Talk:Audit Committee: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Need for audit?: re) |
(→Internal and External Auditors.: new section) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:The link provide a good definition of an audit committee in the accounting sense, but that's not what Tango is proposing. [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 08:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | :The link provide a good definition of an audit committee in the accounting sense, but that's not what Tango is proposing. [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 08:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Internal and External Auditors. == | |||
I believe it is good governance in general to appoint distinct companies for audit. For example, Deloitte for internal audit and KPMG for external audit. [[User:LoopZilla|Gordo]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 09:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:24, 12 November 2012
Name
The name is misleading (as stated). How about "The Internal Audit Committee"? Gordo (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- That doesn't make any difference. The potentially confusing bit is the audit part, not whether it's internal or external. As a committee, it already indicate that it's internal. KTC (talk) 08:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Need for audit?
B3. Should a charity have an internal audit function or audit committee?
Found at http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc8.aspx. The management of risk is an important part of the audit function, both financial and non-financial risk. Gordo (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- The link provide a good definition of an audit committee in the accounting sense, but that's not what Tango is proposing. KTC (talk) 08:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Internal and External Auditors.
I believe it is good governance in general to appoint distinct companies for audit. For example, Deloitte for internal audit and KPMG for external audit. Gordo (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)