Talk:Privacy policy/IT guidelines: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(comment)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
"People interacting with Wikimedia UK (members, board members, donors, staff and partners in general) deserve absolute privacy in their exchange with Wikimedia UK." - there's a tension here between privacy and transparency, which could do with expanding on. Privacy is only really important when it comes to confidential things that can't be made public for whatever reason, and it's only then that we should be aiming to keep things as private as they can be. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
"People interacting with Wikimedia UK (members, board members, donors, staff and partners in general) deserve absolute privacy in their exchange with Wikimedia UK." - there's a tension here between privacy and transparency, which could do with expanding on. Privacy is only really important when it comes to confidential things that can't be made public for whatever reason, and it's only then that we should be aiming to keep things as private as they can be. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
:Hi Mike, not sure to understand you right, do you disagree with the sentence which directly follows the one you have quoted "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced, the data are private and should not be communicated to a third party."? [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:54, 31 December 2013

"People interacting with Wikimedia UK (members, board members, donors, staff and partners in general) deserve absolute privacy in their exchange with Wikimedia UK." - there's a tension here between privacy and transparency, which could do with expanding on. Privacy is only really important when it comes to confidential things that can't be made public for whatever reason, and it's only then that we should be aiming to keep things as private as they can be. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mike, not sure to understand you right, do you disagree with the sentence which directly follows the one you have quoted "As long as the contrary is not clearly announced, the data are private and should not be communicated to a third party."? Kelson (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)