Talk:Meetings/2009 AGM/Board's Report: Difference between revisions
< Talk:Meetings | 2009 AGM
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '== Suggestions == The Board is putting together a brief (perhaps 1/2 page) board report, summarising the acheivements of the initial Board. If you have any ideas about what you…') |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Financial summary (income, expenses, cash held and debts) | # Financial summary (income, expenses, cash held and debts) | ||
# Extracts from the [[Timeline]] | # Extracts from the [[Timeline]] | ||
# Useful contacts if any. | |||
== Correction == | |||
You may wish to get the chair's name right... ;) --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 21:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Done. Thanks [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 22:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Good plan! One other thing: The accounts don't include a cash flow statement. It's easy enough to workout the cash flow situation from the other details (it would look almost identical to the income part of the income statement), but I believe it is conventional to include it. Was it excluded for a reason? --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:29, 26 April 2009
Suggestions
The Board is putting together a brief (perhaps 1/2 page) board report, summarising the acheivements of the initial Board.
If you have any ideas about what you would like it to contain, please put below. Thanks AndrewRT 22:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Financial summary (income, expenses, cash held and debts)
- Extracts from the Timeline
- Useful contacts if any.
Correction
You may wish to get the chair's name right... ;) --Tango 21:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks AndrewRT 22:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good plan! One other thing: The accounts don't include a cash flow statement. It's easy enough to workout the cash flow situation from the other details (it would look almost identical to the income part of the income statement), but I believe it is conventional to include it. Was it excluded for a reason? --Tango 23:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)