Talk:IT Development/Doc: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cm on htaccess)
 
m (Richard Symonds (WMUK) moved page Talk:Development/Doc to Talk:IT Development/Doc over a redirect without leaving a redirect)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== htaccess ==
== htaccess ==
We currently use this for most of our domains and subdomains, so migrating away from this may take a little while. But then, we have tended to use fairly simple htaccess documents, so this may not be a big job... Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 00:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
We currently use this for most of our domains and subdomains, so migrating away from this may take a little while. But then, we have tended to use fairly simple htaccess documents, so this may not be a big job... Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 00:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
:Even if every single site is different, requiring me to rework it for Nginx format, it will still only take half a day total. The upside is not having to use Apache :) --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 11:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
:: What's wrong with Apache? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 22:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
::: Outdate/Bloated, harder to configure, painful SSL support, personal preference :) I mean, if Apache is desperately preferred I could install it, but I suspect we'd have to increase server capacity to handle it. --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 10:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
:::: Fair enough. :-) Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 18:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:58, 7 July 2014

htaccess

We currently use this for most of our domains and subdomains, so migrating away from this may take a little while. But then, we have tended to use fairly simple htaccess documents, so this may not be a big job... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Even if every single site is different, requiring me to rework it for Nginx format, it will still only take half a day total. The upside is not having to use Apache :) --ErrantX (talk) 11:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
What's wrong with Apache? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Outdate/Bloated, harder to configure, painful SSL support, personal preference :) I mean, if Apache is desperately preferred I could install it, but I suspect we'd have to increase server capacity to handle it. --ErrantX (talk) 10:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)