2012 Activity Plan/University conference: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(First details)
m (ce)
Line 2: Line 2:
Brought forward from 2011, we will run a two-day EDU-WIKI conference in Autumn 2012, raising awareness of the educational possibilities of Wikipedia and kick-starting Wikimedia UK's academic engagement as the GLAM-WIKI conference did for the chapter's GLAM activity in 2010.
Brought forward from 2011, we will run a two-day EDU-WIKI conference in Autumn 2012, raising awareness of the educational possibilities of Wikipedia and kick-starting Wikimedia UK's academic engagement as the GLAM-WIKI conference did for the chapter's GLAM activity in 2010.


;Amount
;Amount
£10,000
£10,000
Line 13: Line 12:


;Success Criteria
;Success Criteria
Full attendance as per plan
*Full attendance as per plan
 
*Attendees value conference and provide good feedback.
Attendees value conference and provide good feedback.
*Conference content is stimulating and appropriate
 
*That there is follow-up that offers development throughout the University community and builds links with Wikimedia UK.
Conference content is stimulating and appropriate
 
That there is follow-up that offers development throughout the University community and builds links with Wikimedia UK.


;Risks
;Risks
Low attendance.
*Low attendance.
 
*Lack of stimulating content.
Lack of stimulating content.
*Lack of focus.
 
Lack of focus.

Revision as of 18:19, 30 April 2012

Description

Brought forward from 2011, we will run a two-day EDU-WIKI conference in Autumn 2012, raising awareness of the educational possibilities of Wikipedia and kick-starting Wikimedia UK's academic engagement as the GLAM-WIKI conference did for the chapter's GLAM activity in 2010.

Amount

£10,000

Budget responsibility

Martin Poulter with support from Daria Cycbulska

Timetable for activities

September 2012 at Leicester University.

Success Criteria
  • Full attendance as per plan
  • Attendees value conference and provide good feedback.
  • Conference content is stimulating and appropriate
  • That there is follow-up that offers development throughout the University community and builds links with Wikimedia UK.
Risks
  • Low attendance.
  • Lack of stimulating content.
  • Lack of focus.