Strategy monitoring plan 2014-15: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a draft policy that is open for community consultation until 28th February 2014. If you have comments or suggestions for improvements, please make them on the talk page. The board intends to adopt a finalised strategic plan 2014-2019 at its meeting in March 2014.
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (paste table) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (divbox) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{divbox|yellow| | |||
This is a draft policy that is open for community consultation until 28th February 2014. If you have comments or suggestions for improvements, please make them on the talk page. The board intends to adopt a finalised strategic plan 2014-2019 at its meeting in March 2014.}} | |||
{| | {| | ||
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Outcome''' | | align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Outcome''' |
Revision as of 16:58, 1 February 2014
Outcome | Outcome Measure | Proxy? | Annual target (to Feb 2015) | Notes |
G1.1 The quantity of educational Open Content continues to increase | Number of uploads | Track only | Measure to be tracked and reported, but no annual target since number could vary wildly | |
Sum of positive edit size [1] | y | Track only | Needs more research; may not be able to do this year | |
G1.2 The quality of educational Open Content continues to improve | Files in mainspace use on a WM project (excluding Commons) | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
Files that have featured status on a WM project (excluding Commons) | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
Featured Picture status on Commons | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
Quality Image status on Commons | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
G1.3 We are perceived as the go-to organisation by UK GLAM, educational, and other organisations who need support or advice for the release of educational Open Content. | Sum of GLAM reputation scores [2] of organisations that we have partnerships with | y | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |
Score in annual national survey of public opinion [12] | Survey questions to be determined | |||
G2a.1 We have a thriving community of WMUK volunteers. | Number of Friends | (work is ongoing as to how this would work; to be shared with community before implementation) | ||
Number of very active [3] volunteers | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
Volunteer Activity Units [4] | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
Leading Volunteer Activity Units [5] | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
G2a.2 WMUK volunteers are highly diverse. | Proportion of Volunteer Activity Units [4] attributable to women | 20% | ||
Proportion of Leading Volunteer Activity Units [4] attributable to women | 15% | |||
Volunteer Activity Units [4] in activities to encourage other diversity or minority engagement | y | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
G2a.3 WMUK volunteers are skilled and capable. | Volunteer Activity Units [4] in training sessions and editathons | y | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |
Annual survey capability score [6] (self-identified) | ||||
Automated Wiki capability score [7] | May not be possible this year: needs significant work | |||
G2b.1 We have best practice governance and resource management processes, and are recognised for such within the Wikimedia movement and the UK charity sector. | Progress on targets in the Hudson and Chapman governance reviews | All targets that we agree with completed and externally accredited | ||
Progress towards PQASSO 2 | Complete all internal preparations for PQASSO 2 ready for external accreditation | |||
Progress towards clean annual report by external auditers | Clean annual report | |||
Level of external recognition | Narrative + 2/5 eval [16] | |||
G2b.3 We have high quality systems to measure our impact as an organisation. | Progress towards full implemention of automated and manual tracking/measuring systems [8] | Narrative + 2/5 eval [16] | ||
G2b.2 We have a high level of openness and transparency. | Transparency score [9] as measured by annual survey | Survey questions to be determined | ||
Transparency compliance [10] as measured by Govcom against published transparency commitments | Narrative + 5/5 eval | |||
G2b.4 We ensure a stable, sustainable and diverse funding stream. | Number of separate donors | |||
Funds received from sources other than WMF fundraiser or FDC | £ | |||
Proportion of funds from sources other than WMF fundraiser or FDC | ||||
Proportion of funds from direct debits | ||||
G3.1 Access to Wikimedia projects is increasingly available to all, irrespective of personal characteristics, background or situation. | QRPedia codes scanned [11] | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
QRPedia codes scanned [11] using a language other than English | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
New readers enabled to access Wikimedia websites | Need to define more closely | |||
G3.2 There is increased awareness of the benefits of Open Content. | Awareness score [12] in annual national survey of public opinion | Survey questions to be determined | ||
G3.3 Legislative and institutional changes favour the release of Open Content. | Responses to EU and UK government policy consultations. | y | Narrative | |
Involvement in EU and UK advocacy activities | y | Narrative + 2/5 eval [16] | ||
G4.1 Technical communities with missions similar to our own are thriving. | Number of shared activities [12] with technology-based groups or organisations having similar goals to WMUK | y | At least two events | |
Total Activity Units [13] in shared activities [14] with technology-based groups or organisations having similar goals to WMUK | y | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
G4.2 There are robust and efficient tools readily available to enable the creation, curation and dissemination of Open Content. | Uses [15] of the tools we host or support | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
New tools we develop or help develop | ||||
G4.3 There are robust and efficient tools readily available to allow WMUK - and related organisations - to support our own programmes and to enable us to effectively record impact measures. | Uses [15] of the tools we host or support | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | ||
New tools we develop or help develop | ||||
G5.1 A thriving set of other Wikimedia communities | Funding to support other chapters and Wikimedia groups | y | £ | |
Activities for or jointly with other chapters and Wikimedia groups | At least 3 events in total (including G5.2 and G5.3 events) | |||
Total Activity Units [13] in shared activities [14] with other chapters and Wikimedia groups | Baseline values to be determined before deciding on target | |||
G5.2 An increased diversity of Wikimedia contributors | Activities specifically directed to supporting the diversity of other chapters and Wikimedia groups | y | At least one event | |
G5.3 Wikimedia communities are skilled and capable. | Activities specifically directed to help train or to share knowledge with other chapters and Wikimedia groups | y | At least one event |