board members stand for re-election - members will know what they've said in meetings and can use that information to help them decide how to vote. --Tango 00:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
213.1.240.149 raises a good point - next time I keep minutes, I'll focus a little more on the decisions made. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 03:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)