Talk:Privacy policy/IT guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Hi Mike, not sure to understand you right, do you disagree with the sentence which directly follows the one you have quoted "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced, the data are private and should not be communicated to a third party."? [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC) | :Hi Mike, not sure to understand you right, do you disagree with the sentence which directly follows the one you have quoted "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced, the data are private and should not be communicated to a third party."? [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
:: I'm not sure I understand it, sorry! I'd suggest rewording "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced", as I'm not sure it means what you intend it to mean... Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 17:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | :: I'm not sure I understand it, sorry! I'd suggest rewording "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced", as I'm not sure it means what you intend it to mean... Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 17:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
::: I mean "As long as it is not clearly announced that a data is public and consequently might be shared" | ::: I mean "As long as it is not clearly announced that a data is public and consequently might be shared"... data are private (and so one should not be shared). Is that more clear? [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 17:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:58, 1 January 2014
"People interacting with Wikimedia UK (members, board members, donors, staff and partners in general) deserve absolute privacy in their exchange with Wikimedia UK." - there's a tension here between privacy and transparency, which could do with expanding on. Privacy is only really important when it comes to confidential things that can't be made public for whatever reason, and it's only then that we should be aiming to keep things as private as they can be. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Mike, not sure to understand you right, do you disagree with the sentence which directly follows the one you have quoted "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced, the data are private and should not be communicated to a third party."? Kelson (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)