Talk:Audit Committee

Name

The name is misleading (as stated). How about "The Internal Audit Committee"? Gordo (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

That doesn't make any difference. The potentially confusing bit is the audit part, not whether it's internal or external. As a committee, it already indicate that it's internal. KTC (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

If someone can think of a better name, I'm happy to change it. "Committee of internal affairs"? "Internal review committee"? --Tango (talk) 13:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Need for audit?

B3. Should a charity have an internal audit function or audit committee?

Found at http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc8.aspx. The management of risk is an important part of the audit function, both financial and non-financial risk. Gordo (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

The link provide a good definition of an audit committee in the accounting sense, but that's not what Tango is proposing. KTC (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I see. I had in mind this section. Gordo (talk) 09:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

 The internal auditor usually reports directly to the trustees
or an audit committee set up by the trustees. Internal auditors
look at all the risks facing an organisation and what is being
done to manage those risks. An internal auditor might look at
reputational risk, operational risk or strategic risk.

Internal and External Auditors.

I believe it is good governance in general to appoint distinct companies for audit. For example, Deloitte for internal audit and KPMG for external audit. Gordo (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Can you elaborate on that? What is the distinction? I've never heard of a firm with two auditors... If there is a problem, then you might bring in a second firm to do a one off review, but I've never heard of any kind of routine thing like that. --Tango (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)