2013 Annual Review: Difference between revisions
(→Images, video and audio: name) |
(→Name: Sure. I think it's a good idea) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===Name=== | ===Name=== | ||
Can we start calling it the "Annual Review"? By convention, the "Annual Report" typically includes the audited accounts & official Trustees' & Chief Exec's Reports, which (as in the past) may well not be ready, and won't be included in full even if they are (I expect). Many organizations combine these with a glossy magazine-style thing like this, but where there are 2 documents, as in our case, the magazine-style one is most often called the "Review". It avoids confusion & I think we should follow this style. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC) | Can we start calling it the "Annual Review"? By convention, the "Annual Report" typically includes the audited accounts & official Trustees' & Chief Exec's Reports, which (as in the past) may well not be ready, and won't be included in full even if they are (I expect). Many organizations combine these with a glossy magazine-style thing like this, but where there are 2 documents, as in our case, the magazine-style one is most often called the "Review". It avoids confusion & I think we should follow this style. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 17:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for your reply John. I think it's a sensible suggestion and I have no objections. More than happy to change the name. Thank you. --[[User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|Stevie Benton (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Stevie Benton (WMUK)|talk]]) 22:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
===Images, video and audio=== | ===Images, video and audio=== | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 13 November 2012
|
This report is still a draft and is not ready for release. Feel free to edit it. You may find Wikinews' manual of style useful. |
The time is fast approaching when we need to start compiling our annual report for 2012-13. We have plenty of time but it makes sense to make a start right away. Please get involved in this discussion and edit the page accordingly. Think about the type of content you would like (such as video and audio elements for the online version) and the topics you would like to be covered. What are your favourite projects? What have been your highlights? I hope that everyone who would like to be involved in this piece of work gets the opportunity to participate! --Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 09:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Topics to cover
- Intro messages from Chair and Chief Executive
- Executive summary
- Programmes
- Events
- Governance
- Membership
- Fundraising
- Communications
- Administration and finance
- GLAM
- Education
- Wikipedians in Residence
- Partnerships
- Community
- What's coming up?
Content
Please link here to any images, videos, documents and web / wiki pages that will be of use for the report.
Name
Can we start calling it the "Annual Review"? By convention, the "Annual Report" typically includes the audited accounts & official Trustees' & Chief Exec's Reports, which (as in the past) may well not be ready, and won't be included in full even if they are (I expect). Many organizations combine these with a glossy magazine-style thing like this, but where there are 2 documents, as in our case, the magazine-style one is most often called the "Review". It avoids confusion & I think we should follow this style. Johnbod (talk) 17:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply John. I think it's a sensible suggestion and I have no objections. More than happy to change the name. Thank you. --Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Images, video and audio
Please make suggestions for multimedia content you;d like to see. Would you like particular videos to be included / recorded in preparation? How about audio? How can we make this year's report more engaging? Would you like to be filmed / recorded speaking about a project you've been involved with? Let us know here.
Other suggestions
Any other suggestions? Add them here!