User talk:EdSaperia/Wikimedia UK's 2014 Strategy: Difference between revisions
(Interesting stuff, Ed.) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (Suggest main boards to get more feedback) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi Ed, this is really interesting. There's some cool stuff in there. With regards to the idea of learners as contributors, we spoke about this at the recent education committee meeting. As a group we really want to shift digital literacy and fluency back up our agenda. To this end we are going to be creating a digital literacy strategy and it would be great if you could have some input to this. I'll keep you posted. With regards to the community management side of things, some of this is within Katie's remit - although admittedly she isn't focused on a specific tech community. Could be a good one to discuss with Katie. With regards to the third idea, if this can be done in a way that is structured and doesn't create too much of an administrative burden for volunteers then I am definitely all for it. It's a sensible way of highlighting useful sources and reference material, particularly, as you say, for things like WikiProject Medicine. Thanks for sketching this out, I hope others will join the conversation. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | Hi Ed, this is really interesting. There's some cool stuff in there. With regards to the idea of learners as contributors, we spoke about this at the recent education committee meeting. As a group we really want to shift digital literacy and fluency back up our agenda. To this end we are going to be creating a digital literacy strategy and it would be great if you could have some input to this. I'll keep you posted. With regards to the community management side of things, some of this is within Katie's remit - although admittedly she isn't focused on a specific tech community. Could be a good one to discuss with Katie. With regards to the third idea, if this can be done in a way that is structured and doesn't create too much of an administrative burden for volunteers then I am definitely all for it. It's a sensible way of highlighting useful sources and reference material, particularly, as you say, for things like WikiProject Medicine. Thanks for sketching this out, I hope others will join the conversation. [[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
As very few people will be watching this page, I suggest you post these three ideas onto our main community notice boards. The first and last are external projects so should go to the Water Cooler. The second is more internal to WMUK and should go to the Engine Room. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 21:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:28, 16 January 2014
Hi Ed, this is really interesting. There's some cool stuff in there. With regards to the idea of learners as contributors, we spoke about this at the recent education committee meeting. As a group we really want to shift digital literacy and fluency back up our agenda. To this end we are going to be creating a digital literacy strategy and it would be great if you could have some input to this. I'll keep you posted. With regards to the community management side of things, some of this is within Katie's remit - although admittedly she isn't focused on a specific tech community. Could be a good one to discuss with Katie. With regards to the third idea, if this can be done in a way that is structured and doesn't create too much of an administrative burden for volunteers then I am definitely all for it. It's a sensible way of highlighting useful sources and reference material, particularly, as you say, for things like WikiProject Medicine. Thanks for sketching this out, I hope others will join the conversation. Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
As very few people will be watching this page, I suggest you post these three ideas onto our main community notice boards. The first and last are external projects so should go to the Water Cooler. The second is more internal to WMUK and should go to the Engine Room. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)