2014 Activity Plan/Annual Conference and AGM: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(Update)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
* Initial planning Q1 and Q2
* Initial planning Q1 and Q2 - please see [[2014 Annual General Meeting/planning|here]] for extensive planning detail
* Organising and delivery Q3 - August 2014 to coincide with Wikimania  
* Organising and delivery Q3 - August 2014 to coincide with Wikimania  
* Evaluation Q3
* Evaluation Q3
Line 21: Line 21:


We have a thriving community of WMUK volunteers:
We have a thriving community of WMUK volunteers:
*We will attract 50 community members in 2014, and aim for year-on-year increase in attendance of 20 (on wiki/civi event)
*We will attract 58 community members in 2014, and aim for year-on-year increase in attendance of 20 (on wiki/civi event)


WMUK volunteers are highly diverse
WMUK volunteers are highly diverse
Line 37: Line 37:
* Poor turn out leads to erosion of democratic mandate.
* Poor turn out leads to erosion of democratic mandate.
* Poor programme not generating interest
* Poor programme not generating interest


[[Category:2014 Activity Plan]]
[[Category:2014 Activity Plan]]

Latest revision as of 10:18, 9 April 2014

Lead member of staff

Katie Chan

Indicative budget amount

£2,500

Description and overall rationale

The Annual Conference has traditionally been the opportunity for members of the chapter, and anyone else interested, to discuss topics of interest and make the annual decisions at the AGM. We aim to generate discussion about chapter’s activities.

For 2013 plan, see here.

Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
  • Initial planning Q1 and Q2 - please see here for extensive planning detail
  • Organising and delivery Q3 - August 2014 to coincide with Wikimania
  • Evaluation Q3
Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant
Risks
  • Low attendance - spend inadequate
  • Poor turn out leads to erosion of democratic mandate.
  • Poor programme not generating interest