Talk:Governance Committee Charter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Remit 1.2: 6 months) |
(→Remit 1.2: Possible explanation.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Remit 1.2== | ==Remit 1.2== | ||
The chair has to stand for election at least every two years, right? So do we need point 1.2 of remit, given we have point 1.3? | The chair has to stand for election at least every two years, right? So do we need point 1.2 of remit, given we have point 1.3? Or rather, perhaps 1.2 just needs to cover the review after six months. [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 21:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Is the point that the committee wants to review the chair after two years even if about to stand down? Do we think that will provide information useful to the next chair or board? [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 10:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||