2014 Activity Plan/Wikimedians in Residence: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(risks and timelines) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter | ;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter | ||
* Recruitment drive in the beginning of Q1 - residencies start towards the end of Q1 and depending on the funding and demand continue throughout the rest of 2014-15; continuing of existing residencies | |||
* Review of the programme to date - Q2 | |||
;Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant | ;Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
;Risks | ;Risks | ||
*Reputation and conflicts of interest. (Countermeasure: WMUK is putting in place contracts to protect both parties and the WiR themselves) | |||
*WiRs are unable to bridge their host community, the Wikimedia UK community and the general population (Countermeasure: Support the GLAM network with shared case studies, workshopping and mobilize support as needed for key points in the most visible projects) | |||
*Funding will not be scalable as demand increases (Countermeasure: Build relationships with significant independent funding bodies) | |||
[[Category:2014 Activity Plan]] | [[Category:2014 Activity Plan]] | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 19 December 2013
- Lead member of staff
Daria Cybulska
- Indicative budget amount
£71,000
- Description and overall rationale
In the past year we have seen more institutions (GLAM, education and others) working with Wikimedia UK. The chapter is nurturing the drive to share collections and information to increase the sum of human knowledge. The UK Wikimedian in Residence programme is a powerful expression of this drive. We are part-funding Wikimedian in Residence positions to support opportunities in particular areas. The number of positions depends on negotiations with partner institutions about how a Wikimedian in Residence fits with their organisation and how much support they will make available. These posts build strong bridges with institutions and also act as a focus for community involvement and development.
Each residency has individual goals that are in line with Wikimedia UK's objectives; to learn more please see below.
- Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
- Recruitment drive in the beginning of Q1 - residencies start towards the end of Q1 and depending on the funding and demand continue throughout the rest of 2014-15; continuing of existing residencies
- Review of the programme to date - Q2
- Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant
- Review of the programme is carried out (on wiki)
- Good quality WiRs are selected, 5 active in 2014-15 (documentation on wiki)
- A clear programme of activities for each WIR established and delivered in consultation with the host institutions (information gathered on office wiki)
- Every residency has own targets and expected outcomes, e.g.:
- Establishing a cooperation between Wikimedia UK and the Institution;
- Engagement with the Wikipedia community;
- Increased the number of contributors to Wikimedia projects;
- Facilitating content improvement of Wikimedia projects;
- Case study produced; which are reported on monthly or bimonthly - for example, the resident at the National Library of Scotland is reporting against objectives monthly - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/NLS/4thMonth_Report
- Risks
- Reputation and conflicts of interest. (Countermeasure: WMUK is putting in place contracts to protect both parties and the WiR themselves)
- WiRs are unable to bridge their host community, the Wikimedia UK community and the general population (Countermeasure: Support the GLAM network with shared case studies, workshopping and mobilize support as needed for key points in the most visible projects)
- Funding will not be scalable as demand increases (Countermeasure: Build relationships with significant independent funding bodies)