2014 Activity Plan/Wikimedians in Residence: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added Category:2014 Activity Plan using HotCat) |
(draft) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;Lead member of staff | |||
;Indicative budget amount | |||
;Description and overall rationale | |||
;Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter | |||
;Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant | |||
<div class="NavFrame collapsed"> | |||
<div class="NavHead">Goals</div> | |||
<div class="NavContent"> | |||
:Every residency has own targets set and agreed with the institution, a template of which can be seen on the ‘Project Outcomes’ section of the [[:WMUK:File:Example_WiR_agreement.pdf|Agreement]] (e.g. establishing a cooperation between Wikimedia UK and the Institution; Engagement with the Wikipedia community; Increased the number of contributors to Wikimedia projects; Facilitating content improvement of Wikimedia projects; Case study produced). | |||
: A good quality WiRs are selected, 5 active in 2014-15. | |||
: A clear programme of activities for each WIR established and delivered in consultation with the host institutions. Every agreement has the expected outcomes outlined so both parties know what success would look like. | |||
: All residents report regularly about their activities monthly or bimonthly. | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
;Risks | |||
[[Category:2014 Activity Plan]] | [[Category:2014 Activity Plan]] | ||
Revision as of 08:36, 18 December 2013
- Lead member of staff
- Indicative budget amount
- Description and overall rationale
- Timelines - i.e. what happens quarter by quarter
- Success criteria and Metrics - overall and quarter by quarter breakdown if relevant
Goals
- Every residency has own targets set and agreed with the institution, a template of which can be seen on the ‘Project Outcomes’ section of the Agreement (e.g. establishing a cooperation between Wikimedia UK and the Institution; Engagement with the Wikipedia community; Increased the number of contributors to Wikimedia projects; Facilitating content improvement of Wikimedia projects; Case study produced).
- A good quality WiRs are selected, 5 active in 2014-15.
- A clear programme of activities for each WIR established and delivered in consultation with the host institutions. Every agreement has the expected outcomes outlined so both parties know what success would look like.
- All residents report regularly about their activities monthly or bimonthly.
- Risks