User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)/Priorities: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Puzzle: new section) |
m (Richard Nevell (WMUK) moved page Talk:Office and Development Manager priorities to User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)/Priorities without leaving a redirect) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Finding a way to deal with scope creep from an unreasonably demanding volunteer at the last minute would have been a valuable learning experience for them! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 16:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | Finding a way to deal with scope creep from an unreasonably demanding volunteer at the last minute would have been a valuable learning experience for them! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 16:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
:True, but the building managers were getting pretty annoyed about the jigsaw... [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Transparency == | |||
Thanks Richard for being so transparent about your priorities - it's really nice to see this page. :-) [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks Mike! [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 12:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:27, 17 January 2014
I propose the immediate contralaction of this page. 92.28.200.116 15:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Puzzle
Finding a way to deal with scope creep from an unreasonably demanding volunteer at the last minute would have been a valuable learning experience for them! --Tango (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- True, but the building managers were getting pretty annoyed about the jigsaw... Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 10:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Transparency
Thanks Richard for being so transparent about your priorities - it's really nice to see this page. :-) Mike Peel (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Mike! Richard Symonds (talk) 12:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)