Talk:Expert outreach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(update) |
m (Richard Symonds (WMUK) moved page Talk:A to Talk:Expert outreach over redirect: rv vandlaism) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I've had feedback from a partner saying the brochures would be more effective as two-sided flyers which fire up enthusiasm and direct readers to the more extensive online version for the details. This would mean separating the brochures into tabs on this site, and would mean less desktop publishing effort. I'll implement this suggestion. [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] 18:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC) | I've had feedback from a partner saying the brochures would be more effective as two-sided flyers which fire up enthusiasm and direct readers to the more extensive online version for the details. This would mean separating the brochures into tabs on this site, and would mean less desktop publishing effort. I'll implement this suggestion. [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] 18:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Page title == | |||
How about something like 'expert engagement'? [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 12:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:49, 7 July 2014
The page right now is incomplete. Needing to be added at some point:
- Society of Biology (need more info about the event that has already happened with them)
- Food Standards Agency (developing an event)
- British Psychological Society (meeting soon about a range of possible activities)
- Wellcome Trust (internal workshop)
MartinPoulter 15:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
I've had feedback from a partner saying the brochures would be more effective as two-sided flyers which fire up enthusiasm and direct readers to the more extensive online version for the details. This would mean separating the brochures into tabs on this site, and would mean less desktop publishing effort. I'll implement this suggestion. MartinPoulter 18:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Page title
How about something like 'expert engagement'? Mike Peel 12:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)