IT Development/Proposals/Infrastructure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(create requirements) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Easy to migrate (OpenStack based; which is also open source so another plus!) | * Easy to migrate (OpenStack based; which is also open source so another plus!) | ||
* Secure (multiple servers, sandboxed instances) | * Secure (multiple servers, sandboxed instances) | ||
* Versatile | * Versatile (cloud-based to allow quick migration & scaling) | ||
* Resilient (Hardware failure tolerant) | |||
* UK-based (to simplify compliance issues) | * UK-based (to simplify compliance issues) | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 19 November 2012
Outline for the new infrastructure/servers:
- Easy to migrate (OpenStack based; which is also open source so another plus!)
- Secure (multiple servers, sandboxed instances)
- Versatile (cloud-based to allow quick migration & scaling)
- Resilient (Hardware failure tolerant)
- UK-based (to simplify compliance issues)
Suggested infrastructure:
- 3 "production" servers: one for wikis, one for internal software (civiCRM etc.) and a third for other services (mailing lists etc.)
- Capacity for an on-demand development server
There are a couple of suppliers that would meet these requirements, I will outline them below.