Talk:Reports: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Newsletter to Talk:Reports: transitioning from a newsletter to a report...) |
(→"being drafted": new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
... I am just setting up [[Newsletter/Audiences]] to try to get a handle on our internal communications audiences... [[User:The Land|The Land]] 22:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | ... I am just setting up [[Newsletter/Audiences]] to try to get a handle on our internal communications audiences... [[User:The Land|The Land]] 22:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
== "being drafted" == | |||
There are currently a lot of reports on this page that say "being drafted". Have they been issued or not? If they haven't, shouldn't finishing them be a priority rather than working on new ones? Obviously, having a new comms person should help out here, but it will probably be difficult for them to catch up with the backlog having not been here for those months. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 00:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, 18 March 2012
Are we keeping any kind of record of who we're sending these newsletters to? Might be useful to have some kind of stats. AndrewRT 18:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, there's my memory. Also, various trails exist for who I've sent the newsletters to thus far, both on wiki and by email. At the moment I think it's more effort than it's worth to keep stats; they can be reconstructed later if we want them. Mike Peel 21:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Is it worth just keeping a note of how many people have received it by email mand on wiki? I think it may be hard to reconstruct the longer we leave it. AndrewRT 15:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
On a similar note...
... I am just setting up Newsletter/Audiences to try to get a handle on our internal communications audiences... The Land 22:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
"being drafted"
There are currently a lot of reports on this page that say "being drafted". Have they been issued or not? If they haven't, shouldn't finishing them be a priority rather than working on new ones? Obviously, having a new comms person should help out here, but it will probably be difficult for them to catch up with the backlog having not been here for those months. --Tango (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)