Talk:EGM 2013/Minutes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) (JC) |
(→Tallies: re) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
There is a "JC" in the minutes. Who is that? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 23:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC) | There is a "JC" in the minutes. Who is that? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 23:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Almost certain it was John Cummings. Have added that in - thanks for spotting it! [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Tallies == | |||
Happy with these, including my comments recorded. But the notation of the votes reads oddly. Wouldn't: | |||
*For: 17 (in the room), 53 in favour (in total including proxy votes). | |||
*Against: 5 (in the room), 9 against (in total including proxy votes). | |||
- read better as: | |||
*For: 53 in total including proxy votes (17 in the room) | |||
*Against: 9 in total including proxy votes (5 in the room) | |||
- or something like that? [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
: That would indeed read better, thanks for the suggestion - now done. :-) [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:28, 16 May 2013
Question on Resolution 3 from me;
- "MP explained that the election rules are currently entrenched, so that they could not be changed by the membership, and that this would continue with the new election rules."
I wasn't present, but is there a typo here? I would suggest "so that they could not be changed except by the membership" is more accurate. The Land (talk) 20:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Good point, 'except' was missing here. Thanks for catching that! Mike Peel (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
There is a "JC" in the minutes. Who is that? Deryck Chan (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Almost certain it was John Cummings. Have added that in - thanks for spotting it! Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 10:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Tallies
Happy with these, including my comments recorded. But the notation of the votes reads oddly. Wouldn't:
- For: 17 (in the room), 53 in favour (in total including proxy votes).
- Against: 5 (in the room), 9 against (in total including proxy votes).
- read better as:
- For: 53 in total including proxy votes (17 in the room)
- Against: 9 in total including proxy votes (5 in the room)
- or something like that? Johnbod (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)