Talk:Wikimedia in Scotland: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) (Wikimedia Scotland is simpler) |
(Let's go for brevity!) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this simply be called Wikimedia Scotland? WMUK has the licence from WMF to use the name "Wikimedia Scotland". It's a waste if we don't claim it :) [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 14:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | Shouldn't this simply be called Wikimedia Scotland? WMUK has the licence from WMF to use the name "Wikimedia Scotland". It's a waste if we don't claim it :) [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 14:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
*+1 [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 14:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
*'''Agree'''. I guess the concern might be that "Wikimedia Scotland" sounds more like a separate organisation with all the asociated legal gubins. But we make clear on the page that it is "a sub-group of Wikimedia UK" so I think that should be OK. Let's go for brevity! [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 16:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 22 May 2013
Shouldn't this simply be called Wikimedia Scotland? WMUK has the licence from WMF to use the name "Wikimedia Scotland". It's a waste if we don't claim it :) Deryck Chan (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- +1 Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Agree. I guess the concern might be that "Wikimedia Scotland" sounds more like a separate organisation with all the asociated legal gubins. But we make clear on the page that it is "a sub-group of Wikimedia UK" so I think that should be OK. Let's go for brevity! Yaris678 (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)