Talk:EduWiki Conference 2014/Planning: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I shouldn't need to ask, but this committee generally seems to have been forgotten about. :-() |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (Do you consider that committee to be active?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please could the [[Conference Committee]] be involved in the process of planning for this event? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 20:55, 4 April 2014 (BST) | Please could the [[Conference Committee]] be involved in the process of planning for this event? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 20:55, 4 April 2014 (BST) | ||
:Mike, do you consider that committee to be active? The main page lists no meetings since 2012 and there appear to have been no actions at all for nearly a year now, even by email. Surely it has not been meeting in secret? There are a number of volunteers still listed as members, but if the group has not been closely involved with the preparations for Wikimania for some time already it is presumably somewhat moribund. There have certainly been no committee reports to the board for a long time. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 22:42, 4 April 2014 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 22:42, 4 April 2014
Please could the Conference Committee be involved in the process of planning for this event? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 4 April 2014 (BST)
- Mike, do you consider that committee to be active? The main page lists no meetings since 2012 and there appear to have been no actions at all for nearly a year now, even by email. Surely it has not been meeting in secret? There are a number of volunteers still listed as members, but if the group has not been closely involved with the preparations for Wikimania for some time already it is presumably somewhat moribund. There have certainly been no committee reports to the board for a long time. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:42, 4 April 2014 (BST)