Talk:Events/Event Template: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→This is good: new section) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==notes== | ==notes== | ||
{{commonscat|Kingston University Women in Science editathon|position=left}} | {{commonscat|Kingston University Women in Science editathon|position=left}} | ||
== This is good == | |||
I like this template! [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 16:51, 1 May 2014 (BST) |
Revision as of 16:51, 1 May 2014
Every event WMUK community or office sets up would have an event page with the the elements outlined here. Ideally the office contact for a particular event would assist in capturing needed metrics.
Where does evaluation come into play?
- Set the goals for the event - why does it exist, what do you want to achieve (for a rather lengthy explanation see here. Do you want to create content? Attract new editors? Create a partnership with an institution?
- Capture the details of the attendees (during registration, at the event)
- Capture what has been done during the event
- Get feedback from participants at the end of the event and collate the results (category:Event feedback)
- Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later
- Look at broader outcomes and record
Feedback forms for conferences
They will be constructed differently to a Wikipedia workshop feedback. It should include elements on:
- Audience demographics (standard) and interests around this event
- Content based questions - surveying what the conference was about, different for every event.
- Aims of the conference based questions - safe to assume people attended the event to 1) learn and 2) network. This can be surveyed.
notes
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Kingston University Women in Science editathon |
This is good
I like this template! MartinPoulter (talk) 16:51, 1 May 2014 (BST)