Talk:Events/Event Template: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Feedback forms for conferences) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later | #Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later | ||
#Look at broader outcomes and record | #Look at broader outcomes and record | ||
==Feedback forms for conferences== | |||
They will be constructed differently to a Wikipedia workshop feedback. It should include elements on: | |||
* Audience demographics (standard) and interests around this event | |||
* Content based questions - surveying what the conference was about, different for every event. | |||
* Aims of the conference based questions - safe to assume people attended the event to 1) learn and 2) network. This can be surveyed. | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 28 November 2013
Every event WMUK community or office sets up would have an event page with the the elements outlined here. Ideally the office contact for a particular event would assist in capturing needed metrics.
Where does evaluation come into play?
- Set the goals for the event - why does it exist, what do you want to achieve (for a rather lengthy explanation see here. Do you want to create content? Attract new editors? Create a partnership with an institution?
- Capture the details of the attendees (during registration, at the event)
- Capture what has been done during the event
- Get feedback from participants at the end of the event and collate the results
- Follow up with an email a week later and 3 months later
- Look at broader outcomes and record
Feedback forms for conferences
They will be constructed differently to a Wikipedia workshop feedback. It should include elements on:
- Audience demographics (standard) and interests around this event
- Content based questions - surveying what the conference was about, different for every event.
- Aims of the conference based questions - safe to assume people attended the event to 1) learn and 2) network. This can be surveyed.