Talk:Anti-Bribery Policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (Some immediate thoughts) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 18:59, 8 January 2014
Some immediate thoughts:
- We can't control volunteers unless we have authorised them to act on our behalf, in which case they may become 'associated persons' under the Act. If a volunteer is formally acting on our behalf (eg is representing us) we presumably need to get them to sign before they undertake anything. Are we doing that already? If not, we may need to discuss how to make sure that happens in every case. Not trivial I suspect, as we may need to first to complete our discussions of who we allow to represent us. part of the volunteer policy, in progress with Govcom?
- We are an English company and while it goes without saying that we comply with English law, including the Act, we cannot commit to comply with any foreign law. Such laws might require us to act outside our charitable objects or even in conflict with English law. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)